Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation of Bull Semen Processed with Zinc (Zn) Nanoparticles

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defective sperms cause fertilization failure under both in vivo and in vitro conditions. Therefore, providing optimal conditions during semen storage is a prerequisite for maintaining viability. The current study investigated bull semen quality in vitro and in vivo when zinc (Zn) nanoparticles were used as antioxidant during semen processing and cryopreservation. In total, 32 ejaculates were collected from four Holstein bulls. All ejaculates were pooled and diluted with Bioxcell-extender containing 0 (control group), 10−6, 10−5, 10−4, 10−3, and 10−2 M of Zn nanoparticles. Several physical and biochemical sperm parameters were determined after freeze-thawing process. In vitro embryo development rate and pregnancy rate were monitored after in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination using semen treated with Zn nanoparticles. Plasma membrane integrity was improved (P < 0.05) in bull semen treated with 10−6 M (69.3%), and 10−2 (62.4%) of Zn nanoparticles compared to untreated group (51.3%). In addition, proportions of live spermatozoa with active mitochondria were increased (P < 0.05) in semen supplemented with Zn nanoparticles at concentration of 10−6 M (67.3%), and 10−2 (85.3%) compared to control group (49.8%). Moreover, the level of MDA was lower (P < 0.05) in semen with Zn nanoparticles at 10−6 M (2.97 mol/mL) and 10−2 (2.7 mol/mL) concentrations than control semen samples (3.77 mol/mL). However, sperm total and progressive motility, sperm viability, DNA fragmentation, and pregnancy rate were not affected by treatment of semen with Zn nanoparticles. On the other hand, supplementation of in vitro maturation media with 10−6 M Zn nanoparticles has increased blastocyst rate (P < 0.05) compared to other experimental groups, while addition of Zn nanoparticles-treated sperm during in vitro fertilization did not affect embryo development rate. In conclusion, supplementation of Zn nanoparticles to semen has improved its quality without affecting embryo development rate in vitro. However, in vitro embryo development rate was increased when Zn nanoparticles were supplemented to IVM media. This support the notion of Zn nanoparticles beneficial action on improving bovine gametes quality without affecting pregnancy rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karaji RO, Kia HD, Ashrafi I (2014) Effects of in combination antioxidant supplementation on microscopic and oxidative parameters of freeze–thaw bull sperm. Cell Tissue Bank 15:461–470

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woelders H, Matthijs A, Engel B (1997) Effects of trehalose and sucrose, osmolality of the freezing medium, and cooling rate on viability and intactness of bull sperm after freezing and thawing. Cryobiology 35:93–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumber J, Ball BA, Linfor JJ, Meyers SA (2003) Reactive oxygen species and cryopreservation promote DNA fragmentation in equine spermatozoa. J Androl 24:621–628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li MW, Meyers S, Tollner TL, Overstreet JW (2007) Damage to chromosomes and DNA of rhesus monkey sperm following cryopreservation. J Androl 28:493–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal A, Said TM (2003) Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 9:331–345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Occhio M, Hengstberger K, Johnston S (2007) Biology of sperm chromatin structure and relationship to male fertility and embryonic survival. Anim Reprod Sci 101:1–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Celeghini E, De Arruda R, De Andrade A, Nascimento J, Raphael C (2007) Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Reprod Domest Anim 42:479–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal A, Virk G, Ong C, du Plessis SS (2014) Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J Men’s Health 32:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes S, Jurisicova A, Sun JG, Casper RF (1998) Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13:896–900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, Hedges A, McLachlan RI (2010) Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod 25:2415–2426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumber J, Ball BA, Gravance CG, Medina V, Davies-Morel MC (2000) The effect of reactive oxygen species on equine sperm motility, viability, acrosomal integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and membrane lipid peroxidation. J Androl 21:895–902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kao SH, Chao H, Chen HW, Hwang TI, Liao TL, Wei YH (2008) Increase of oxidative stress in human sperm with lower motility. Fertil Steril 89:1183–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jervis KM, Robaire B (2004) The effects of long term vitamin E treatment on gene expression and oxidative stress damage in the aging Brown Norway rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 71:1088–1095

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin J, Jin N, Zheng H, Ro S, Tafolla D, Sanders KM, Yan W (2007) Catsper3 and Catsper4 are essential for sperm hyperactivated motility and male fertility in the mouse. Biol Reprod 77:37–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krausz C, Mills C, Rogers S, Tan S, Aitken RJ (1994) Stimulation of oxidant generation by human sperm suspensions using phorbol esters and formyl peptides: relationships with motility and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 62:599–605

