Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Different Selemethionine Forms and Levels on Performance of Breeder Hens and Se Distribution of Tissue and Egg Inclusion

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments in randomized design was conducted to investigate the effect of different selenomethionine (SM) sources and levels on the productive performance of breeder hens and the Se distribution in the inclusion of eggs and serum and tissues of breeder hens and its offspring. A total of 480 Ling-Nan-Huang breeder hens, 48 weeks of age, were allocated to four treatments, each of which included three replicates of 40 hens. Pretreatment period was 2 weeks, and the experiment lasted 8 weeks. Two SM forms of dl-SM and l-SM were supplemented at 0.15 or 0.30 mg Se/kg into the basal diet. Results showed that the Se level of 0.15 mg/kg supplemented in the diet, compared to 0.30 mg/kg, significantly elevated the percentage of egg production (p < 0.05), hatchability (p < 0.01), and birthrate (p < 0.01), whereas the Se level of 0.30 mg/kg led to a higher Se content in egg contents, serum, and all tissues (p < 0.01). In addition, the form of dl-SM showed a significant increase in Se content of egg inclusion (p < 0.01), serum (p < 0.01), and all tissues (p < 0.01, except breeder hens’ pancreas and its offspring’s liver and breast muscle). The birthrate and yolk Se content were markedly influenced by the interaction between Se source and Se level (p < 0.01). The above results suggested that dl-SM, compared to l-SM, had a similar equal effect on the performance of breeder hens, but dl-SM was superior to l-SM with respect to selenium distribution in egg inclusion, serum, and tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwarz K, Foltzs CM (1957) Selenium as an integral part of factor 3 against dietary necrotic liver degeneration. J Am Chem Soc 79:3292–3293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Swanson CA, Patterson BH, Levander OA, Veillon C, Taylor PR, Helzlsouer K, Zech LA, McAdam PA (1991) Human [74Se] selenomethionine metabolism: a kinetic model. Am J Clin Nutr 54:917–926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vendeland SC (1994) Uptake of selenite, selenomethionine and selenate by brushborder membrane vesicles isolated from rat small intestine. Biometals 7:305–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang CL, Lovell RT (1997) Organic selenium sources, selenomethionine and selenoyeast, have higher bioavailability than an inorganic selenium source, sodium selenite, in diets for channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquaculture 152:223–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beilstein MA, Whanger PD (1986) Deposition of dietary organic and inorganic selenium in rat erythrocyte proteins. J Nutr 116:1701–1710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly MP, Power RF (1995) Fractionalization and identification of the major selenium containing compounds in selenized yeast. J Dairy Sci 78(Suppl 1):237

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olson OE, Novacek EJ, Whitehead EI, Palmer IS (1970) Investigations on selenium in wheat. Phytochemistry 9:1181–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yasumoto K, Iwami K, Yoshida M (1984) Nutritional efficiency and chemical form of selenium, an essential trace element, contained in soybean protein. Daizu Tanpakushitsu Eiyo Kenyukai Kaishi 4:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ullrey DE, Combs GF, Conrad HR, Hoekstra WG, Jenkins KJW, Levander OA, Whanger PD (1983) Selenium in nutrition. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, pp 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander AR, Whanger PD, Miller LT (1988) Bioavailability to rats of selenium in various tuna and wheat products. J Nutr 113:196–204

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomson CD, Stewart RDH (1973) Metabolic studies of (Se-75)-selenomethionine and (Se-75)-selenite in the rat. Br J Nutr 30:139–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Surai PF (2006) Selenium distribution and reserves in human body. In: Surai PF (ed) Selenium in nutrition and health. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 161–171

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhan Z, Wang M, Zhao R-Q, Li WF (2007) Effects of different selenium source on selenium distribution, loin quality and antioxidant status in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 132:202–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomson CD, Stewart RDH (1974) The metabolism of (Se-75)-selenite in young women. Br J Nutr 32:47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths NM, Stewart RDH, Robinson MF (1976) The metabolism of (75Se)-selenomethionine in four women. Br J Nutr 35:373–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson MF, Rea HM, Frjend GM, Stewart RDH, Snow PCS, Thomson CD (1978) On supplementing the selenium intake of New Zealanders. 2. Prolonged metabolic experiments with daily supplements of selenomethionine, selenite, and fish. Br J Nutr 39:589–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schrauzer GN (2003) The nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicology of selenomethionine. Adv Food Nutr Res 47:73–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cukierski MJ, Willhite CC, Lasley BL, Hendrie TA, Book SA, Cox DN, Hendrickx AG (1989) 30-day oral toxicity study of l-selenomethionine in female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Toxicol Sci 13:26–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rose WC (1938) The nutritive significance of the amino acids. Physiol Rev 18:109–136

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rose WC, Womack MY (1946) The utilization of the optical isomers of phenylalanine, and the phenylalanine requirement for growth. J Biol Chem 166:103–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maier KJ, Foe CG, Knight AW (1993) Comparative toxicity of selenate, selenite, seleno-DL-methionine, and seleno-dl-cysteine to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:755–763

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavlović Z, Miletić I, Jokić Ž, Šobajić S (2009) The effect of dietary selenium source and level on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Biol Trace Elem Res 131:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Payne RL, Lavergne TK, Southern LL (2005) Effect of inorganic versus organic selenium on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Poult Sci 84:232–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cantor AH, Straw ML, Ford MJ, Pescatore AJ, Dunlap MK (2000) Effect of feeding organic selenium in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. In: Sim JS, Nakai S, Guenter W (eds) Egg nutrition and biotechnology. CABI Publishing, New York, p 473

