Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of SPE, IFE, and FLC in Monitoring Patients with Multiple Myeloma After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventionally, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are used as primary methods to diagnose and monitor multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, serum-free light chain (FLC) assay has been incorporated into hematological screening programs for myeloma. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the three methods in monitoring MM patients after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). SPE, serum IFE and serum FLC assay were performed on 38 MM patients who underwent ASCT. In total, four patients had unexpected protein bands (UPBs) and 13 patients had relapsed after ASCT. Our results indicate that IFE is more sensitive than SPE and FLC assay in detection of UPBs and relapse. The results of IFE may provide useful information in advance of patient relapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palumbo, A., Sezer, O., Kyle, R., et al. (2009). International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma patients ineligible for standard high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia, 23, 1716–1730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimopoulos, M., Terpos, E., Comenzo, R. L., et al. (2009). International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 23, 1545–1556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyle, R. A., & Rajkumar, S. V. (2009). Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 23, 3–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, S. K., Jeong, T. D., Kim, S. Y., et al. (2014). Characteristics of unexpected protein bands in multiple myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation. Clinical Biochemistry, 47, 588–592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abadie, J. M., & Bankson, D. D. (2006). Assessment of serum free light chain assays for plasma cell disorder screening in a Veterans Affairs population. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, 36, 157–162.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakshi, N. A., Gulbranson, R., Garstka, D., Bradwell, A. R., & Keren, D. F. (2005). Serum free light chain (FLC) measurement can aid capillary zone electrophoresis in detecting subtle FLC-producing M proteins. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 124, 214–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katzmann, J. A., Abraham, R. S., Dispenzieri, A., Lust, J. A., & Kyle, R. A. (2005). Diagnostic performance of quantitative kappa and lambda free light chain assays in clinical practice. Clinical Chemistry, 51, 878–881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katzmann, J. A., Clark, R. J., Abraham, R. S., et al. (2002). Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free kappa and free lambda immunoglobulin light chains: Relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clinical Chemistry, 48, 1437–1444.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchison, C. A., Plant, T., Drayson, M., et al. (2008). Serum free light chain measurement aids the diagnosis of myeloma in patients with severe renal failure. BMC Nephrology, 9, 11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levinson, S. S. (2011). Complementarily of urine analysis and serum free light chain assay for assessing response treatment response: Illustrated by three case examples. Clinica Chimica Acta: International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 412, 2206–2210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavo, M., & Baccarani, M. (2006). The changing landscape of myeloma therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 1076–1078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, S. K., Rajkumar, S. V., Dispenzieri, A., et al. (2008). Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood, 111, 2516–2520.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, S. L., Tate, J., Gill, D., & Mollee, P. (2009). Significance of abnormal protein bands in patients with multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, 30, 113–118.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zent, C. S., Wilson, C. S., Tricot, G., et al. (1998). Oligoclonal protein bands and Ig isotype switching in multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood, 91, 3518–3523.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hovenga, S., de Wolf, J. T., Guikema, J. E., et al. (2000). Autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after VAD and EDAP courses: A high incidence of oligoclonal serum Igs post transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 25, 723–728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abraham, R. S., Clark, R. J., Bryant, S. C., et al. (2002). Correlation of serum immunoglobulin free light chain quantification with urinary Bence Jones protein in light chain myeloma. Clinical Chemistry, 48, 655–657.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Durie, B. G., Harousseau, J. L., Miguel, J. S., et al. (2006). International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 20, 1467–1473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraj, M. (2014). Immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pairs (HLC, Hevylite) assays for diagnosing and monitoring monoclonal gammopathies. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine : Official Organ Wroclaw Medical University, 23, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bahlis, N. J. (2012). Darwinian evolution and tiding clones in multiple myeloma. Blood, 120, 927–928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Egan, J. B., Shi, C. X., Tembe, W., et al. (2012). Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. Blood, 120, 1060–1066.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker, B. A., Wardell, C. P., Melchor, L., et al. (2012). Intraclonal heterogeneity and distinct molecular mechanisms characterize the development of t(4;14) and t(11;14) myeloma. Blood, 120, 1077–1086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ayliffe, M. J., Behrens, J., Stern, S., & Sumar, N. (2012). Association of plasma cell subsets in the bone marrow and free light chain concentrations in the serum of monoclonal gammopathy patients. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 65, 758–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keats, J. J., Chesi, M., Egan, J. B., et al. (2012). Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma. Blood, 120, 1067–1076.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhnemund, A., Liebisch, P., Bauchmuller, K., et al. (2009). ‘Light-chain escape-multiple myeloma’-an escape phenomenon from plateau phase: Report of the largest patient series using LC-monitoring. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 135, 477–484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zamarin, D., Giralt, S., Landau, H., et al. (2013). Patterns of relapse and progression in multiple myeloma patients after auto-SCT: Implications for patients’ monitoring after transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 48, 419–424.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81472296, 81101867, 81272542, 81200369 and 81372443), Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science (BL2012005), Jiangsu Province’s Key Medical Center (ZX201102), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), National clinical key subject construction project, National Public Health Grand Research Foundation (No. 201202017), National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) (2011AA020105), the China International Medical Foundation (Grant No. CIMF–F–H001–057), the Medical Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Health (Grant No. Z201206), the Special Foundation of Wu Jieping Medical Foundation for Clinical Scientific Research (Grant Nos. 320.6753.1225 and 320.6750.12242) and a Project Founded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Conflict of interests

The authors claim no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fei-Ran Gong or De-Pei Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Zhou, JZ., Chang, HR. et al. Comparison of SPE, IFE, and FLC in Monitoring Patients with Multiple Myeloma After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Cell Biochem Biophys 73, 643–647 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0655-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0655-z

Keywords

Navigation