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez-Partida L, Setchell B, Maxwell W (1998) Epididymal compounds and antioxidants in diluents for the frozen storage of ram spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 9:689–696

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ménézo YJ, Hazout A, Panteix G, Robert F, Rollet J, Cohen-Bacrie P, Chapuis F, Clément P, Benkhalifa M (2007) Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod BioMed Online 14:418–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malo C, Gil L, Gonzalez N, Martínez F, Cano R, De Blas I, Espinosa E (2010) Anti-oxidant supplementation improves boar sperm characteristics and fertility after cryopreservation: comparison between cysteine and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis). Cryobiology 61:142–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang W, Yi K, Chen C, Hou X, Zhou X (2012) Application of antioxidants and centrifugation for cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 132:123–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Atashfaraz E, Farokhi F, Najafi G (2013) Protective effect of ethyl pyruvate on epididymal sperm characteristics, oxidative stress and testosterone level in methotrexate treated mice. J Reprod Infertil 14:190–196

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zanganeh Z, Zhandi M, Zare-Shahneh A, Najafi A, Nabi MM, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A (2013) Does rosemary aqueous extract improve buck semen cryopreservation? Small Rumin Res 114:120–125

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zalata A, Elhanbly S, Abdalla H, Serria M, Aziz A, El-Dakrooy S, El-Bakary AA, Mostafa T (2014) In vitro study of cypermethrin on human spermatozoa and the possible protective role of vitamins C and E. Andrologia 46:1141–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarıözkan S, Tuncer P, Büyükleblebici S, Bucak M, Cantürk F, Eken A (2015) Antioxidative effects of cysteamine, hyaluronan and fetuin on post-thaw semen quality, DNA integrity and oxidative stress parameters in the Brown Swiss bull. Andrologia 47:138–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barkhordari A, Hekmatimoghaddam S, Jebali A, Khalili MA, Talebi A, Noorani M (2013) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on viability of human spermatozoa. Int J Reprod BioMed 11:767–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kobyliak NM, Falalyeyeva TM, Kuryk OG, Beregova TV, Bodnar PM, Zholobak NM, Shcherbakov OB, Bubnov RV, Spivak MY (2015) Antioxidative effects of cerium dioxide nanoparticles ameliorate age-related male infertility: optimistic results in rats and the review of clinical clues for integrative concept of men health and fertility. EPMA J 6:12

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiwanitkit V, Sereemaspun A, Rojanathanes R (2009) Effect of gold nanoparticles on spermatozoa: the first world report. Fertil Steril 91:e7–e8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ema M, Kobayashi N, Naya M, Hanai S, Nakanishi J (2010) Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of manufactured nanomaterials. Reprod Toxicol 30:343–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Philbrook NA, Winn LM, Afrooz AN, Saleh NB, Walker VK (2011) The effect of TiO 2 and Ag nanoparticles on reproduction and development of Drosophila melanogaster and CD-1 mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 257:429–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picco SJ, Anchordoquy JM, de Matos DG, Anchordoquy JP, Seoane A, Mattioli GA, Errecalde AL, Furnus CC (2010) Effect of increasing zinc sulphate concentration during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 74:1141–1148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Anchordoquy JM, Picco SJ, Seoane A, Anchordoquy JP, Ponzinibbio MV, Mattioli GA, Peral García P, Furnus CC (2011) Analysis of apoptosis and DNA damage in bovine cumulus cells after exposure in vitro to different zinc concentrations. Cell Biol Int 35:593–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anchordoquy JM, Anchordoquy JP, Sirini MA, Picco SJ, Peral-García P, Furnus CC (2014) The importance of having zinc during in vitro maturation of cattle cumulus-oocyte complex: role of cumulus cells. Reprod Domest Anim 49:865–874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wooldridge LK, Nardi ME, Ealy AD (2019) Zinc supplementation during in vitro embryo culture increases inner cell mass and total cell numbers in bovine blastocysts. J Anim Sci 97:4946–4950

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Caldamone AA, Freytag MK, Cockett AT, Cockett T (1979) Seminal zinc and male infertility. Urology 13:280–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chia SE, Ong CN, Chua LH, Ho LM, Tay SK (2000) Comparison of zinc concentrations in blood and seminal plasma and the various sperm parameters between fertile and infertile men. J Androl 21:53–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Colagar AH, Marzony ET, Chaichi MJ (2009) Zinc levels in seminal plasma are associated with sperm quality in fertile and infertile men. Nutr Res 29:82–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Agarwal A, Aponte-Mellado A, Premkumar BJ, Shaman A, Gupta S (2012) The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10:49

