Skip to main content
Log in

Total Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish in Market of the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mercury concentration was quantified in frozen and canned fish found in the market of the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Using the method of amalgamation by atomic absorption spectrophotometry with a direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80), significant differences in mercury concentrations among the analyzed fish were found. Frozen pangasius and canned tuna had the highest mercury concentration (59.1 μg/kg and 54.1 μg/kg, respectively). Also, fish from Vietnam had the highest level of total mercury in comparison to fish from other countries. Determined levels of mercury in our samples were below the limit set by the European and Bosnian and Herzegovinian legislation (500 μg/kg wet weight). We have concluded that consumption of commercial fish in the market of the Republic of Srpska does not present any health risk for the average consumer. Nevertheless, a surveillance system of mercury content in fishery products, especially in certain species that concentrate mercury, is crucial for public health protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US-EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2015) Mercury emission. https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator_pdf.cfm?i=14. Accessed 2 February 2019

  2. AMAP/EUNEP (2013) Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013, Arctic Montoringand Assessment Programme, Oslo. Norway/UNEP ChemicalsBranch, Geneva vi+263 pp

    Google Scholar 

  3. US - FDA (U.S. Food & Drug Administration) (2017b) Technical Information on Development of Fish Consupmtion Advice- FDA/EPA Advice on What Pregnant Women and Parents Should Know About Eating Fish. https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm531136.htm. Accessed 27 January 2019

  4. Castaño A, Cutanda F, Esteban M, Pärt P, Navarro C, Gómez S, Rosado M, López A, López E, Exley K, Schindler BK, Govarts E, Casteleyn L, Kolossa-Gehring M, Fiddicke U, Koch H, Angerer J, Hond ED, Schoeters G, Sepai O, Horvat M, Knudsen LE, Aerts D, Joas A, Biot P, Joas R, Jiménez-Guerrero JA, Diaz G, Pirard C, Katsonouri A, Cerna M, Gutleb AC, Ligocka D, Reis FM, Berglund M, Lupsa IR, Halzlová K, Charlier C, Cullen E, Hadjipanayis A, Krsková A, Jensen JF, Nielsen JK, Schwedler G, Wilhelm M, Rudnai P, Középesy S, Davidson F, Fischer ME, Janasik B, Namorado S, Gurzau AE, Jajcaj M, Mazej D, Tratnik JS, Larsson K, Lehmann A, Crettaz P, Lavranos G, Posada M (2015) Fish consumption patterns and hair mercury levels in children and their mothers in 17 EU countries. Environ Res 141:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2012) Scientific opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food, EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Parma, Italy. EFSA J 10(12):2985

    Google Scholar 

  6. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2014) Scientific opinion on health benefits of seafood (fish and shellfish) consumption in relation to health risks associated with exposure to methylmercury, EFSA Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA), Parma, Italy. EFSA J 12(7):3761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. US-EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) U.S. EPA method 7473 (2007) Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. USEPA, Washington, DC https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/epa-7473.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Committee, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olmedo P, Pla A, Hernández AF, Barbier F, Ayouni L, Gil F (2013) Determination of toxic elements (mercury, cadmium, lead, tin and arsenic) in fish and shellfish samples. Risk assessment for the consumers. Environ Int 59:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2006) Mercury in fish available in supermarkets in Illinois: are there regional differences. Sci Total Environ 367:1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.04.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fairey R, Taberski K, Lamerdin S, Johnson E, Clark RP, Downing JW, Newman J, Petreas M (1997) Organochlorines and other environmental contaminants in muscle tissue of sportfish collected from San Francisco Bay. Mar Pollut Bull 34:1058–1071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burger J, Gaines KF, Boring CS, Stephens WL Jr, Snodgrass J, Gochfeld M (2001) Mercury and selenium in fish from the Savannah River: species, trophic level, and locational differences. Environ Res 87:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2001.4294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burger J, Gaines KF, Gochfeld M (2001) Ethnic differences in risk from mercury among Savannah River fishermen. Risk Anal 21:533–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.213130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bidone ED, Castilhos ZC, Santos TJS, Souza TMC, Lacerda LD (1997) Fish contamination and human exposure to mercury in Tartarugalzinho River, Northern Amazon, Brazil. A screening approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 97:9–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Green NW, Knutzen J (2003) Organohalogens and metals in marine fish and mussels and some relationships to biological variables at reference localities in Norway. Mar Pollut Bull 46:362–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00515-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munthe J, Bodaly RA, Branfireun BA et al (2007) Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36:33–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. EC (European Commission) (2011) Commission Regulation (EU) No 420/2011 of 29 April 2011. Amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur union L 111:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Regulation on maximum permissible quantities for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (“Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, no. 68/14), 2014. http://www.fsa.gov.ba/fsa/images/pravni-propisi/sr-Pravilnik_o_maksimalno_dozvoljenim_količinama_za_određene_kontaminante_u_hrani_68-14.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019

