Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Target Efficiencies for Solid–Liquid Separation Steps in Biofuels Production

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development of liquid biofuels has entered a new phase of large scale pilot demonstration. A number of plants that are in operation or under construction face the task of addressing the engineering challenges of creating a viable plant design, scaling up and optimizing various unit operations. It is well-known that separation technologies account for 50–70% of both capital and operating cost. Additionally, reduction of environmental impact creates technological challenges that increase project cost without adding to the bottom line. Different technologies vary in terms of selection of unit operations; however, solid–liquid separations are likely to be a major contributor to the overall project cost. Despite the differences in pretreatment approaches, similar challenges arise for solid–liquid separation unit operations. A typical process for ethanol production from biomass includes several solid–liquid separation steps, depending on which particular stream is targeted for downstream processing. The nature of biomass-derived materials makes it either difficult or uneconomical to accomplish complete separation in a single step. Therefore, setting realistic efficiency targets for solid–liquid separations is an important task that influences overall process recovery and economics. Experimental data will be presented showing typical characteristics for pretreated cane bagasse at various stages of processing into cellulosic ethanol. Results of generic material balance calculations will be presented to illustrate the influence of separation target efficiencies on overall process recoveries and characteristics of waste streams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laser, M., Schulman, D., Allen, S. G., Lichwa, J., Antal, M. J., & Lynd, L. R. (2002). Bioresource Technology, 81, 33–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schultz, T. P., Blermann, C. J., & McGinnis, G. D. (1983). Ind Eng Chem Prod RD, 22, 344–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Playne, M. J. (1984). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 26, 426–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holtzapple, M., Lundeen, J., Sturgis, R., Lewis, J., & Dale, B. (1992). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 34–35, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chundawat, S. P. S., Venkatesh, B., & Dale, B. E. (2007). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 96, 219–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sendich, E., Laser, M., Kim, S., Alizadeh, H., Laureano-Perez, L., Dale, B., et al. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99, 8429–8435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, V. S., Burr, B., & Holtzapple, M. (2007). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 63–65, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Torget, R., Himmel, M., Wright, J., & Grohmann, K. (1988). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 17, 89–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., et al. (2002), Lignoscellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover., National Renewable Energy Labaratory, Golden, CO, NREL/TP-510-32438.

  10. Cuzens, J. C., & Miller, J. R. (1997). Renewable Energy, 10, 285–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kochergin, V., Kearney, M., Herbst, R. S., Mann, N. R., Garn, T. G., & Hess, J. R. (2004). Challenges for membrane filtration of biomass derived solutions. Houston: AIChE Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Monavari, S., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2009). Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Queiroz, G. A., & Stradi, B. (2007). Dilute Ammonia Process for the Treatment of Lignocellulosic Materials, PCT/033173/US2009

  14. Kochergin, V., Olmstead, S., & Jacob, W. (2001). Zuckerindustrie, 126, 376–379.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., & Templeton, D. (2005). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass: NREL laboratory analytical procedure. Golden: NREL.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saska, M., & Gray, M. (2006). Pre-treatment of sugarcane leaves and bagasse pith with lime-impregnation and steam explosion for enzymatic conversion to fermentable sugars. 28th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Nashville, TN

  17. Prior, B. A., & Day, D. F. (2008). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 146, 151–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Queiroz, G. A., Stradi, B., Vazan, V., & Ramachandran, T. (2009). Ethanol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse by an Ammonia Process. Bioresource Technology. In Review.

  19. Glasser, W. G., & Wright, R. S. (1998). Biomass and Bioenergy, 14, 219–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by DOE award (DE-FG36-08GO88151). This support does not constitute an endorsement by DOE of the views expressed in this article.

We would like to thank our colleagues from Audubon Sugar Institute, Dr. Don Day and Dr. Giovanna DeQueiroz, for their useful technical discussions and Iryna Tishechkina for helping in the experimental work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kochergin, V., Miller, K. Evaluation of Target Efficiencies for Solid–Liquid Separation Steps in Biofuels Production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163, 90–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9019-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9019-8

Keywords

Navigation