Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An ICP-MS Study for Quantitation of Nickel and Other Inorganic Elements in Urine Samples: Correlation of Patch Test Results with Lifestyle Habits

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) is a frequently used metal in the production of many products, and Ni exposure occurs in humans through food, inhalation, and skin. Studies reported Ni as the most common allergen diagnosed in the serial patch test. The main purpose of our study was to determine the concentration of Ni and other elements in the urine samples of individuals with Ni-sensitivity and to determine the effect of lifestyle habits on these variables. This study was conducted with 388 participants; additionally, both Ni patch test and inorganic analysis (for 24 elements) method in urine with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied to all participants. Ninety-two (23.7%) of the participants were found to have nickel sensitivity with a mean urine concentration of 4.475 μg/g creatinine (median=4.260; SD=2.527). The urine nickel concentration was significantly different between female and male participants (p =0.001). We found a significant correlation between Ni and other metals alongside various element pairs. The mean urine Ni concentration of the individuals with a positive Ni sensitivity test result was not different from that of the participants without Ni sensitivity (4.475 vs 4.256 μg/g creatinine, respectively; p = 0.068). The high accuracy, recovery, and repeatability data obtained from the analyses indicate that this study is efficient and appropriate for the quantitative determination of nickel and other elements in urine samples. Ni-containing objects and Ni-rich foods should be of concern for individuals with hypersensitivity reactions to the element.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Genchi G, Carocci A, Lauria G, Sinicropi MS, Catalano A (2020) Nickel: human health and environmental toxicology. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(3):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030679

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron KS, Buchner V, Tchounwou PB (2011) Exploring the molecular mechanisms of nickel-induced genotoxicity and carcinogenicity: a literature review. Rev Environ Health 26(2):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh.2011.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cempel M, Nikel G (2006) Nickel: a review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Pol J Environ Stud 15(3):375–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (2019) Nickel in drinking-water draft background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. 1-26. Available at: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/water-quality/guidelines/chemicals/draft-Ni-190924.pdf Last accessed: 12/06/2020

  5. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E (2002) Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 46(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460104.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ertam I, Turkmen M, Alper S (2008) Patch-test results of an academic department in Izmir, Turkey. Dermatitis 19(4):213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg S, Thyssen JP, Uter W, Schnuch A, Johansen JD, Menné T, Belloni Fortina A, Statham B, Gawkrodger DJ (2013) Nickel allergy following European Union regulation in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the U.K. Br J Dermatol 169(4):854–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torres F, das Graças M, Melo M, Tosti A (2009) Management of contact dermatitis due to Nickel allergy: an update. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2:39–48. https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s3693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Türk Dermatoloji Derneği. Dermatoalerji Çalışma Grubu Deri Yama Testi Hasta Bilgilendirme Formu. Available at: http://turkdermatoloji.org.tr/media/files/file/pdf/Nikel_bilgilendirme_2012.pdf Last accessed: 12/06/2020

  10. EFSA CONTAM Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain), Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman JK, del Mazo J, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Leblanc J-C, Nebbia CS, Ntzani E, Petersen A, Sand S, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Wallace H, Guerin T, Massanyi P, Van Loveren H, Baert K, Gergelova P, Nielsen E (2020) Scientific opinion on the update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water. EFSA J 18(11):6268, 101 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl 101:133–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2019) Biological responses to metal implants. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/131150/download Last accessed: 12/06/2020

  13. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A (2003) Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel– results of a multifactorial analysis. Contact Dermatitis 48:33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasper-Sonnenberg M, Sugiri D, Wurzler S, Ranft U, Dickel H, Wittsiepe J, Hölzer J, Lemm F, Eberwein G, Altmeyer P, Kraft M, Krämer U, Wilhelm M (2011) Prevalence of nickel sensitization and urinary nickel content of children are increased by nickel in ambient air. Environ Res 111(2):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2010.11.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Darsow U, Fedorov M, Schwegler U, Twardella D, Schaller KH, Habernegg R, Fromme H, Ring J, Behrendt H (2012) Influence of dietary factors, age and nickel contact dermatitis on nickel excretion. Contact Dermatitis 67(6):351–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02153.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis. On behalf of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group and the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2nd edn. Munksgaard Publishers, Copenhagen

