Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Enzymatic Deinking of Non-impact Ink Laser-Printed Paper Using Crude Enzyme from Penicillium rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of microbial enzymes for paper deinking is getting tremendous attention due to the rapidly increasing of waste paper every year. This study reports the deinking efficiency of laser-printed paper by the lignocellulolytic enzyme from Penicillium rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL strain compared to other enzyme sources as well as commercial available enzymes. High enzymatic deinking efficiency of approximately 82 % on laser-printed paper was obtained by pulp treatment with crude enzyme from P. rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL. However, this crude enzyme was found to reduce the paper strength properties of the pulp based on the results of tensile, tear and burst indices, most probably due to the cellulose degradation. This was further proven by the low viscosity of paper pulp obtained after enzymatic treatment and increasing of sugar production during the treatment. Balancing to this detrimental effect on paper pulp, high deinking efficiency was achieved within a short period of time, in which the enzymatic treatment was conducted for 30 min that enabled contribution to higher brightness index obtained, thus promoting savings of time and energy consumption, therefore environmental sustainability. Extensive research should be conducted to understand the nature and mechanism of enzymatic deinking process by the crude enzyme from P. rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL in order to improve paper strength properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bajpai, P. (1999). Application of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry. Biotechnology Progress, 15, 147–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bajpai, P., & Bajpai, P. K. (1998). Deinking with enzymes: a review. Tappi Journal, 81, 111–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borchardt, J. K., Miller, J. D., & Azevedo, M. A. D. (1998). Office paper de-inking. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 3, 360–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, B., Tschirner, U., & Ramaswamy, S. (1998). Impact of pulp chemical composition on recycling. Tappi Journal, 81, 119–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chander Kuhad, R., Mehta, G., Gupta, R., & Sharma, K. K. (2010). Fed batch enzymatic saccharification of newspaper cellulosics improves the sugar content in the hydrolysates and eventually the ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, 1189–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das, A., Paul, T., Halder, S. K., Jana, A., Maity, C., Das Mohapatra, P. K., Pati, B. R., & Mondal, K. C. (2013). Production of cellulolytic enzymes by Aspergillus fumigatus ABK9 in wheat bran-rice straw mixed substrate and use of cocktail enzymes for deinking of waste office paper pulp. Bioresource Technology, 128, 290–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Feria, M. J., García, J. C., Díaz, M. J., Garrote, G., & López, F. (2012). Optimization the soda-AQ process for cellulose pulp production and energy content of black liquor from L. leucocephala K360. Bioresource Technology, 120, 173–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Genco, J. M., Busayasakul, N., Medhora, H. K., & Robbins, W. (1990). Hemicellulose retention during Kraft pulping. Tappi Journal, 73, 223–233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghose, T. K. (1987). Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59, 257–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal, A., Ghosh, B., & Eveleigh, D. (1991). Characteristics of fungal cellulases. Bioresource Technology, 36, 37–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gubitz, G. M., Mansfield, S. D., & Saddler, J. N. (1998). Effectiveness of two endoglucanases from Gloeophyllum sp. in deinking mixed office waste paper. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry (pp. C135–C138).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim, R. (2003). Structural, mechanical and optical properties of recycled paper blended with empty oil palm fruit bunch pulp. Journal Oil Palm Research, 15, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kanda, T., Wakabayashi, K., & Nisizawa, K. (1980). Purification and properties of a lower-molecular-weight endo-cellulase from Irpex lacteus (Polyporus tulipiferae). Journal of Biochemistry, 87, 1625–1634.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, C. K., Darah, I., & Ibrahim, C. O. (2007). Enzymatic deinking of laser printed office waste papers: some governing parameters on deinking efficiency. Bioresource Technology, 98, 1684–1689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, C. K., Ibrahim, D., & Che Omar, I. (2013). Enzymatic deinking of various types of waste paper: efficiency and characteristics. Process Biochemistry, 48, 299–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, C. K., Ibrahim, D., Ibrahim, C. O., & Rosli, W. D. W. (2011). Enzymatic and chemical deinking of mixed office wastepaper and old newspaper: paper quality and effluent characteristics. BioResources, 6, 3859–3875.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, K. C., Arai, T., Ibrahim, D., Deng, L., Murata, Y., Mori, Y., & Kosugi, A. (2016). Characterization of oil-palm trunk residue degradation enzymes derived from the isolated fungus, Penicillium rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL. Environmental Technology, 37, 1550–1558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Linder, M., & Teeri, T. T. (1997). The roles and function of cellulose-binding domains. Journal of Biotechnology, 57, 15–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, J., & Hu, H. (2012). The role of cellulose binding domains in the adsorption of cellulases onto fibers and its effect on the enzymatic beating of bleached Kraft pulp. BioResources, 7, 878–892.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marques, S., Pala, H., Alves, L., Amaral-Collaço, M. T., Gama, F. M., & Gírio, F. M. (2003). Characterisation and application of glycanases secreted by Aspergillus terreus CCMI 498 and Trichoderma viride CCMI 84 for enzymatic deinking of mixed office wastepaper. Journal of Biotechnology, 100, 209–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazumder, B., Ohtani, Y., Cheng, Z., & Sameshima, K. (2000). Combination treatment of kenaf bast fiber for high viscosity pulp. Journal of Wood Science, 46, 364–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohandass, C., & Raghukumar, C. (2005). Biological deinking of inkjet-printed paper using Vibrio alginolyticus and its enzymes. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 32, 424–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pala, H., Lemos, M. A., Mota, M., & Gama, F. M. (2001). Enzymatic upgrade of old paperboard containers. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 29, 274–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pala, H., Mota, M., & Gama, F. M. (2004). Enzymatic versus chemical deinking of non-impact ink printed paper. Journal of Biotechnology, 108, 79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pala, H., Mota, M., & Gama, F. M. (2006). Factors influencing MOW deinking: laboratory scale studies. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38, 81–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pang, P. K. (2010) Production of cellulase and xylanase by indigenous Aspergillus niger AI-1 via solid substrate fermentation and its application in deinking of mixed office waste paper. Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia, Ph.D. thesis (pp. 261–318)