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Song Y, Leonard SW, Traber MG, Ho E (2009) Zinc deficiency affects DNA damage, oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and DNA repair in rats. J Nutr 139:1626–1631

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zou T, Liu X, Ding S, Xing J (2010) Evaluation of sperm mitochondrial function using rh123/PI dual fluorescent staining in asthenospermia and oligoasthenozoospermia. J Biomed Res 24:404–410

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dodaran HV, Zhandi M, Sharafi M, Nejati-Amiri E, Nejati-Javaremi A, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, Mohamed Mahmoud Shehab-El-Deen MA, Shakeri M (2015) Effect of ethanol induced mild stress on post-thawed bull sperm quality. Cryobiology 71:12–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, Veshkini A, Hajarizadeh A, Jamshidi-Adegani F, Zhandi M, Abazari-kia AH, Cinar MU, Soleimani M, Gastal EL (2014) Association of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity with oocyte cytoplasmic lipid content, developmental competence, and expression of candidate genes in a sheep model. J Assist Reprod Genet 31:1089–1098

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Danscher G, Hammen R, Fjerdingstad E, Rebbe H (1978) Zinc content of human ejaculate and the motility of sperm cells. Int J Androl 1:576–581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fuse H, Kazama T, Ohta S, Fujiuchi Y (1999) Relationship between zinc concentrations in seminal plasma and various sperm parameters. Int Urol Nephrol 31:401–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mankad M, Sathawara N, Doshi H, Saiyed H, Kumar S (2006) Seminal plasma zinc concentration and α-glucosidase activity with respect to semen quality. Biol Trace Elem Res 110:97–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ebisch I, Thomas C, Peters W, Braat D, Steegers-Theunissen R (2007) The importance of folate, zinc and antioxidants in the pathogenesis and prevention of subfertility. Hum Reprod Update 13:163–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stanković H, Mikac-Devi D (1976) Zinc and copper in human semen. Clin Chim Acta 70:123–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stoltenberg M, Sørensen MB, Danscher G, Juhl S, Andreasen A, Ernst E (1997) Autometallographic demonstration of zinc ions in rat sperm cells. Mol Hum Reprod 3:763–767

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sørensen MB, Stoltenberg M, Henriksen K, Ernst E, Danscher G, Parvinen M (1998) Histochemical tracing of zinc ions in the rat testis. Mol Hum Reprod 4:423–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yamaguchi S, Miura C, Kikuchi K, Celino FT, Agusa T, Tanabe S, Miura T (2009) Zinc is an essential trace element for spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:10859–10864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Elgazar V, Razanov V, Stoltenberg M, Hershfinkel M, Huleihel M, Nitzan YB, Lunenfeld E, Sekler I, Silverman WF (2005) Zinc-regulating proteins, ZnT-1, and metallothionein I/II are present in different cell populations in the mouse testis. J Histochem Cytochem 53:905–912

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Omu A, Al-Azemi M, Kehinde E, Anim J, Oriowo M, Mathew T (2008) Indications of the mechanisms involved in improved sperm parameters by zinc therapy. Med Princ Pract 17:108–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Contri A, De Amicis I, Molinari A, Faustini M, Gramenzi A, Robbe D, Carluccio A (2011) Effect of dietary antioxidant supplementation on fresh semen quality in stallion. Theriogenology 75:1319–1326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sørensen MB, Stoltenberg M, Danscher G, Ernst E (1999) Chelation of intracellular zinc ions affects human sperm cell motility. Mol Hum Reprod 15:338–341

    Google Scholar 

  53. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE (2006) Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 65:178–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Eid L, Lorton S, Parrish J (1994) Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo. Biol Reprod 51:1232–1237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ross C, Morriss A, Khairy M, Khalaf Y, Braude P, Coomarasamy A, El-Toukhy T (2010) A systematic review of the effect of oral antioxidants on male infertility. Reprod BioMed Online 20:711–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gharagozloo P, Aitken RJ (2011) The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of oral antioxidant therapy. Hum Reprod 26:1628–1640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of their own laboratories for their helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasser Ghanem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahanbin, R., Yazdanshenas, P., Rahimi, M. et al. In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation of Bull Semen Processed with Zinc (Zn) Nanoparticles. Biol Trace Elem Res 199, 126–135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02153-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02153-4

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Eva Tvrda