Abstract
Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is an important biopolymer with many applications due to its biodegradable and non-toxic characteristics. γ-PGA is produced industrially by fermentation of Bacillus species. The optimal pH range for producing γ-PGA by Bacillus subtilis PG-001 was firstly studied by glucose fed-batch fermentation with non-controlled pH. Result showed that both cell growth and γ-PGA synthesis were repressed when pH was lower than pH 6. Further investigation with γ-PGA fed-batch fermentation showed that pH 6.5 is more suitable for γ-PGA fermentation than pH 7. Under comparable consumption of glutamic acid and glucose, 11.8 g/L γ-PGA and 0.7 g/g yield were achieved by fermentation at pH 6.5, which was significantly higher than 10.5 g/L and 0.56 g/g yield of fermentation at pH 7. In addition, γ-PGA degradation during later phase of fermentation was repressed at pH 6.5 as 9238cP of final broth viscosity was achieved from fermentation at pH 6.5 while it was only 346 cP for fermentation at pH 7. Finally, a glucose feedback control pH-stat strategy was performed for reducing alkali consumption during γ-PGA fermentation, which further increased final γ-PGA concentration to 15.5 g/L with much higher viscosity (11458 cP); meanwhile the consumption of alkali decreased 57%. The fed-batch γ-PGA fermentation with glucose feedback control pH-stat strategy showed high feasibility for industrial scaling-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Not applicable
References
Wang, J., Yuan, H.-L., Wei, X.-T., Chen, J.-G., & Chen, S.-W. (2016). Enhancement of poly-γ-glutamic acid production by alkaline pH stress treatment in Bacillus licheniformis WX-02. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 91, 2399–2403.
Kunioka, M. (1997). Biosynthesis and chemical reactions of poly(amino acid)s from microorganisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 47, 469–475.
Shih, I.-L., & Van, Y.-T. (2001). The production of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) from microorganisms and its various applications. Bioresource Technology, 79, 207–225.
Li, L.-F., Liu, Y., Jiang, L., Ding, S., Chen, G.-G., Liang, Z.-Q., & Zeng, W. (2021). Effects of cell physiological structure on the fermentation broth viscosity during poly-γ-glutamic acid production by Bacillus subtilis GXA-28. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 193, 271–280.
Pan, L., Chen, X.-S., Wang, K.-F., & Mao, Z.-G. (2020). Mechanisms of response to pH shock in microbial fermentation. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 43, 361–372.
Wang, L.-L., Chen, J.-T., Wang, L.-F., Wu, S., Zhang, G.-Z., Yu, H.-Q., Ye, X.-D., & Shi, Q.-S. (2017). Conformations and molecular interactions of poly-γ-glutamic acid as a soluble microbial product in aqueous solutions. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12787.
Wang D-X., Hwang J-S., Kim D-H, Lee S., Joe M-H (2020) A newly isolated Bacillus siamensis SB1001 for mass production of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Process Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.11.034
Shih, I.-L., Van, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-N. (2002). Application of statistical experimental methods to optimize production of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) by Bacillus licheniformis CCRC 12826. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 31, 213–220a.
Cromwick, A.-M., Gregory, A. B., & Gross, R. A. (1996). Effects of pH and aeration on γ-poly(glutamic acid) formation By Bacillus licheniformis in controlled batch fermentor cultures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 50(2), 222–227.
Lena, M., Kauffmann, K., Wengeler, T., Mitsunaga, H., Fukusaki, E., & Büchs, J. (2015). Influence of nitrogen source and pH value on undesired poly(γ-glutamic acid) formation of a protease producing Bacillus licheniformis strain. The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 42, 1203–1215.
Wu, Q., Xu, H., Ying, H.-J., & Ouyang, P.-K. (2010). Kinetic analysis and pH-shift control strategy for poly(γ-glutamic acid) production with Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 0833. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 50, 24–28.
Richard, A., & Margaritis, A. (2003). Rheology, oxygen transfer, and molecular weight characteristics of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) fermentation by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering., 82(3), 299–305.
