Advertisement

Effects of Dietary Different Levels of Nano, Organic and Inorganic Zinc Sources on Performance, Eggshell Quality, Bone Mechanical Parameters and Mineral Contents of the Tibia, Liver, Serum and Excreta in Laying Hens

  • Yusuf CufadarEmail author
  • Rabia Göçmen
  • Gülşah Kanbur
  • Bedia Yıldırım
Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of dietary zinc (Zn) sources and their levels on the performance, egg quality, tissue mineral concentrations and bone mechanical traits of laying hens. Two hundred seventy, 44-week-old, Super Nick white laying hens were randomly distributed to 15 experimental groups in a 3 (sources of Zn) × 5 (levels of Zn) factorial arrangement, using groups of 18 birds with 6 replicates. The 15 experimental diets consisted of three sources of Zn (zinc-oxide as an inorganic form, zinc-proteinate as an organic form and nano zinc-oxide powder as a nano form) and five different levels of Zn (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mg Zn/kg diet). The experiment lasted 12 weeks. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on the performance parameters between the treatment groups, nor a significant effect on eggshell weight and eggshell breaking strength. Eggshell thickness and eggshell Ca and P contents were significantly affected by the different dietary Zn sources. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on tibia Ca and P contents, and also had no significant effect on tibia Zn content. Liver Zn content was significantly affected by the dietary Zn sources. Serum Zn content was not affected by the dietary treatments. Dietary Zn sources, Zn levels and their interactions had no significant effect on tibia weight, tibia stress and tibia breaking strength, as tibia mechanical parameters. Excreta Zn content decreased linearly when hens were fed nano Zn compared to organic and inorganic Zn, and excreta Zn content also linearly increased with increasing dietary Zn levels. In conclusion, 20 mg/kg of supplemental Zn is optimal for sustaining performance, good eggshell quality and bone status, while also reducing Zn excretion and soil pollution, with organic (Zn-proteinate) and nano (ZnO) Zn as the preferred forms in laying hen diets.

