Skip to main content
Log in

Translaminar Screw Fixation in the Upper Thoracic Spine: Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Laminar Analysis and Feasibility Study of Translaminar Virtual Screw Placement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Translaminar screws (TLS) offer an alternative to pedicle screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. Although some studies have described the anatomy of the laminae at the upper thoracic spine, computed tomography (CT) imaging is the modality of choice for presurgical planning. The characteristics of upper thoracic lamina in healthy Han adults have not been ascertained for the safe placement of TLSs. To determine the measurements (the diameter, maximal screw length, and optimal screw trajectory) required for safe TLSs placement in the T1–3 by CT scan evaluation, forty patients (20 men, 20 women), age (48.2 ± 13.9) years (range 19–78 years), were involved in the study from December 2008 to June 2012. Patients received a standardized axial bone-window CT imaging at T1–3, and had no evidence of spinal trauma, bone defect, or deformity. For each lamina, the height, thickness (outer cortical and inner cancellous), maximal screw length, and the crossing angle of the lamina were measured using Syngo 3D software and statistically analyzed. There were no significant differences between the left and right sides for each of the measurements (P > 0.05), but significant differences were determined between males and females for some measurements. The thickness of the laminar outer cortical diameter for the axial reconstruction was higher than that for the sagittal reconstruction (P < 0.01). The T1 lamina was estimated to accommodate, on average, a 4.2-mm longer screw than the T2 lamina, and a 5.7-mm longer screw than the T3 lamina. Most laminae could accept a 4.0-mm screw with a 1.0-mm clearance. Thus, it is more reasonable and accurate to select screw sizes according to the measurement of laminar thickness in the parasagittal reconstruction of the CT scan. T1 crossing laminar screws were successfully placed, without impingement to the spinal canal. Based on the CT evaluation, there are no anatomical limitations to the placement of TLSs at T1–3 in Chinese patients. Gender differences were noted in the superior thoracic vertebrae for dimensions of the laminae, which must be considered when placing TLSs at these levels. The TLSs add to the surgeon’s armamentarium for instrumented fixation of the upper thoracic vertebrae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kretzer, R. M., Sciubba, D. M., Bagley, C. A., et al. (2006). Translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 5, 527–533.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, A., Millner, P., Liddington, M., et al. (2009). Translaminar screw fixation of a kyphosis of the cervical and thoracic spine in neurofibromatosis. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British, 91-B, 1252–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright, N. M. (2004). Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: Case series and technical note. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 17, 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel, A. J., Cherian, J., Fulkerson, D. H., et al. (2011). A computed tomography morphometric analysis for translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine of the pediatric population. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 7(4), 383–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso, M. J., Dmitriev, A. E., Lehman, R. A., et al. (2008). Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine, 33(24), 2612–2617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, M. Y. (2006). C2 crossing laminar screws: Cadaveric morphometric analysis. Neurosurgery, 59(1 Suppl), 2612–2617.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebraheim, N. A., Xu, R., Ahmad, M., et al. (1997). Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine, 22(3), 233–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ugur, H. C., Attar, A., Uz, A., et al. (2001). Thoracic pedicle: Surgical anatomic evaluation and relations. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 14, 39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardoso, M. J., Dmitriev, A. E., Helgeson, M. D., et al. (2009). Using laminar screws as a salvage technique at C-7: Computed tomography and biomechanical and analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 11, 28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grob, D., & Humke, T. (1998). Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine: Technique, indications, results. European Spine Journal, 7, 178–186.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hon, J. T., Sung, J. H., Son, B. C., et al. (2008). Significance of laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(16), 1739–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dean, C. L., Lee, M. J., Robbin, M., & Cassinelli, E. H. (2009). Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement. The Spine Journal, 9, 258–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassinelli, E. H., Lee, M., Skalak, A., et al. (2006). Anatomic considerations for the placement of C2 laminar screws. Spine, 31(24), 2767–2771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey, A. S., Stanescu, S., Yeasting, R. A., et al. (1995). Anatomic relationships of the cervicothoracic junction. Spine, 20(13), 1431–1439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, R., Burgar, A., Ebraheim, N. A., et al. (1999). The quantitative anatomy of the laminas of the spine. Spine, 24(2), 107–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chern, J. J., Chamoun, R. B., Whitehead, W. E., et al. (2009). Computed tomography morphometric analysis for axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 3(2), 121–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rao, B. R. D., Marawar, S. V., Stemper, B. D., et al. (2008). Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of subaxial cervical spine pedicles in young asymptomatic volunteers. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 90, 1914–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing-Feng Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, QF., Xu, RM., Pan, H. et al. Translaminar Screw Fixation in the Upper Thoracic Spine: Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Laminar Analysis and Feasibility Study of Translaminar Virtual Screw Placement. Cell Biochem Biophys 73, 191–198 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0618-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0618-4

Keywords

Navigation