Yao, J., Xu, H., Shi, N.-N., Cao, X., Feng, X.-H., Li, S., & Ouyang, P.-K. (2010). Analysis of carbon metabolism and improvement of γ-polyglutamic acid production from Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 160, 2332–2341.
Flores, C., Medina-Valdez, Abraham, Peña, Carlos, Serrano-Carreón, Leobardo, & Galindo, Enrique. (2020). Oxygen transfer rate determines molecular weight and production of poly(γ-glutamic acid) as well as carbon utilization by Bacillus velezensis 83. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 95, 2383–2392.
Nadia, A. S., Mahmoud, M Berekaa, & Abdel-Fattah, R Abdel-Fattah. (2005). Polyglutamic acid (PGA) production by Bacillus sp. SAB-26: Application of Plackett-Burman experimental design to evaluate culture requirements. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 69, 259–267.
Richard, A., & Margaritis, A. (2003). Optimization of cell growth and poly(glutamic acid) production in batch fermentation by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology Letters, 25, 465–468.
Veenhoff, Liesbeth M., Heuberger, Esther H.M.L.., & Poolman, Bert. (2002). Quaternary structure and function of transport proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 27(5), 242–249.
Kunioka, M. (1995). Biosynthesis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from L-glutamine, citric acid and ammonium sulfate in Bacillus subtilis IFO3335. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 44, 501–506.
Kunioka, M., & Goto, A. (1994). Biosynthesis of poly(γ-glutamic acid) from L-glutamic acid, citric acid, and ammonium sulfate in Bacillus subtilis IFO3335. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 40, 867–872.
Yao, J., Jing, J., Xu, H., Liang, J.-F., Wu, Q., Feng, X.-H., & Ouyang, P.-K. (2009). Investigation on enzymatic degradation of γ-polyglutamic acid from Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 56(2009), 158–164.
Ashiuchi, M., Kamei, T., Baek, D.-H., Shin, S.-Y., Sung, M.-H., Soda, K., Yagi, T., & Misono, H. (2001). Isolation of Bacillus subtilis (chungkookjang), a poly-γ-glutamate producer with high genetic competence. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 57, 764–769.
King, E. C., Blacker, A. J., & Bugg, D. H. (2000). Enzymatic breakdown of poly-γ-D-glutamic acid in Bacillus licheniformis: Identification of a polyglutamyl γ-hydrolase enzyme. Biomacromolecules, 1(1), 75–83.
Sibel, O., Pinar, C., & Tunçer, H. (2016). Fed-batch biomolecule production by Bacillus subtilis: A state of the art review. Trends in Biotechnology, 34(4), 329–345.
Chen, S.-Y., Wei, Y.-H., & Chang, J.-S. (2007). Repeated pH-stat fed-batch fermentation for rhamnolipid production with indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa S2. The Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 76, 67–74.
Sung, H. Y., Jin, H. D., Sang, Y. L., & Ho, N. C. (2000). Production of poly- γ-glutamic acid by fed-batch culture of Bacillus Licheniformis. Biotechnology Letters, 22, 585–588.
Zhu, F., Cai, J., Wu, X.-T., Huang, J., Huang, L., Zhu, J.-Z., Zheng, Q., Cen, P.-L., & Xu, Z.-N. (2013). The main byproducts and metabolic flux profiling of γ-PGA-producing strain B. subtilis ZJU-7 under different pH values. Journal of Biotechnology, 164(2013), 67–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jiaqi Wang: Experiment design, execution, and paper writing
Jie Zhao: Support experiment design and data analysis
Jian-Ye Xia: Corresponding author and guide the research direction
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable
Consent to Participate
Not applicable
Consent for Publication
Not applicable
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, JQ., Zhao, J. & Xia, JY. γ-PGA Fermentation by Bacillus subtilis PG-001 with Glucose Feedback Control pH-stat Strategy. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 194, 1871–1880 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03755-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03755-x