Keywords

Nano zinc Eggshell Mineral content Bone Laying hens 

Notes

Funding Information

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), Project Number 115O938.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. All procedures applied on animals in this study were approved by Ethics Committee of Selçuk University (Number of approvals: 2015-004).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bain MM (1997) A reinterpretation of eggshell strength. In: Solomon SE (ed) Egg and eggshell quality. London, Manson Publishing, pp 131–142Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nys Y, Hincke MT, Arias JL, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Solomon SE (1999) Avian eggshell mineralization. Avian Poult Biol Rev 10:143–166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zamani A, Rahmani HR, Pourreza J (2005) Effect of different levels of manganese and zinc on performance traits and breaking eggs in laying hens. Pak J Biol Sci 8:1035–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahakaim ASA, Magied HAA, Osman SMH, Omar AS, Abdelmalak NY, Ramadan NA (2014) Effect of using different levels and sources of zinc in layer’s diets on egg zinc enrichment. Egypt Poult Sci 34:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sunder GS, Panda AK, Gopinath NCS, Rao SR, Raju MVLN, Reddy MR, Kumar CV (2008) Effects of higher levels of zinc supplementation on performance, mineral availability, and immune competence in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res 17:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Idowu OMO, Ajuwon RO, Oso AO, Akinloye OA (2011) Effect of zinc supplementation on laying performance, serum chemistry and Zn residue in tibia bone, liver, excreta and egg shell of laying hens. Int J Poult Sci 10:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stofanikova J, Saly J, Molnar L, Sesztakova E, Bilek J (2011) The influence of dietary zinc content on mechanical properties of chicken tibiotarsal bone. Acta Vet (Belgrade) 61:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sahraei M, Janmmohamdi H, Taghizadeh A, Cheraghi S (2012) Effect of different zinc sources on tibia bone morphology and ash content of broiler chickens. Adv Biol Res 6:128–132Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olgun O, Yildiz AO (2017) Effects of dietary supplementation of inorganic, organic or nano zinc forms on performance, eggshell quality, and bone characteristics in laying hens. Ann Anim Sci 17(2):463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Chapter 2, Nutrient requirements of chickens, Washington, DC, p 23Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brody T (1997) Nutritional biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 581–591Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leeson S (2005) Trace mineral requirements of poultry validity of the NRC recommendations. In: Taylorpickard JA, Tucker LA (eds) Re-defining mineral nutrition, Nottingham, pp 107–117Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mezes M, Erdelyi M, Balogh K (2012) Deposition of organic trace metal complexes as feed additives in farm animals. Eur Chem Bull Sect C 1:410–413Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wedekind KJ, Hortin AE, Baker DH (1992) Methodology for assessing zinc bioavailability: efficacy estimated for zinc-methionine, zinc sulphate, and zinc oxide. J Anim Sci 70:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pierce JL, Shafer BL, Power R, Dawson KA (2005) Nutritional means to lower trace mineral excretion from poultry without compromising performance. Poult Sci 84:11–16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang S, Wang L, Liu L, Hou Y, Li L (2015) Nanotechnology in agriculture, livestock, and aquaculture in China: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:369–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hett A (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter. Many unknowns. Swiss Reinsurance Company, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sahoo A, Swain RK, Mishra SK (2014) Effect of inorganic, organic and nano zinc supplemented diets on bioavailability and immunity status of broilers. Int J Adv Res 2:828–837Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao CY, Tan SX, Xiao XY, Qiu ZS, Pan JO, Tang ZX (2014) Effects of dietary zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth performance and antioxidative status in broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res 160:361–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0052-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fathi M, Hydari M, Tanha T (2016) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on antioxidant status, serum enzyme activities, biochemical parameters and performance in broiler chicken. J Livestock Sci Technol 4(2):7–13Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao Y, Li L, Zhang PF, Liu XQ, Zhang WD, Ding ZP, Wang SW, Shen W, Min LJ, Hao ZH (2016) Regulation of egg quality and lipids metabolism by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Poult Sci 95:920–933.  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASAE (2001) Standards S459: shear and three point bending test of animal bone. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, p 596Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson JH, Ruszler PL (1996) Effects of dietary boron supplementation on laying hens. Br Poult Sci 37:723–729.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armstrong TA, Flowers WL, Spears JW, Nielsen FH (2002) Long-term effects of boron supplementation on reproductive characteristics and bone mechanical properties in gilts. J Anim Sci 80:154–161.  https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.801154x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Skujins S (1998) Handbook for ICP-AES (Varian-vista). A short guide to vista series ICP-AES operation, version 1.0. Varian Int. AG, Zug, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    SPSS (2008) SPSS statistics for windows, release 17.0. SPSS, Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tabatabaie MM, Aliarabi H, Saki AA, Ahmadi A, Siyar SA (2007) Effect of different sources and levels of zinc on egg quality and laying hen performance. Pak J Biol Sci 10:3476–3478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsai YH, Mao SY, Li MZ, Huang JT, Lien TF (2016) Effects of nanosize zinc oxide on zinc retention, eggshell quality, immune response and serum parameters of aged laying hens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 213:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohammadi V, Ghazanfari S, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh S, Nazaran MH (2015) Comparative effects of zinc-nano complexes, zinc-sulphate and zinc methionine on performance in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 56:486–493.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1064093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mao SY, Lien TF (2017) Effects of nanosized zinc oxide and γ-polyglutamic acid on eggshell quality and serum parameters of aged laying hens. Arch Anim Nutr 71(5):373–383.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2017.1355600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mabe I, Rapp C, Bain MM, Nys Y (2003) Supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet with manganese, copper, and zinc from organic or inorganic sources improves eggshell quality in aged laying hens. Poult Sci 82:1903–1913.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krebs NF (2000) Overview of zinc absorption and excretion in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Nutr 130:1374–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ao T, Pierce J, Power R, Pescatore AJ, Cantor AH, Dawson KA, Ford MJ (2009) Effect of different forms of zinc and copper on the performance and tissue mineral content of chicks. Poult Sci 88:2171–2175.  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rossi P, Rutz F, Anciuti MA, Rech JL, Zauk NHF (2007) Influence of graded levels of organic zinc on growth performance and carcass traits of broilers. J Appl Poult Res 16:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mohanna C, Nys Y (1999) Effect of dietary zinc content and sources on the growth, body zinc deposition and retention, zinc excretion and immune response in chickens. Br Poult Sci 40:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Midilli M, Salman M, Muğlali ÖH, Çenesiz S, Ormanci N, Pakdil M, Gürcan IS (2015) The effects of different zinc sources and microbial phytase supplementation on the tibial bone properties, strength and Zn mineralization broilers fed with diet low phosphorus. J Fac Vet Med Kafkas Univ 21:607–614Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shelton JL, Southern LL (2007) Interactive effect of zinc, copper and manganese in diets for broilers. Int J Poult Sci 6:466–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swiatkiewicz S, Koreleski J (2008) The effect of zinc and manganese source in the diet for laying hens on eggshell and bones quality. Vet Med 53:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations