Skip to main content

Using the Pollen Viability and Morphology for Fluoride Pollution Biomonitoring

Abstract

The methods using plants for biomonitoring of air and soil quality are simple, cheap, and fast and can supplement the classical physicochemical methods. In this study, biological pollen characterization of some collected legume species from an aluminum smelter area in Iran (IRALCO) was carried out to determine the actual value of pollen as a bioindicator of the effects of soil and atmospheric pollution. Young buds and flowers of six legumes (Cercis siliquastrum L., Medicago sativa L., Robinia pseudoacacia L., Melilotus officinalis (L.) lam, Trifolium repens L., and Sophora alopecuroides L.) in polluted and control plants were removed and compared. Studies of light and electron microscopic preparation showed some abnormalities during pollen development in affect of fluoride pollution. The viability of pollen grains estimated by staining with acetocarmine shows sharp differences in smearing advanced pollen grains from abnormal ones. Except M. officinalis, the pollen grains of C. siliquastrum, M. sativa, R. pseudoacacia, T. repens, and S. alopecuroides in polluted areas showed light, partial, or no staining with acetocarmine, whereas almost all of the control ones clearly stained. Observation of the pollen grains by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed the significant effect of fluoride on shapes and sizes of pollen grains. The stimulation and inhibition of these pollen characteristics depend on the pollen species as well as on the pollutant and its concentration. Therefore, pollen grains provide essential information on biological impact of pollutants and they are good candidates for biomonitoring the atmospheric and edaphic pollutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Arndt U, Flores F, Weinstein L (1995) Fluoride effects on plants. Diagnosis of injury in the vegetation of Brazil. Editora UFRGS, Porto Alerge, p. 155

  2. 2.

    Asghari J (2000) Estimation of pollen viability of metsulfuron treated dyers woad (Isatis tinctoria) for herbicide efficacy evaluation. J Agr Sci Tech 2:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bellani LM, Paoletti E, Cenni E (1988) Air pollution effects on pollen germination of forest species. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 265–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Comtois P, Schemenauer RS (1991) Tree pollen viability in areas subject to high pollutant deposition. Aerobiologia 7:144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fornasiero RB (2001) Phytotoxic effects of fluorides. Plant Sci 161:979–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gottardini E, Cristofolini F, Paoletti E, Lazzeri P, Pepponi G (2004) Pollen viability for air pollution bio-monitoring. J Atmos Chem 49:149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Iannotti O, Mincigrucci G, Bricchi E, Frenguelli G (2000) Pollen viability as a bio-indicator of air quality. Aerobiologia 16:361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    IRMO (Iran Meterological Organization). (2000). Meterological Year Book. Ministry of Road and Transportation.

  9. 9.

    Majd A, Chehregani A, Moin M, Gholami M, Kohno S, Nabe T, Shariatzade MA (2004) The effects of air pollution on structures, proteins and allergenicity of pollen grains. Aerobiologia 20(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Malayeri BE, Chehregani A, Yousefi N, Lorestani B (2007) Identification of the hyper accumulator plants in copper and iron mine in Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 11(3):490–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Noori M, Malayeri BE, Jafari M (2009) Determination of fluoride and its effects on flavonoids in some legumes. Toxicol Environ Chem 91(3):409–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Treshow M, Pack MR (1970) Fluoride. In: Jacobson,J.S. and Hill, A.C., Editors, 1970. Recognition of air pollution injury to vegetation.

  13. 13.

    Weinstein LH (1977) Fluoride and plantlife. J Occup Med 19:49–78

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Weinstein LH, Davison AW (2003) Native plant species suitable as bioindicators and biomonitors for airborne fluoride. Environ Pollut 125:3–11

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wolters JHB, Martens MJM (1987) Effects of air pollutants on pollen. Bot Rev 53:372–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yousefi N, Chehregani A, Malayeri BE, Lorestani B, Cheraghi M (2011) Investigating the effect of heavy metals on developmental stages of anther and pollen in Chenopodium botrys L. (Chenopodiaceae). Biol Trace Elem Res 140:368–376

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behrooz Eshghi Malayeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malayeri, B.E., Noori, M. & Jafari, M. Using the Pollen Viability and Morphology for Fluoride Pollution Biomonitoring. Biol Trace Elem Res 147, 315–319 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9290-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biomonitoring, Air pollution
  • Soil pollution
  • Pollen viability
  • Fluoride