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patton ND (2000) Organic selenium in the nutrition of laying hens: effects on egg selenium content, egg quality and transfer to developing chick embryos. PhD dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

  26. Whanger PD, Butler JA (1988) Effects of various dietary levels of selenium as selenite or selenomethionine on tissue selenium levels and glutathione peroxidase activity in rats. J Nutr 118:846–852

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boehm MF, Bada JL (1985) The racemization rate of selenomethionine and methionine in yeast at 100 degrees and neutral pH. Animal Biochemistry 145:273–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Combs GF, Combs SB (1986) The role of selenium in nutrition. Academic, Orlando, pp 2, 413–454

  29. Mahan DC, Parrett NA (1996) Evaluating the efficacy of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite on tissue selenium retention and serum glutathione peroxidase activity in grower and finisher swine. J Anim Sci 74:2967–2974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahan DC, Clone TR, Richert B (1999) Effects of dietary levels of Se-enriched yeast and sodium selenite as Se source fed to growing-finishing pigs on performance, tissue glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics and loin quality. J Anim Sci 77:2172–2179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim YY, Mahan DC (2001) Comparative effects of high dietary levels of organic and inorganic selenium on selenium toxicity of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 79:942–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahan DC (2000) Effects of organic and inorganic selenium sources and levels on sow colostrums and milk selenium content. J Anim Sci 78:100–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahan DC, Peters JC (2004) Long-term effects of dietary organic and inorganic selenium sources and levels on reproducing sows and their progeny. J Anim Sci 82:1343–1358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gary EE, Allaway WH, Miller M (1973) Utilization of different forms of dietary selenium. J Anim Sci 36:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  35. Deacen JT, Butler JA, Beilstein MA, Whanger PD (1987) Effects of dietary selenite, selenocystein and selenomethionine on selenocysteine lyase and glutathione peroxidase activities and on selenium levels in rat tissues. J Nutr 117:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  36. Humaloja T, Mykkanen HM (1986) Intestinal absorption of (Se-75)-labeled sodium selenite and selenomethionine in chicks: effects of time, segment, selenium concentration and method of measurement. J Nutr 116:142–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Whanger P, Vendeland S, Park YC, Xia Y (1996) Metabolism of subtoxic levels of selenium in animals and humans. Ann Clin Lab Sci 26(2):99–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim YY, Mahan DC (2003) Biological aspects of selenium in farm animals. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 16:435–444

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schrauzer GN (2000) Selenomethionine: a review of its nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicity. J Nutr 130:1653–1656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McAdam PA, Levander OA (1986) Metabolism of selenium in rats chronically poisoned with d- or l-selenomethionine, selenite or selenate. Fed Proc 45:476, abs. 1874

    Google Scholar 

  41. McAdam PA, Levander OA (1987) Chronic toxicity of dietary selenium fed to rats as d- or l-selenomethionine, selenite or selenate. Nutr Res (New York) 7:601–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Juniper DT, Phipps RH, Ramos-Morales E, Bertin G (2009) Effects of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 149:228–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cantor AH, Scott ML (1974) The effect of selenium in the hen’s diet on egg production, hatchability, performance of progeny and selenium concentration in eggs. Poult Sci 53:1870–1880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ort JF, Latshaw JD (1978) The toxic level of sodium selenite in the diet of laying chickens. J Nutr 108:1114–1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Swanson CA (1987) Comparative utilization of selenite, selenomethionine, and selenized yeast by the laying hen. Nutr Res (New York, NY) 7:529–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Davis RH, Fear J, Winton AC (1996) Interactions between dietary selenium, copper, and sodium nitroprusside (a source of cyanide) in growing chicks and laying hens. Br Poult Sci 37:87–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sunde RA, Hoekstra WG (1980) Incorporation of selenium from selenite and selenocystine into glutathione peroxides in the isolated perfused rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 93:1181–1188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Forstrom JW, Zakowski JJ, Tappel AL (1978) Identification of the catalytic site of rat liver glutathione peroxidase as selenocysteine. Biochenistry 17:2639–2644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Paton ND, Cantor AH, Pescatore AJ, Ford MJ (2000) Effect of dietary selenium source and shortage on internal quality and shell strength of eggs. Poult Sci 79(suppl1):116

    Google Scholar 

  50. Golubkina NA, Papazyan TT (2006) Selenium distribution in eggs of avain species. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 145:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ochoa-Solano A, Gitler C (1968) Incorporation of 75Se-selenomethionine and 35S-methionine into chicken egg white proteins. J Nutr 94:243–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Latshaw JD, Biggert MD (1981) Incorporation of selenium into egg proteins after feeding selenomethionine or sodium selenite. Poult Sci 60:1309–1313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, LeCaptain LJ (1995) Toxicity of seleno-l-methionine, seleno-dl-methionine, high selenium wheat, and selenized yeast to mallard ducklings. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 30(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support provided by Program for Century Excellent Talents in University (project NECT-07-0758) and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (project NYCYTX-42-G2-06) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuan Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, R., Zhan, X., Wang, Y. et al. Effect of Different Selemethionine Forms and Levels on Performance of Breeder Hens and Se Distribution of Tissue and Egg Inclusion. Biol Trace Elem Res 143, 923–931 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8886-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8886-8

Keywords

Navigation