Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of Quality Criteria that Allow Differentiation Between Honey Adulterated with Sugar and Pure Honey

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used various parameters of honey to develop a potentially more robust approach to the detection of adulterated honey. For this purpose, 25 multifloral, natural honey samples and 20 samples of adulterated honey produced by bees that had been fed supplementary sucrose syrup were analysed. The mean total phenolic content of the natural honeys was considerably higher than in the adulterated honeys at 157 ± 13 and 35.2 ± 7.3 mg GAE/100 g, respectively. Similarly, considerable variation was determined between natural and adulterated honeys in terms of total flavonoids (3.3 ± 0.3 and 2.1 ± 0.4 mg QE/100 g, respectively), antiradical activity (87.9 ± 12 and 163 ± 11 mg/mL, respectively) and proline content (202 ± 26 and 71.1 ± 21.6 mg/kg, respectively.) The potassium, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium contents of natural honeys were also higher than in adulterated honeys (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the determination of the proline level, phenolic content, antioxidant activity and mineral profile may collectively provide a more holistic method approach to the differentiation of natural and adulterated honey, and also for comparing their food values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001) Codex standard 12, Revised Codex Standard for Honey, Standards and Standard Methods 11

  2. Coulston AM (2000) Honey how sweet it is! Nutr Today 35(3):96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholls J, Miraglio AM (2003) Honey and healthy diets. Cereal Food World 48(3):116–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nisbet C, Guler A, Ciftci G, Yarim GF (2009) The investigation of protein profile of different botanic origin honey and density saccharose-adulterated honey by SDS-PAGE method. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 15(3):443–446

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Mamary M, Al-Meeri A, Al-Habori M (2002) Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutr Res 22(9):1041–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tosun M (2013) Detection of adulteration in honey samples added various sugar syrups with 13C/12C isotope ratio analysis method. Food Chem 138(2–3):1629–1632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nisbet HO, Nisbet C, Yarim M, Guler A, Ozak A (2010) Effects of three types of honey on cutaneous wound healing. Wounds 22(11):275–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guler A, Kocaokutgen H, Garipoglu AV, Onder H, Ekinci D, Biyik S (2014) Detection of adulterated honey produced by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies fed with different levels of commercial industrial sugar (C3 and C4 plants) syrups by the carbon isotope ratio analysis. Food Chem 155:155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Du B, Wu L, Xue X, Chen L, Li Y, Zhao J, Cao W (2015) Rapid screening of multiclass syrup adulterants in honey by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 63(29):6614–6623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouazen AM, Al-Walaan N (2014) Glucose adulteration in Saudi honey with visible and near infrared spectroscopy. Int J Food Prop 17:2263–2274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guler A, Garıpoglu A, Onder H, Bıyık S, Kocaokutgen H, Ekıncı D (2017) Comparing biochemical properties of pure and adulterated honeys produced by feeding honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) colonies with different levels of industrial commercial sugars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 23(2):259–268

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raezke KP, Elflein L (2007) LC-IRMS: A newly developed analytical method to determine adulterations with sugar and additions of sugars. Apimondia Congress, 9–14 September, Melbourne, Australia

  13. Kropf U, Golob T, Nečemer M, Kump P, Korošec M, Bertoncelj J, Ogrinc N (2010) Carbon and nitrogen natural stable isotopes in Slovene honey: adulteration and botanical and geographical aspects. J Agric Food Chem 58(24):12794–12803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimins F, Kuka P, Augspole I (2010) Characterisation of honey antioxidative properties. Food Innoua, International conference on Food Innovation 1–4

  15. Meda A, Lamien CE, Romito M, Millogo J, Nacoulma OG (2005) Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chem 91(3):571–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Velázquez E, Tournier HA, Mordujovich de Buschiazzo P, Saavedra G, Schinella GR (2003) Antioxidant activity of Paraguayan plant extracts. Fitoterapia 74(1–2):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Azeredo LC, Azeredo MAA, Souza SR, Dutra VML (2003) Protein contents and physicochemical properties in honey samples of Apis mellifera of different floral origins. Food Chem 80(2):249–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Estupinan S, Sanjuan E (1998) Quality parameters of honey II chemical composition. Alimentaria 297:117–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. www.ogm.gov.tr (2017) Bal ormanları eylem planı.101–27

