Abstract
Results in a previous study showed up to a 55% increase in saccharification rates when the initial particle size range decreased from 590 < x < 850 μm down to 33 < x < 75 μm. The smaller particle sizes also lowered the viscosity of the slurry 50-fold (for an equivalent initial solids concentration). In this study, ultrasonic irradiation was employed to further reduce the particle size of sawdust slurries below the ranges in the previous study in an attempt to further increase enzymatic saccharification rates and lower the slurry viscosity. Average particle sizes were reduced to less than 1 μm under the conditions tested. Surprisingly, the amount and rates of sugar released in this study with the ~1 μm particles is comparable (maximum glucose release of 30%) to, but no better than that seen for particle sizes in the range of 33 ≤ x ≤ 75 μm (maximum glucose release of 31%). Also surprisingly, the viscosity increased as the average particle sizes in the slurries decreased, which is opposite to the trend in the previous study. For example, there was an approximately threefold increase in the viscosity between unsonicated samples with a range of 10 ≤ x ≤ 75 μm and sonicated samples with a range of 0.05 ≤ x ≤ 12 μm. This is attributed to the variations in surface characteristics of the particles which were characterized here using X-ray diffraction profiles and SEM pictures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dasari, R. K., & Berson, R. E. (2007). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 136–140, 289–299. doi:10.1007/s12010-007-9059-x.
Price, G. (1990). Advances in Sonochemistry. In: Mason, T. J., (ed.) London: JAI, (vol. 1, pp. 231–287).
Petrie, A., Jeunet, A., Luche, J., & Reverdy, G. (1992). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 114, 3148.
Watson, N. E., Prior, B. A., Lategan, P. M., & Lussi, M. (1984). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 6, 451–456.
Shoh, A. (1988). Industrial applications of ultrasound. In K. S. Suslick (Ed.), Ultrasound: Its Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects. New York: VCH. chapter 3.
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., More, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., & Struhl, K. (1996). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Green Publishing and Wiley Interscience.
Wang, D., Sakakibara, M., Kaoyuki, N., & Suzuki, K. (1996). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 65, 86–92. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199601)65:1<86::AID-JCTB394>3.0.CO;2-L.
Sun, X., Sun, R., Sun, X. F., & Su, Y. (2004). Carbohydrate Research, 339, 291–300. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2003.10.027.
Li, C., Yoshimoto, M., Ogata, H., Tsukuda, N., Fukunaga, K., & Nakao, K. (2005). Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 12, 373–384. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.02.004.
Rolz, C. (1986). Biotechnology Letters, 8, 131–136. doi:10.1007/BF01048471.
Pietsch, W. (2007). Chemical Engineering Progress. An AIChE Publicattions, 115, 18–21.
Millett, M. A., Baker, A. J., & Scatter, L. D. (1976). Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium, 6, 125–153.
Fan, L. T., Lee, Y., & Gharpuray, M. M. (1982). Advances in Biochem. Engineer, 23, 157–187.
Converse, A. O., Ooshima, H., & Burns, D. S. (1990). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 24/25, 67–73. doi:10.1007/BF02920234.
Wolcott, M. P., Kamke, F. A., & Dillard, D. A. (1990). Wood and Fiber Science, 22, 345–361.
Gumuskaya, E., & Usta, M. (2002). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26, 247–252.
Nara, S., & Komiya, T. (1983). Starch-Starke, 35, 407. doi:10.1002/star.19830351202.
Pimenova, N. V., & Hanley, T. R. (2003). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 114, 347–360. doi:10.1385/ABAB:114:1-3:347.
Majumder, S. K., Chandna, K., Sankar De, S., & Kundu, G. (2006). International Journal of Mineral Processing, 79, 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2006.02.004.
Nguyen, Q. A., Tucker, M., Keller, F., & Eddy, F. (1992). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84-86, 561–576. doi:10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:561.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Kentucky Governor’s Office of Energy Policy (PO2-855-07000074491) for their financial support; Genencor International, Inc. for supplying the enzyme used in this study; Garrard wood products of Lancaster, KY for supplying sawdust; and the Institute of Advanced Materials and Renewable Energy (IAM-RE) at the University of Louisville, KY for their help with obtaining the X-ray profiles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rezania, S., Ye, Z. & Berson, R.E. Enzymatic Saccharification and Viscosity of Sawdust Slurries Following Ultrasonic Particle Size Reduction. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 153, 103–115 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8467-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8467-x