Abstract
3D printing has been around in the art, micro-engineering, and manufacturing worlds for decades. Similarly, research for traditionally engineered skin tissue has been in the works since the 1990s. As of recent years, the medical field also began to take advantage of the untapped potential of 3D printing for the biofabrication of tissue. To do so, researchers created a set of goals for fabricated tissues based on the characteristics of natural human tissues and organs. Fabricated tissue was then measured against this set of standards. Researchers were interested in not only creating tissue that functioned like natural tissues but in creating techniques for 3D printing that would print tissues quickly, efficiently, and ultimately result in the ability to mass produce fabricated tissues. Three promising methods of 3D printing emerged from their research: thermal inkjet printing with bioink, direct-write bioprinting, and organ printing using tissue spheroids. This review will discuss all three printing techniques, as well as their advantages, disadvantages, and the possibility of future advancements in the field of tissue fabrication.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mironov, V., et al. (2009). Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials, 30(12), 2164–2174.
Cui, X., et al. (2012). Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation, 6(2), 149–155.
Chang, C. C., et al. (2011). Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 98(1), 160–170.
Jakab, K., et al. (2008). Relating cell and tissue mechanics: Implications and applications. Developmental Dynamics, 237(9), 2438–2449.
Dean, D. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2008). Cytoskeletal-mediated tension modulates the directed self-assembly of microtissues. Tissue Engineering Part A, 14(12), 1989–1997.
Ozbolat, I. T., & Yu, Y. (2013). Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 60(3), 691–699.
Chang, R., Nam, J., & Sun, W. (2008). Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. Tissue Engineering Part A, 14(1), 41–48.
Cohen, D. L., et al. (2006). Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Engineering, 12(5), 1325–1335.
Owczarczak, A. B., et al. (2012). Creating transient cell membrane pores using a standard inkjet printer. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 61, e3681.
Jang, D., Kim, D., & Moon, J. (2009). Influence of fluid physical properties on ink-jet printability. Langmuir, 25(5), 2629–2635.
Khan, M. S., et al. (2010). Biosurface engineering through ink jet printing. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 75(2), 441–447.
Christensen, K., et al. (2015). Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 112(5), 1047–1055.
Saunders, R. E., Gough, J. E., & Derby, B. (2008). Delivery of human fibroblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand inkjet printing. Biomaterials, 29(2), 193–203.
Gao, G., & Cui, X. (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotechnology Letters, 38(2), 203–211.
Xu, T., et al. (2013). Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, 34(1), 130–139.
Cui, X., et al. (2010). Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 106(6), 963–969.
Ventola, C. L. (2014). Medical applications for 3D printing: Current and projected uses. P T, 39(10), 704–711.
Wust, S., Muller, R., & Hofmann, S. (2011). Controlled positioning of cells in biomaterials-approaches towards 3D tissue printing. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2(3), 119–154.
Lysaght, M. J., Jaklenec, A., & Deweerd, E. (2008). Great expectations: Private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics. Tissue Engineering Part A, 14(2), 305–315.
Cui, X., et al. (2012). Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Engineering Part A, 18(11–12), 1304–1312.
Chou, A. I., Akintoye, S. O., & Nicoll, S. B. (2009). Photo-crosslinked alginate hydrogels support enhanced matrix accumulation by nucleus pulposus cells in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 17(10), 1377–1384.
Chen, N., et al. (2012). Cell adhesion on an artificial extracellular matrix using aptamer-functionalized PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials, 33(5), 1353–1362.
Kwon, H., et al. (2016). Articular cartilage tissue engineering: The role of signaling molecules. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 73(6), 1173–1194.
Cui, X., & Boland, T. (2009). Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, 30(31), 6221–6227.
Smith, C. M., et al. (2004). Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Engineering, 10(9–10), 1566–1576.
Chang, C. C., & Hoying, J. B. (2006). Directed three-dimensional growth of microvascular cells and isolated microvessel fragments. Cell Transplantation, 15(6), 533–540.
Jakab, K., et al. (2006). Three-dimensional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology, 43(3–4), 509–513.
Norotte, C., et al. (2009). Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials, 30(30), 5910–5917.
Jakab, K., et al. (2008). Tissue engineering by self-assembly of cells printed into topologically defined structures. Tissue Engineering Part A, 14(3), 413–421.
Dellinger, J. G., Cesarano, J, 3rd, & Jamison, R. D. (2007). Robotic deposition of model hydroxyapatite scaffolds with multiple architectures and multiscale porosity for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 82(2), 383–394.
Lee, M., Dunn, J. C., & Wu, B. M. (2005). Scaffold fabrication by indirect three-dimensional printing. Biomaterials, 26(20), 4281–4289.
Smith, C. M., et al. (2007). Characterizing environmental factors that impact the viability of tissue-engineered constructs fabricated by a direct-write bioassembly tool. Tissue Engineering, 13(2), 373–383.
Gasperini, L., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2014). Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 11(100), 20140817.
Murphy, C. M., Haugh, M. G., & O’Brien, F. J. (2010). The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31(3), 461–466.
Engler, A. J., et al. (2006). Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 126(4), 677–689.
Williams, D. F. (2008). On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 29(20), 2941–2953.
Mason, C. (2007). Regenerative medicine 2.0. Regen Med, 2(1), 11–18.
Perez-Pomares, J. M., & Foty, R. A. (2006). Tissue fusion and cell sorting in embryonic development and disease: Biomedical implications. BioEssays, 28(8), 809–821.
Whitesides, G. M., & Grzybowski, B. (2002). Self-assembly at all scales. Science, 295(5564), 2418–2421.
Ozbolat, I. T., & Hospodiuk, M. (2016). Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials, 76, 321–343.
Barralet, J., et al. (2009). Angiogenesis in calcium phosphate scaffolds by inorganic copper ion release. Tissue Engineering Part A, 15(7), 1601–1609.
Borselli, C., et al. (2010). Bioactivation of collagen matrices through sustained VEGF release from PLGA microspheres. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 92(1), 94–102.
Author Contributions
SP and VY prepared the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patra, S., Young, V. A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue. Cell Biochem Biophys 74, 93–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-016-0730-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-016-0730-0