  17. Mercan S (2020) A comprehensive artificial sweat study for quantitation of nickel and other inorganic elements released from imitation earrings purchased in Istanbul market. Biol Trace Elem Res 194(1):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02042-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnuch A, Wolter J, Geier J, Uter W (2011) Nickel allergy is still frequent in young German females – probably because of insufficient protection from nickel-releasing objects. Contact Dermatitis 64:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thyssen J, Menne T, Lidén C et al (2011) Excessive nickel release from earrings purchased from independent shops and street markets – a field study from Warsaw and London. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 25:1021–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Biesterbos J, Lidén C, van der Valk P (2011) Nickel on the Dutch market: 10 years after entry into force of the EU Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis 65:115–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boonchai W, Maneeprasopchoke P, Suiwongsa B, Kasemsarn P (2015) Assessment of nickel and cobalt release from jewelry from a non-Nickel directive country. Dermatitis. 26(1):44–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mercan S (2019) Determination of nickel as an allergic contact dermatitis source from imitation jewelry by dimethylglyoxime (DMG) test. Osmangazi J Med 41(4):397–404. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.489500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cristaudo A, Petrucci F, Giannarelli D, Cercato MC, Orsini D, Morrone A, Bocca B (2019) Nickel dermatitis from earrings 15 years after EU directive implementation: a clinical-epidemiological study and a market survey in Rome, Italy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33(10):1928–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Antico A, Soana R (2015) Nickel sensitization and dietary nickel are a substantial cause of symptoms provocation in patients with chronic allergic-like dermatitis syndromes. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 6(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.2500/ar.2015.6.0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD (2019) Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: a clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis 81(4):227–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma AD (2013) Low nickel diet in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol 58(3):240. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110846

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Krstić B, Stanković D, Igić R, Nikolic N (2007) The potential of different plant species for nickel accumulation. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 21(4):431–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2007.10817489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mazzafera P, Tezotto T, Polacco JC (1990) Nickel in Plants. In: Kretsinger RH, Uversky VN, Permyakov EA (eds) Encyclopedia of metalloproteins, vol 1. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mudjari S, Achmad MH, Singgih MF, Rieuwpassa IE, Akbar FH (2019) Nickel and chromium ion levels in hair and gingival crevicular fluid with the corrosion of brackets in orthodontic patients: a longitudinal study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr 19:e4546. https://doi.org/10.4034/pboci.2019.191.64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamann D, Thyssen JP, Hamann CR, Hamann C, Menné T, Johansen JD, Spiewak R, Maibach H, Lundgren L, Lidén C (2015) Jewellery: alloy composition and release of nickel, cobalt and lead assessed with the EU synthetic sweat method. Contact Dermatitis 73(4):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Duarte I, Mendonça R, Korles K, Lazzarini R, Hafner R (2016) Nickel, chromium and cobalt: the prevalence of occupational and nonoccupational sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 75:78–78

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richter PA, Bishop EE, Wang J, Swahn MH (2009) Tobacco smoke exposure and levels of urinary metals in the U.S. youth and adult population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(7):1930–1946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6071930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Sharrett R, Calderon-Aranda E, Selvin E, Guallar E (2005) Metals in urine and peripheral arterial disease. Environ Health Perspect 113(2):164–169. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saravanabhavan G, Werry K, Walker M, Haines D, Malowany M, Khoury C (2017) Human biomonitoring reference values for metals and trace elements in blood and urine derived from the Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007-2013. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220(2 Pt A):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.10.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and Scientific Research Fund of Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Turkey, for support of this work with the Project numbers 213S098 and BYP-54488, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selda Mercan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Nickel is a metal with a main source of exposure in water, foods, and daily equipment.

• Occupational exposure to nickel is frequent.

• The mean urine nickel concentration of the female participants was significantly higher than males’, possibly as a result of their daily habitual exposure to cosmetic products and imitation jewelry.

• The nickel concentration in the urine increased with an occupational contact.

• The nickel concentrations in the urine samples of the participants who used penetrating jewelry such as earrings and piercings were significantly higher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mercan, S., Vehid, H., Semen, S. et al. An ICP-MS Study for Quantitation of Nickel and Other Inorganic Elements in Urine Samples: Correlation of Patch Test Results with Lifestyle Habits. Biol Trace Elem Res 200, 49–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02636-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02636-y

Keywords

Navigation