Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 643–649 | Cite as

Effects of 900 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation on Skin Hydroxyproline Contents

  • Semra Tepe Çam
  • Nesrin Seyhan
  • Cengiz Kavaklı
  • Ömür Çelikbıçak
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the possible effect of pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) on rat skin hydroxyproline content, since skin is the first target of external electromagnetic fields. Skin hydroxyproline content was measured using liquid chromatography mass spectrometer method. Two months old male wistar rats were exposed to a 900 MHz pulse-modulated RFR at an average whole body specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1.35 W/kg for 20 min/day for 3 weeks. The radiofrequency (RF) signals were pulse modulated by rectangular pulses with a repetition frequency of 217 Hz and a duty cycle of 1:8 (pulse width 0.576 ms). A skin biopsy was taken at the upper part of the abdominal costa after the exposure. The data indicated that whole body exposure to a pulse-modulated RF radiation that is similar to that emitted by the global system for mobile communications (GSM) mobile phones caused a statistically significant increase in the skin hydroxyproline level (p = 0.049, Mann–Whitney U test). Under our experimental conditions, at a SAR less than the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection safety limit recommendation, there was evidence that GSM signals could alter hydroxyproline concentration in the rat skin.

Keywords

Radiofrequency radiation 900 MHz Skin Hydroxyproline Collagen LC MS/MS 

Abbreviations

RFR

Radiofrequency radiation

LC MS/MS

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometer

SAR

Specific absorption rate

RF

Radiofrequency

GSM

Global system for mobile communications

ICNIRP

International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection

EMR

Electromagnetic radiation

ELF

Extremely low frequency

APCI

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmadian, S., Zarchi, S. R., & Bolouri, B. (2006). Effects of extremely-low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on collagen synthesis in rat skin. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 43, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atalay Seyhan, N. (1995). Does electric field effect collagen synthesis in tissue. Gazi Medical Journal, 6, 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Autio, P., Saarto, T., Tenhunen, M., et al. (1998). Demonstration of increased collagen synthesis in irradiated human skin in vivo. British Journal of Cancer, 77, 2331–2335.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartsch, H., Bartsch, C., Seebald, E., et al. (2002). Chronic exposure to a GSM-like signal (mobile phone) does not stimulate the development of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rats: Results of three consecutive studies. Radiation Research, 157, 183–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canseven, A. G., & Atalay Seyhan, N. (1996). Is it possible to trigger the collagen synthesis by electric current in skin wounds? Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 33, 223–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caraglia, M., Marra, M., Mancinelli, F., et al. (2005). Electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency induce apoptosis and inactivation of the multi-chaperone complex in human epidermoid cancer cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 204, 539–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Çelik, S., Aridogan, I. A., Izol, V., et al. (2012). An evaluation of the effects of long-term cell phone use on the testes via light and electron microscope analysis. Urol, 79, 346–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Detlavs, I., Dombrovska, L., Turauska, A., et al. (1996). Experimental study of the effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals with soft tissue wounds. Science of the Total Environment, 180, 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ennamany, R., Fitoussi, R., Vie, K., et al. (2008). Exposure to electromagnetic radiation induces characteristic stress response in human epidermis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 128, 743–746.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farndale, R. W., & Murray, J. C. (1985). Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote collagen production in bone marrow fibroblasts via a thermal mechanisms. Calcified Tissue International, 37, 178–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, G. D., & Reagan, K. (1992). Determination of hydroxyproline by high pressure liquid chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry, 201, 265–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Güler, G., & Atalay Seyhan, N. (1996). Changes in hydroxyproline levels in electric field tissue interaction. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 33, 531–533.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Güler, G., Seyhan, Atalay N., Özoğul, C., et al. (1996). Biochemical and structural approach to collagen synthesis under electric fields. General Physiology and Biophysics, 15, 429–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heikkinen, P., Kosma, V. M., Alhonen, L., et al. (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic mice. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 79, 221–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirose, H., Sakuma, N., Kaji, N., et al. (2007). Mobile phone base station-emitted radiation does not induce phosphorylation of Hsp27. Bioelectromagnetics, 28, 99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, H. M., Lee, S. Y., Yao, W. C., et al. (2006). Static magnetic fields up-regulate osteoblast maturity by affecting local differentiation factors. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 447, 201–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Illsley, M. C., Peacock, J. H., McAnulty, R. J., et al. (2000). Increased collagen production in fibroblasts cultured from irradiated skin and effect of TGF β—clinical study. British Journal of Cancer, 83, 650–654.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Irmak, M. K., Oztas, E., Yagmurca, M., et al. (2003). Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular telephone on epidermal Merkel cells. