Skip to main content
Log in

Pedicled Greater Omentum Graft: A New Technique to Repair Recurrent Urinary Fistulae After Kidney Transplantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urinary fistula is the most frequent urologic complication within the first month after kidney transplantation, which often leads to graft loss and mortality. Open surgery is the most popular approach for the treatment of these fistulae; however, it is associated with high failure rates. Here, we present a new technique of pedicled greater omentum graft to repair recurrent urinary fistulae after kidney transplantation. We used this technique in the repair of recurrent urinary fistulae in 13 post-kidney transplant patients. All operations were successful at the first attempt, and there was no fistula recurrence. Further, no complications associated with the technique have been observed during the follow-up (1–7 years). In conclusion, the use of pedicled greater omentum graft for the repair of recurrent urinary fistulae after kidney transplantation is both effective and safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gogus, C., Yaman, O., Soygur, T., Beduk, Y., & Gogus, O. (2002). Urological complications in renal transplantation: Long-term follow-up of the Woodruff ureteroneocystostomy procedure in 433 patients. Urologia Internationalis, 69, 99–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, M. V., Filocamo, M. T., Dattolo, E., Zanazzi, M., Paoletti, M. C., Marzocco, M., et al. (2005). The treatment of fistulae and ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings, 37, 2516–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heap, S., Mehra, S., Tavakoli, A., Augustine, T., Riad, H., & Pararajasingam, R. (2010). Negative pressure wound therapy used to heal complex urinary fistula wounds following renal transplantation into an ileal conduit. American Journal of Transplantation, 10, 2370–2373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nie, Z. L., Zhang, K. Q., Li, Q. S., Jin, F. S., Zhu, F. Q., & Huo, W. Q. (2009). Treatment of urinary fistula after kidney transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings, 41, 1624–1626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saifzadeh, S., Pourreza, B., Hobbenaghi, R., Naghadeh, B. D., & Kazemi, S. (2009). Autogenous greater omentum, as a free nonvascularized graft, enhances bone healing: An experimental nonunion model. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 22, 129–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, A. K., Pancholi, N., Patel, J., Litbarg, N. O., Gudehithlu, K. P., Sethupathi, P., et al. (2009). Omentum facilitates liver regeneration. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 15, 1057–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, J. Y., Kim, Y. W., Kim, C. J., Lim, H. I., Kim, D. I., & Huh, S. (2007). Successful surgical treatment of aortoenteric fistula. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 22, 846–850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parnitvitidkun, S. (2006). Urological complications in gynecologic and obstetric operations at Surin Hospital. THAI Journal of Surgery, 27, 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Battaglia, M., Ditonno, P., Selvaggio, O., Palazzo, S., Bettocchi, C., Peschechera, R., et al. (2005). Double J stent with antireflux device in the prevention of short-term urological complications after cadaveric kidney transplantation: Single-center prospective randomized study. Transplantation Proceedings, 37, 2525–2526.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangus, R. S., & Haag, B. W. (2004). Stented versus nonstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: A metaanalysis. American Journal of Transplantation, 4, 1889–1896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzucchi, E., Souza, G. L., Hisano, M., Antonopoulos, I. M., Piovesan, A. C., Nahas, W. C., et al. (2006). Primary reconstruction is a good option in the treatment of urinary fistula after kidney transplantation. International journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, 32, 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinckan, A., Tekin, A., Turkyilmaz, S., Kocak, H., Gurkan, A., Erdogan, O., et al. (2007). Early and late urological complications corrected surgically following renal transplantation. Transplant International, 20, 702–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duffill, J., Buckley, J., Lang, D., Neil-Dwyer, G., McGinn, F., & Wade, D. (2001). Prospective study of omental transposition in patients with chronic spinal injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 71, 73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesznyak, T., Nemeth, N., Brath, E., Peto, K., Pekar, G., Nagy, D., et al. (2005). Kidney neovascularization by the greater omentum after pretreatment with omental angiogenic factor. Magyar Sebeszet, 58, 129–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalela, D., Gupta, V. P., Goel, A., & Singh, K. M. (2004). Omental wrap around the renal pedicle: An adjunctive step to minimize morbidity and recurrence after lymphorenal disconnection for chyluria. British Journal of Urology International, 94, 673–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohring, K., & Pomer, S. (1991). Preventive use of pedicled omentum majus within the scope of kidney transplantation. Helvetica Chirurgica Acta, 58, 265–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenqian Huo.

Additional information

Jin YE and Qiansheng LI contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, J., Li, Q., Liu, R. et al. Pedicled Greater Omentum Graft: A New Technique to Repair Recurrent Urinary Fistulae After Kidney Transplantation. Cell Biochem Biophys 62, 69–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-011-9260-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-011-9260-y

Keywords

Navigation