  28. Pathak, P., Bhardwaj, N. K., & Singh, A. K. (2011). Optimization of chemical and enzymatic deinking of photocopier waste paper. BioResources, 6, 447–463.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pèlach, M. A., Pastor, F. J., Puig, J., Vilaseca, F., & Mutjé, P. (2003). Enzymic deinking of old newspapers with cellulase. Process Biochemistry, 38, 1063–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qian, Y., & Goodell, B. (2005). Deinking of laser printed copy paper with a mediated free radical system. Bioresource Technology, 96, 913–920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qin, M., Gao, P., Shao, Z., Fu, Y., & Wang, Q. (2000). Enzymatic deinking of old newsprint. China Pulp & Paper, 19, 7–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Quick, T. H., & Hodgson, K. T. (1986). Xerography deinking—a fundamental approach. Tappi Journal, 69, 102–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadana, J. C., Lachke, A. H., & Patil, R. V. (1984). Endo-(1 → 4)-β-d-glucanases from Sclerotium rolfsii. Purification, substrate specificity, and mode of action. Carbohydrate Research, 133, 297–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Soni, R., Nazir, A., & Chadha, B. S. (2010). Optimization of cellulase production by a versatile Aspergillus fumigatus fresenius strain (AMA) capable of efficient deinking and enzymatic hydrolysis of Solka floc and bagasse. Industrial Crops and Products, 31, 277–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Soni, R., Nazir, A., Chadha, B. S., & Saini, H. S. (2008). Novel sources of fungal cellulases for efficient deinking of composite paper waste. BioResources, 3, 234–246.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Terrasan, C. R. F., Temer, B., Duarte, M. C. T., & Carmona, E. C. (2010). Production of xylanolytic enzymes by Penicillium janczewskii. Bioresource Technology, 101, 4139–4143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. van Wyk, J. P. H. (2001). Sequential bioconversion of used paper to sugars by cellulases from Trichoderma reesei and Penicillium funiculosum. Environmentalist, 21, 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Verma, N., Bansal, M. C., & Kumar, V. (2011). Enzymatic deinking with cellulases: a review. Journal Solid Waste Technology Management, 37, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Viesturs, U., Leite, M., Eisimonte, M., Eremeeva, T., & Treimanis, A. (1999). Biological deinking technology for the recycling of office waste papers. Bioresource Technology, 67, 255–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Virk, A. P., Puri, M., Gupta, V., Capalash, N., & Sharma, P. (2013). Combined enzymatic and physical deinking methodology for efficient eco-friendly recycling of old newsprint. PloS One, 8, e72346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Vyas, S., & Lachke, A. (2003). Biodeinking of mixed office waste paper by alkaline active cellulases from alkalotolerant Fusarium sp. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 32, 236–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, X., Renaud, S., & Paice, M. (2008). Cellulase deinking of fresh and aged recycled newsprint/magazines (ONP/OMG). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 43, 103–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhenying, S., Shijin, D., Xuejun, C., Yan, G., Junfeng, L., Hongyan, W., & Zhang, S. X. (2009). Combined de-inking technology applied on laser printed paper. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48, 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education in Malaysia for financial support. The research grant scheme USM-PRGS also supported this project. The author is also grateful for the useful advices and guidance from Dr. Leh Cheu Peng, Miss Tye Ying Ying, and Miss Chong Yin Hui as well as facilities provided by School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok Chang Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K.C., Tong, W.Y., Ibrahim, D. et al. Evaluation of Enzymatic Deinking of Non-impact Ink Laser-Printed Paper Using Crude Enzyme from Penicillium rolfsii c3-2(1) IBRL. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 181, 451–463 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2223-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2223-4

Keywords

Navigation