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, 30, 135–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keshvari, J., & Lang, S. (2005). Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1,800 and 2,450 MHz. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 50, 4355–4369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keskikuru, R., Jukkola, A., Nuutinen, J., et al. (2004). Radiation-induced changes in skin type I and III collagen synthesis during and after conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 70, 243–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kindt, E., Gueneva-Boucheva, K., Rekhter, M. D., et al. (2003). Determination of hydroxyproline in plasma and tissue using electrospray mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 33, 1081–1092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leszczynski, D., Joenvaara, S., Reivinen, J., et al. (2002). Nonthermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: Molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. Different, 70, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Masuda, H., Sanchez, S., Dulou, P. E., et al. (2006). Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats. I: 2-h acute exposures. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 82, 669–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ottani, V., De Pasquale, V., Govoni, P., et al. (1988). Effects of pulsed extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields on skin wounds in the rat. Bioelectromagnetics, 9, 53–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozguner, F., Aydin, G., Mollaoglu, H., et al. (2004). Prevention of mobile phone induced skin tissue changes by melatonin in rat: An experimental study. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 20, 133–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pacini, S., Ruggiero, M., Sardi, I., et al. (2002). Exposure to global system for mobile communication (GSM) cellular phone radiofrequency alters gene expression, proliferation, and morphology of human skin fibroblasts. Oncology Research, 3, 19–24.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rakesh, S. (2009). Microimaging of hairless rat skin by magnetic resonance at 900 MHz. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27, 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riu, P. J., Foster, K. R., Blick, D. W., et al. (1997). A thermal model for human thresholds of microwave evoked warmth sensations. Bioelectromagnetics, 18, 578–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rodemann, P. H., Wecke, P., & Jaeschke, M. (1992). Low frequency electromagnetic fields induce premature terminal differentiation of in vitro cultured human skin and lung fibroblasts. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 342, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sakai, Y., Patterson, T. E., Ibiwoye, M. O., et al. (2006). Exposure of mouse preosteoblasts to pulsed electromagnetic fields reduces the amount of mature, type I collagen in the extracellular matrix. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 24, 242–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanchez, S., Masuda, H., Billaudel, B., et al. (2006). Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats. II: 12-week chronic exposures. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 82, 675–680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanchez, S., Masuda, H., Ruffié, G., et al. (2008). Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats. III: Expression of heat shock proteins. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 84, 61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sassi, M., Jukkola, A., Riekki, R., et al. (2001). Type I collagen turnover and cross-linking are increased in irradiated skin of breast cancer patients. Radiotherapy Oncology, 58, 317–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sato, T., Yokoyama, H., Ohya, H., et al. (1999). Electrically detected magnetic resonance signal intensity at resonant frequencies from 300 to 900 MHz in a constant microwave field. J Mag Reson, 139, 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seyhan, N., & Canseven, A. G. (2006). In vivo effects of ELF MFs on collagen synthesis, free radical processes, natural antioxidant system, respiratory burst system, immune system activities, and electrolytes in the skin, plasma, spleen, lung, kidney, and brain tissues. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25, 291–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Seyhan, N., & Güler, G. (2006). Review of in vivo static and ELF electric fields studies performed at Gazi Biophysics Department. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25, 307–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seyhan, N., Güler, G., Canseven, A. G., et al. (2010). Investigation on blood-brain barrier permeability and collagen synthesis under radiofrequency radiation exposure and SAR simulations of adult and child head. European Journal of Oncology, 5, 319–332.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sidney, U. (1966). Formation of hydroxyproline in collagen. Science, 152, 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Soga, T., & Heiger, D. N. (2000). Amino acid analysis by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 72, 1236–1241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stegemann, H., Stalder, K., Bernhard, G., & Hoppe- Seyler’s, Z. (1964). Über die isomerisierung von hydroxyprolin. Physiology Chemistry, 337, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tepe Çam, S., & Seyhan, N. (2012). Single-strand DNA breaks in human hair root cells exposed to mobile phone radiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, 88, 420–424.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Velizarov, S., Raskmark, P., & Kwee, S. (1999). The effects of radiofrequency fields on cell proliferation are non-thermal. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 48, 177–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Woessner, J. F. (1961). The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 93, 240–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Semra Tepe Çam
    • 1
  • Nesrin Seyhan
    • 1
  • Cengiz Kavaklı
    • 2
  • Ömür Çelikbıçak
    • 2
  1. 1. Biophysics Department, Faculty of MedicineGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Chemistry DepartmentHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations