Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 162, Issue 7, pp 1872–1880 | Cite as

Ball Milling Pretreatment of Corn Stover for Enhancing the Efficiency of Enzymatic Hydrolysis

  • Zengxiang Lin
  • He Huang
  • Hongman Zhang
  • Lin Zhang
  • Lishi Yan
  • Jingwen Chen
Article

Abstract

Ethanol can be produced from lignocellulosic biomass with the usage of ball milling pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. The sugar yields from lignocellulosic feed stocks are critical parameters for ethanol production process. The research results from this paper indicated that the yields of glucose and xylose were improved by adding any of the following dilute chemical reagents: H2SO4, HCl, HNO3, CH3COOH, HCOOH, H3PO4, and NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)2, NH3·H2O in the ball milling pretreatment of corn stover. The optimal enzymatic hydrolysis efficiencies were obtained under the conditions of ball milling in the alkali medium that was due to delignification. The data also demonstrated that ball milling pretreatment was a robust process. From the microscope image of ball milling-pretreated corn stover, it could be observed that the particle size of material was decreased and the fiber structure was more loosely organized. Meanwhile, the results indicate that the treatment effect of wet milling is better than that of dry milling. The optimum parameters for the milling process were ball speed of 350 r/min, solid/liquid ratio of 1:10, raw material particle size with 0.5 mm, and number of balls of 20 (steel ball, Φ = 10 mm), grinding for 30 min. In comparison with water milling process, alkaline milling treatment could increase the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of corn stover by 110%; and through the digestion process with the combination of xylanase and cellulase mixture, the hydrolysis efficiency could increase by 160%.

Keywords

Lignocellulosics Ball milling Pretreatment Enzymatic hydrolysis Corn stover 

References

  1. 1.
    Ho, N. W. Y. (2004). Astonishing mutant gene enabling the conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol fuel and green chemicals by the safe effective saccharomyces yeast. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 227, U299–U299.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldemberg, J. (2007). Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science, 315(5813), 808–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Himmel, M. E. (2007). Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science, 315(5813), 804–807.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y. Y., Holtzapple, M., et al. (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 96(6), 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hendriks, A. T. W. M., & Zeeman, G. (2009). Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 100(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akin, D. E., Morrison, W. H., Rigsby, L. L., Barton, F. E., Himmelsbach, D. S., & Hicks, K. B. (2006). Corn stover fractions and bioenergy. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 129(1–3), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Y. H. P., Ding, S. Y., Mielenz, J. R., Cui, J. B., Elander, R. T., Laser, M., et al. (2007). Fractionating recalcitrant lignocellulose at modest reaction conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 97(2), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carvalheiro, F., Duarte, L. C., & Girio, F. M. (2008). Hemicellulose biorefineries: a review on biomass pretreatments. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 67(11), 849–864.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bridgeman, T. G., Darvell, L. I., Jones, J. M., Williams, P. T., Fahmi, R., Bridgwater, A. V., et al. (2007). Influence of particle size on the analytical and chemical properties of two energy crops. Fuel, 86(1–2), 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaques, B. J., Marx, B. M., Hamdy, A. S., & Butt, D. P. (2008). Synthesis of uranium nitride by a mechanically induced gas–solid reaction. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 381(3), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maier, G., Zipper, P., Stubicar, M., & Schurz, J. (2005). Amorphization of different cellulose samples by ball milling. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 39(3–4), 167–177.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwan, C. C., Ghadiri, M., Papadopoulos, D. G., & Bentham, A. C. (2003). The effects of operating conditions on the milling of microcrystalline cellulose. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 26(2), 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hideno, A., Inoue, H., Tsukahara, K., Fujimoto, S., Minowa, T., Inoue, S., et al. (2009). Wet disk milling pretreatment without sulfuric acid for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw. Bioresource Technology, 100(10), 2706–2711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoshida, M., Liu, Y., Uchida, S., Kawarada, K., Ukagami, Y., Ichinose, H., et al. (2008). Effects of cellulose crystallinity, hemicellulose, and lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis to monosaccharides. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 72(3), 805–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rai, C. L., Mueller, J., Struenkmann, G., & Rao, P. G. (2008). Microbial growth reduction in sewage sludge by stirred ball mill disintegration and estimation by respirometry. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 83(3), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teramoto, Y., Tanaka, N., Lee, S. H., & Endo, T. (2008). Pretreatment of eucalyptus wood chips for enzymatic saccharification using combined sulfuric acid-free ethanol cooking and ball milling. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 99(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tabka, M. G., Herpoel-Gimbert, I., Monod, F., Asther, M., & Sigoillot, J. C. (2006). Enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw for bioethanol production by a combined cellulase xylanase and feruloyl esterase treatment. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 39(4), 897–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, Z. X., Huang, H., Zhang, H. M., Yan, L. S., Chen, J. W., Jin, Q., et al. (2009). Optimization of process parameters of ball milling pretreatment of corn stalk. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 25(3), 202–204.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prasad, B. M., Sain, M. M., & Roy, D. N. (2005). Properties of ball milled thermally treated hemp fibers in an inert atmosphere for potential composite reinforcement. Journal of Materials Science, 40(16), 4271–4278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parveen, K., Diane, M. B., Michael, J. D., & Pieter, S. (2009). Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(8), 3713–3729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zengxiang Lin
    • 1
  • He Huang
    • 1
  • Hongman Zhang
    • 2
  • Lin Zhang
    • 3
  • Lishi Yan
    • 1
  • Jingwen Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Pharmacy and Life ScienceNanjing University of TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of ScienceNanjing University of TechnologyNanjingChina
  3. 3.College of Materials Science and Chemical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations