Skip to main content
Log in

In Silico Comparison of Low- and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Proteins

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important pathogen which is classified into two, high- and low-risk groups. The proteins of high-risk and low-risk HPV types have different functions. Therefore, there is a need to develop a computational method for predicting these two groups. In the present study, the physiochemical properties of all early (E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7) and late (L1 and L2) proteins in high- and low-risk HPV types have been studied. The concept of receiver operating characteristic analysis and support vector machines methods has been used for comparison of high- and low-risk HPV types. The results demonstrate that amino acid composition, physiochemical, and secondary structure of E2 protein are significantly different between these two groups. The results demonstrate that in silico properties can create useful information to predict high-risk and low-risk HPV types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longworth, M. S., & Laimins, L. A. (2004). Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Persson, G., Andersson, K., & Krantz, I. (1996). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 75, 287–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Villiers, E. M., Fauquet, C., Broker, T. R., Bernard, H. U., & zur Hausen, H. (2004). Virology, 324, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steben, M., & Duarte-Franco, E. (2007). Gynecologic Oncolgy, 107, S2–S5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Syrjänen, S. M., & Syrjänen, J. K. (1999). Annals of Internal Medicine, 31, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Munger, K., & Howley, P. M. (2002). Virus Research, 89, 213–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leechanachai, P., Banks, L., Moreau, F., & Matlashewski, G. (1992). Oncogene, 7, 19–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scheffner, M., Werness, B. A., Huibregtse, J. M., Levine, A. J., & Howley, P. M. (1990). Cell, 63, 1129–1136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huibregtse, J. M., Scheffner, M., & Howley, P. M. (1993). Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13, 775–784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson, N., Howley, P. M., Munger, K., & Harlow, E. (1989). Science, 243, 934–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Münger, K., Phelps, W. C., Bubb, V., Howley, P. M., & Schlegel, R. (1989). Journal of Virology, 63, 4417–4421.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gage, J. R., Meyers, C., & Wettstein, F. O. (1990). Journal of Virology, 64, 723–730.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawana, Y., Kawana, K., Yoshikawa, H., Taketani, Y., Yoshiike, K., & Kanda, T. (2001). Journal of Virology, 75, 2331–2336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, R., Day, P. M., Yutzy, W. H., Lin, K. Y., Hung, C. F., & Roden, R. B. (2003). Journal of Virology, 77, 3531–3541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Janicek, M. F., & Averette, H. E. (2001). Cervical cancer: prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinician, 51, 92–114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosch, F. X., Manos, M. M., Muñoz, N., Sherman, M., Jansen, A. M., Peto, J., Schiffman, M. H., Moreno, V., Kurman, R., & Shah, K. V. (1995). The Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87, 796–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., Castellsague, X., Shah, K. V., Snijders, P. J., & Meijer, C. J. (2003). New England Medical Journal, 348, 518–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park, S. B., Hwang, S., and Zhang, B. T. (2003), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 403–412.

  19. Joung, J. G., June, O. S., & Zhang, B. T. (2006). Computers in Biology and Medicine, 36, 656–667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, S., Kim, J., & Zhang, B. T. (2009). Computers in Biology and Medicine, 39, 187–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esmaeili, M., Mohabatkar, H., & Mohsenzadeh, S. (2010). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 263, 203–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, W., & Godzik, A. (2006). Bioinformatics, 22, 1658–1659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, M., Thakur, V., & Raghava, G. P. (2008). In Silico Biology, 8, 121–128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gasteiger, E., Hoogland, C., Gattiker, A., Duvaud, S., Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D, and Bairoch, A. (2005), The Proteomics Protocols Handbook 571–607

  25. Kloczkowski, A., Ting, K. L., Jernigan, R. L., & Garnier, J. (2002). Polymer, 43, 441–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fawcett, T. (2006). Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vergara, I. A., Norambuena, T., Ferrada, E., Slater, A. W., & Melo, F. (2008). BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Noble, W. S. (2006). Nature Biotechnology, 24, 1565–1567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982). Journal of Molecular Biology, 157, 105–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fehrmann, F., & Laimins, L. A. (2003). Oncogene, 22, 5201–5207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, D., Lee, B., Kim, J., Kim, D. W., & Choe, J. (2000). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275, 7045–7051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, S. C., Goto, N. K., Williams, K. A., & Deber, C. M. (1996). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 6676–6681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The support of this research by University of Isfahan is highly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Mohabatkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alemi, M., Mohabatkar, H. & Behbahani, M. In Silico Comparison of Low- and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Proteins. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172, 188–195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0479-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0479-5

Keywords

Navigation