  19. Kimáková T, Kuzmová L, Nevolná Z, Bencko V (2018) Fish and fish products as risk factors of mercury exposure. Ann Agric Environ Med 25:488–493. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/84934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Storelli MM, Barone G, Cuttone G, Giungato D, Garofalo R (2010) Occurrence of toxic metals (Hg, Cd and Pb) in fresh and canned tuna: public health implications. Food Chem Toxicol 48:3167–3170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrantelli V, Giangrosso G, Cicero A, Naccari C, Macaluso A, Galvano F, D’Orazio N, Arcadipane GE, Naccari F (2012) Evaluation of mercury levels in Pangasius and Cod fillets traded in Sicily (Italy). Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 29:1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2012.675595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez M, Gutiérrez ÁJ, Rodríguez N, Rubio C, Paz S, Martín V, Revert C, Hardisson A (2017) Assessment of mercury content in Panga (Pangasius hypophthalmus). Chemosphere 196:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Little DC, Bush SR, Belton B, Phuong NT, Young JA, Murray FJ (2012) Whitefish wars: pangasius, politics and consumer confusion in Europe. Mar Policy 36:738–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Orban E, Nevigato T, Di Lena G et al (2008) New trends in the sea food market. Sutchi catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus) fillets from Vietnam: nutritional quality and safety aspects. Food Chem 110:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruiz-de-Cenzano M, Beser U, Cervera ML, de la Guardia M (2013) Fast determination of fish mineral profile. Application to Vietnamese panga fish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 95:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.06.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adel M, Conti GO, Dadar M, Mahjoub M, Copat C, Ferrante M (2016) Heavy metal concentrations in edible muscle of whitecheek sharks, Carcharhinus dussumieri (elasmobranchii, chondrichthyes) from the Persian Gulf: a food safety issue. Food Chem Toxicol 97:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Polak-Juszczak L (2007) Bioaccumulation of mercury in the trophic chain of flatfish from the Baltic Sea. Acta Sci Pol Piscaria 6:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. FAO Globefish report – January 2019. Globefish Pangasius Market reports. Information and analysis of the world fish trade. http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/market-reports/resource-detail/en/c/1176222/ Accessed 15 March 2019

  29. Novakov NJ, Mihaljev ZA, Kartalovic BD, Blagojevic BJ, Petrovic JM, Cirkovic MA, Rogan DR (2017) Heavy metals and PAHs in canned fish supplies on the Serbian market. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 10:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2017.1322150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kral T, Blahova J, Sedlackova L, Kalina J, Svobodova Z (2017) Mercury in canned fish from local markets in the Czech Republic. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 10:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2017.1284904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Mughairi S, Yesudhason P, Al-Busaidi M, Al-Waili A, Al-Rahbi WA, Al-Mazrooei N, Al-Habsi SH (2013) Concentration and exposure assessment of mercury in commercial fish and other seafood marketed in Oman. J Food Sci 78(7):T1082–T1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Obeid PJ, El-Khoury B, Burger J, Aouad S, Younis M, Aoun A, El-Nakat JH (2011) Determination and assessment of total mercury levels in local, frozen and canned fish in Lebanon. J Environ Sci (China) 23(9):1564–1569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Burger J, Dixon C, Boring CS, Gochfeld M (2003) Effect of deep-frying fish on risk from mercury. J Toxicol Environ Health A 66(9):817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390306382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kral T, Blahova J, Sedlackova L, Kalina J, Svobodova Z (2017) Mercury in canned fish from local markets in the Czech Republic. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 10(2):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2017.1284904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Srebocan E, Pompe-Gotal J, Prevenar-Crnic A, Ofner E (2007) Mercury concentrations in captive Atlantic Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thunnus) farmed in the Adriatic Sea. Vet Med 52:175–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Andayesh S, Hadiani MR, Mousavi Z, Shoeibi S (2015) Lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury in the canned tuna fish marketed in Tehran, Iran. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 8:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2014.993430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Storelli MM, Giacominelli-Stuffler R, Storelli A, Marcotrigiano GO (2005) Accumulation of mercury, cadmium, lead and arsenic in swordfish and bluefin tuna from the Mediterranean Sea: a comparative study. Mar Pollut Bull 50(9):1004–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Polak-Juszczak L (2012) Bioaccumulation of mercury in the trophic chain of flatfish from the Baltic Sea. Chemosphere 89:585–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Watanabe N, Tayama M, Inouye M, Yasutake A (2012) Distribution and chemical form of mercury in commercial fish tissues. J Toxicol Sci 37:853–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ruelas-Inzunza JR, Horvat M, Pérez-Cortés H, Páez-Osuna F (2003) Methylmercury and total mercury distribution in tissues of gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) and spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) stranded along the lower Gulf of California, Mexico. Cienc Mar 29:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Leaner JJ, Mason RP (2004) Methylmercury uptake and distribution kinetics in sheepshead minnows, Cyprinodon variegatus, after exposure to CH3Hg-spiked food. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2138–2146. https://doi.org/10.1897/03-258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Ljubica Bojanic for her valuable contribution regarding the experimental work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Baralic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djermanovic, M., Baralic, I. & Pejic, S. Total Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish in Market of the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Biol Trace Elem Res 194, 545–551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01805-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01805-4

Keywords

Navigation