Advertisement

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 151, Issue 2–3, pp 307–318 | Cite as

Production of Biopesticides in an In Situ Cell Retention Bioreactor

  • Gunjan Prakash
  • Ashok K. Srivastava
Article

Abstract

The seeds of Azadirachta indica contain azadirachtin and other limonoids, which can be used as a biopesticide for crop protection. Significant variability and availability of seed only in arid zones has triggered biotechnological production of biopesticides to cope up with its huge requirement. Batch cultivation of A. indica suspension culture was carried out in statistically optimized media (25.0 g/l glucose, 5.7 g/l nitrate, 0.094 g/l phosphate and 5 g/l inoculum) in 3 l stirred tank bioreactor. This resulted in 15.5 g/l biomass and 0.05 g/l azadirachtin production in 10 days leading to productivity of 5 mg l−1 day−1. Possible inhibition by the limiting substrates (C, N, P) were also studied and maximum inhibitory concentrations identified. The batch kinetic/inhibitory data were then used to develop and identify an unstructured mathematical model. The batch model was extrapolated to simulate continuous cultivation with and without cell retention in the bioreactor. Several offline computer simulations were done to identify right nutrient feeding strategies (with respect to key limiting substrates; carbon, nitrate and phosphate) to maintain non-limiting and non-inhibitory substrate concentrations in bioreactor. One such continuous culture (with cell retention) simulation was experimentally implemented. In this cultivation, the cells were propagated batch-wise for 8 days. It was then converted to continuous cultivation by feeding MS salts with glucose (75 g/l), nitrate (10 g/l), and phosphate (0.5 g/l) at a feed rate of 500 ml/day and withdrawing the spent medium at the same rate. The above continuous cultivation (with cell retention) demonstrated an improvement in cell growth to 95.8 g/l and intracellular accumulation of 0.38 g/l azadirachtin in 40 days leading to an overall productivity of 9.5 mg l−1 day−1.

Keywords

Bio-pesticide Azadirachtin Continuous cultivation Mathematical modeling Cell retention 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) provided by Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India to one of the authors (Ms. Gunjan Prakash) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacbson, M. (1988). In: M. Jacbson (Ed.), CRC Boca Raton Fla. 1, pp. 101–140.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmutterer, H. (1990). Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mordue (Luntz), A. J., & Blackwell, A. (1993). Journal of Insect Physiology, 39, 903–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isman, M.B. (2004). In: O. Koul, S. Wahab (Eds.), Kluwer Academic publishers, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yakkundi, S. R., Thejavathi, R., & Ravindranath, B. (1995). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43, 2517–2519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sidhu, O. P., & Behl, H. M. (1996). Current Science, 70, 1084–1085.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prakash, G., Bhojwani, S. S., & Srivastava, A. K. (2002). Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 7, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laplace, J. M., Delgenes, J. P., Moletta, R., & Navarro, J. M. (1993). Process Biochemistry, 28, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prakash, G., & Srivastava, A. K. (2005). Process Biochemistry, 40, 3795–3800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chattopadhyay, S., Srivastava, A. K., Bhojwani, S. S., & Bisaria, V. S. (2002). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 93, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, G. M. (1959). Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cataldo, D. A., Haroon, M., Schrader, L. E., & Youngs, V. L. (1975). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962). Analytica Chemica Acta, 27, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raval, K., Hellwig, S., Prakash, G., Plasencia, A. R., Srivastava, A. K., & Buchs, J. J. (2003). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96, 16–22.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bard, Y. (1974). In non-linear parameter estimation pp. 219–233. New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volesky, B., & Vortuba, J. (1992). In modeling and optimization of fermentation process pp. 38–54. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Votruba, J. (1982). Acta Biotechnologica, 2, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). The Computer Journal, 3, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chattopadhyay, S., Bisaria, V. S., & Srivastava, A. K. (2003). Biotechnology Progress, 19, 1026–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wheat, D., Bodaryk, R. P., & Nystrom, J. (1986). Journal of Horticultural Science, 21, 819.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, S. Y., Kim, Y. H., Roh, Y. S., Myong, H. J., Lee, K. Y., & Kim, D-II. (2004). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 35, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Cell Culture Laboratory, Department of Biochemical Engineering and BiotechnologyIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations