Effects of Dietary Different Levels of Nano, Organic and Inorganic Zinc Sources on Performance, Eggshell Quality, Bone Mechanical Parameters and Mineral Contents of the Tibia, Liver, Serum and Excreta in Laying Hens
- 63 Downloads
This study was conducted to determine the effect of dietary zinc (Zn) sources and their levels on the performance, egg quality, tissue mineral concentrations and bone mechanical traits of laying hens. Two hundred seventy, 44-week-old, Super Nick white laying hens were randomly distributed to 15 experimental groups in a 3 (sources of Zn) × 5 (levels of Zn) factorial arrangement, using groups of 18 birds with 6 replicates. The 15 experimental diets consisted of three sources of Zn (zinc-oxide as an inorganic form, zinc-proteinate as an organic form and nano zinc-oxide powder as a nano form) and five different levels of Zn (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mg Zn/kg diet). The experiment lasted 12 weeks. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on the performance parameters between the treatment groups, nor a significant effect on eggshell weight and eggshell breaking strength. Eggshell thickness and eggshell Ca and P contents were significantly affected by the different dietary Zn sources. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on tibia Ca and P contents, and also had no significant effect on tibia Zn content. Liver Zn content was significantly affected by the dietary Zn sources. Serum Zn content was not affected by the dietary treatments. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on tibia weight, tibia stress and tibia breaking strength, as tibia mechanical parameters. Excreta Zn content decreased linearly when hens were fed nano Zn compared to organic and inorganic Zn, and excreta Zn content also linearly increased with increasing dietary Zn levels. In conclusion, 20 mg/kg of supplemental Zn is optimal for sustaining performance, good eggshell quality and bone status, while also reducing Zn excretion and soil pollution, with organic (Zn-proteinate) and nano (ZnO) Zn as the preferred forms in laying hen diets.
KeywordsNano zinc Eggshell Mineral content Bone Laying hens
This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), Project Number 115O938.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. All procedures applied on animals in this study were approved by Ethics Committee of Selçuk University (Number of approvals: 2015-004).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Bain MM (1997) A reinterpretation of eggshell strength. In: Solomon SE (ed) Egg and eggshell quality. London, Manson Publishing, pp 131–142Google Scholar
- 2.Nys Y, Hincke MT, Arias JL, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Solomon SE (1999) Avian eggshell mineralization. Avian Poult Biol Rev 10:143–166Google Scholar
- 8.Sahraei M, Janmmohamdi H, Taghizadeh A, Cheraghi S (2012) Effect of different zinc sources on tibia bone morphology and ash content of broiler chickens. Adv Biol Res 6:128–132Google Scholar
- 10.National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Chapter 2, Nutrient requirements of chickens, Washington, DC, p 23Google Scholar
- 11.Brody T (1997) Nutritional biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 581–591Google Scholar
- 12.Leeson S (2005) Trace mineral requirements of poultry validity of the NRC recommendations. In: Taylorpickard JA, Tucker LA (eds) Re-defining mineral nutrition, Nottingham, pp 107–117Google Scholar
- 13.Mezes M, Erdelyi M, Balogh K (2012) Deposition of organic trace metal complexes as feed additives in farm animals. Eur Chem Bull Sect C 1:410–413Google Scholar
- 15.Pierce JL, Shafer BL, Power R, Dawson KA (2005) Nutritional means to lower trace mineral excretion from poultry without compromising performance. Poult Sci 84:11–16Google Scholar
- 17.Hett A (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter. Many unknowns. Swiss Reinsurance Company, ZurichGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sahoo A, Swain RK, Mishra SK (2014) Effect of inorganic, organic and nano zinc supplemented diets on bioavailability and immunity status of broilers. Int J Adv Res 2:828–837Google Scholar
- 20.Fathi M, Hydari M, Tanha T (2016) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on antioxidant status, serum enzyme activities, biochemical parameters and performance in broiler chicken. J Livestock Sci Technol 4(2):7–13Google Scholar
- 22.ASAE (2001) Standards S459: shear and three point bending test of animal bone. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, p 596Google Scholar
- 25.Skujins S (1998) Handbook for ICP-AES (Varian-vista). A short guide to vista series ICP-AES operation, version 1.0. Varian Int. AG, Zug, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 26.SPSS (2008) SPSS statistics for windows, release 17.0. SPSS, Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 36.Midilli M, Salman M, Muğlali ÖH, Çenesiz S, Ormanci N, Pakdil M, Gürcan IS (2015) The effects of different zinc sources and microbial phytase supplementation on the tibial bone properties, strength and Zn mineralization broilers fed with diet low phosphorus. J Fac Vet Med Kafkas Univ 21:607–614Google Scholar