  21. Mbiri A, Onditi A, Oyaro N, Murago E (2011) Determination of essential and heavy metals in Kenyan honey by atomic absorption and emission spectroscopy. J Agric Sci Technol 13(1):107–115

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2017) Nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edition. John Wiley& Sons. Inc., ISNB: 978-0-470-038737-5, 848-9

  23. Ranneh Y, Ali F, Zarei M, Akim AM, Hamid HA, Khazaai H (2018) Malaysian stingless bee and Tualang honeys: a comparative characterization of total antioxidant capacity and phenolic profile using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. LWT—Food Sci Technol 89:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Khalil MI, Sulaiman SA, Boukraa L (2010) Antioxidant properties of honey and its role in preventing health disorder. Open Nut J 3:6–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lianda RLP, Sant’Ana LD, Echevarria A, Castro RN (2012) Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of Brazilian honeys and their extracts. J Braz Chem Soc 23(4):618–627

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Das A, Mukherjee A, Dhar P (2013) Characterization of antioxidants and antioxidative properties of various unifloral honeys procured from West Bengal, India. IOSR-JESTFT 7(3):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cimpoiu C, Hosu A, Miclaus V, Puscas A (2013) Determination of the floral origin of some Romanian honeys on the basis of physical and biochemical properties. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 100:149–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Won SR, Li CY, Kim JW, Rhee HI (2009) Immunological characterization of honey major protein and its application. Food Chem 113(4):1334–1338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sak-Bosnar M, Sakač N (2012) Direct potentiometric determination of diastase activity in honey. Food Chem 135(2):827–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Escuredo O, Míguez M, Fernández-González M, Carmen Seijo M (2013) Nutritional value and antioxidant activity of honeys produced in a European Atlantic area. Food Chem 138(2–3):851–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Da Silva PM, Gauche C, Gonzaga LV, Costa AC, Fett R (2016) Honey: chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem 196:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krell, R. (1996). Value added products from beekeeping. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin. No. 124.Rome

  33. Alvarez-Suarez JM, Tulipani S, Romandini S, Bertoli E, Battino M (2010) Contribution of honey in nutrition and human health: a review. Mediterr J Nutr Metab 3:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cotte JF, Casabianca H, Giroud B, Albert M, Lheritier J, Grenier-Loustalot MF (2004) Characterization of honey amino acid profiles using high-pressure liquid chromatography to control authenticity. Anal Bioanal Chem 378(5):1342–1350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Madejczyk M, Baralkiewicz D (2008) Characterization of Polish rape and honeydew honey according to their mineral contents using ICP-MS and F-AAS/AES. Anal Chim Acta 617(1–2):11–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Terrab A, Recamales AF, Gonzalez-Miret ML, Heredia FJ (2005) Contribution to the study of avocado honeys by their mineral contents using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Food Chem 92(2):305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Alqarni AS, Owayss AA, Mahmoud AA, Hannan MA (2012) Mineral content and physical properties of local and imported honeys in Saudi Arabia. J of Saudi Chem Soc 5:618–625

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ajtony Z, Bencs L, Haraszi R, Szigeti J, Szoboszlai N (2007) Study on the simultaneous determination of some essential and toxic trace elements in honey by multi-element graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 71(2):683–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Serhat Arslan for editing the content of this manuscript related to the statistical analysis and Gregory T. Sullivan (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia) for editing the English in an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55220, Samsun, Turkey

    Cevat Nisbet

  2. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, 31060, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey

    Filiz Kazak

  3. Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55220, Samsun, Turkey

    Yuksel Ardalı

Authors
  1. Cevat Nisbet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Filiz Kazak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuksel Ardalı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cevat Nisbet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nisbet, C., Kazak, F. & Ardalı, Y. Determination of Quality Criteria that Allow Differentiation Between Honey Adulterated with Sugar and Pure Honey. Biol Trace Elem Res 186, 288–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1305-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1305-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation