Advertisement

Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 156, Issue 1–3, pp 316–322 | Cite as

Cr(VI) Imposed Toxicity in Maize Seedlings Assessed in Terms of Disruption in Carbohydrate Metabolism

  • Priyanka Mahajan
  • Harminder Pal Singh
  • Daizy R. Batish
  • Ravinder K. Kohli
Article

Abstract

The present study examined the toxic effects of Cr(VI; 100, 250 and 500 μM) in maize seedlings by investigating the changes in carbohydrate metabolism after 48, 96, and 144 h of exposure. Cr-stress results in severe alterations in the contents of carbohydrates and reducing sugars and the activities of carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes, amylases, phosphatases and phosphorylases, and invertases in maize seedlings. Under Cr stress, the contents of carbohydrates and reducing sugars declined in roots, whereas an increase was noticed in leaves. The catalytic activity of carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes, except invertases, in roots declined in the presence of Cr(VI) in a concentration- and exposure time-dependent manner. In contrast, the activities of these enzymes were enhanced in leaves under Cr(VI) stress. The activity of invertases increased with increasing amount of Cr(VI) but declined with an increase in the time interval. In conclusion, our results show that carbohydrate metabolism is severely affected under Cr(VI) toxicity. The study suggests that Cr-induced perturbations in the carbohydrate metabolism are one of the factors resulting in growth inhibition under Cr(VI) stress.

Keywords

α- and β-amylases Acid and alkaline phosphatase Starch phosphorylase Invertase Reducing sugars 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Priyanka Mahajan is thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (New Delhi, India) for financial support in the form of research fellowship.

References

  1. 1.
    Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh HP, Mahajan P, Kaur S, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2013) Chromium toxicity and tolerance in plants. Environ Chem Lett 11:229–254Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliveira H (2012) Chromium as an environmental pollutant: insights on induced plant toxicity. J Bot 2012:8. doi: 10.1155/2012/375843
  4. 4.
    Mangabeira PA, Ferreira AS, de Almeida AA, Fernandes VF, Lucena E, Souza VL, Dos Santos AJ Jr, Oliveira AH, Grenier-Loustalot MF, Barbier F, Silva DC (2011) Compartmentalization and ultrastructural alterations induced by chromium in aquatic macrophytes. Biometals 24:1017–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nichols PB, Couch JD, Al-Hamdani SH (2000) Selected physiological responses of Salvinia minima to different chromium concentrations. Aquat Bot 68:313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prado C, Rodríguez-Montelongo L, González JA, Pagano EA, Hilal M, Prado FE (2010) Uptake of chromium by Salvinia minima: Effect on plant growth, leaf respiration and carbohydrate metabolism. J Hazard Mater 177:546–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodriguez E, Santos C, Azevedo R, Moutinho-Pereira J, Correia C, Dias MC (2012) Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. Plant Physiol Biochem 53:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prado C, Rosa M, Pagano E, Hilal M, Prado FE (2010) Seasonal variability of physiological and biochemical aspects of chromium accumulation in outdoor-grown Salvinia minima. Chemosphere 81:584–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rai V, Mehrotra S (2008) Chromium-induced changes in ultramorphology and secondary metabolites of Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn.—an hepatoprotective plant. Environ Monit Assess 147:307–315Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loewus FA (1952) Improvement in anthrone method for determination of carbohydrates. Anal Chem 24:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153:375–380Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NT, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin–phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muentz K (1977) The function of the pod for protein storage in seeds of Vicia faba L. 5. Isoenzymes of α-amylase during pod development of field beans. Phytochemistry 16:1491–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernfeld P (1951) Amylase, α and β-. Meth Enzymol 1:149–158Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dure LS (1960) Site of origin and extent of activity of amylases in maize germination. Plant Physiol 35:925–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malik CP, Singh MB (1980) Plant enzymology and histo-enzymology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiske CH, Subbarow Y (1952) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 56:375Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu D, Zou J, Wang M, Jiang W (2008) Hexavalent chromium uptake and its effects on mineral uptake, antioxidant defence system and photosynthesis in Amaranthus viridis L. Bioresour Technol 99:2628–2636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pandey V, Dixit V, Shyam R (2005) Antioxidative responses in relation to growth of mustard (Brassica juncea cv. Pusa Jaikisan) plants exposed to hexavalent chromium. Chemosphere 61:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shanker AK, Pathmanabhan G (2004) Speciation dependant antioxidative response in roots and leaves of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. cv. CO 27) under Cr(III) and Cr(VI) stress. Plant Soil 265:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagajyoti PC, Dinakar N, Suresh S, Udaykiran Y, Suresh C, Prasad TNVKV, Damodharam T (2009) Biomass industrial effluent effect on carbohydrates, amino acids, nitrite and nitrite enzyme activities of Arachis hypogaea L. Agric Sci China 8:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaur S, Singh HP, Batish DR, Negi A, Mahajan P, Rana S, Kohli RK (2012) Arsenic (As) Inhibits radicle emergence and elongation in Phaseolus aureus by altering starch-metabolizing enzymes vis-à-vis disruption of oxidative metabolism. Biol Trace Elem Res 146:360–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosa M, Prado C, Podazza G, Interdonato R, Gonzalez JA, Hilal M, Prado FE (2009) Soluble sugars-metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: a complex network in the life of plants. Plant Signal Behav 4:388–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh HP, Kaur G, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2011) Lead (Pb)-inhibited radicle emergence in Brassica campestris involves alterations in starch-metabolizing enzymes. Biol Trace Elem Res 144:1295–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dua A, Sawhney SK (1991) Effect of chromium on activities of hydrolytic enzymes in germinating pea seeds. Environ Exp Bot 31:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith AM, Zeeman SC, Thorneycroft D, Smith SM (2003) Starch mobilization in leaves. J Exp Bot 54(382):577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu SM, Lee YC, Fang SC, Chan MT, Hwa SF, Liu LF (1996) Sugars act as signal molecules and osmotica to regulate the expression of α-amylase genes and metabolic activities in germinating cereals grains. Plant Mol Biol 30:1277–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schupp N, Ziegler P (2004) The relation of starch phosphorylases to starch metabolism in wheat. Plant Cell Physiol 45:1471–1484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ranwala AP, Miller WB (1998) Sucrose cleaving enzymes and carbohydrate pools in Lilium longiflorum floral organs. Physiol Plant 103:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blum U, Schwedt G (1998) Inhibition behavior of acid phosphatase, phosphodiesterase I and adenosine deaminase as tools for trace metal analysis and speciation. Anal Chim Acta 360:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mishra S, Dubey RS (2008) Changes in phosphate content and phosphatase activities in rice seedlings exposed to arsenite. Braz J Plant Physiol 20:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dube BK, Sinha P, Gopal R, Chatterjee C (2004) Chromium phytotoxicity alters metabolism in radish. J Veg Crop Prod 10:61–71Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agoreyo BO (2010) Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase activities in ripening fruit of Musa paradisiaca L. Plant Omics J 3:66–69Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Panara F, Pasqualini S, Antonielli M (1990) Multiple forms of barley root acid phosphatase: purification and some characteristics of the major cytoplasmic isoenzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1037:73–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priyanka Mahajan
    • 2
  • Harminder Pal Singh
    • 1
  • Daizy R. Batish
    • 2
  • Ravinder K. Kohli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environment StudiesPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations