Abstract
Improving the quality of cellulosic ethanol feedstocks through breeding and genetic manipulation could significantly impact the economics of this industry. Attaining this will require comprehensive and rapid characterization of large numbers of samples. There are many similarities between improving corn silage quality for dairy production and improving feedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol. It was our objective to provide insight into what is needed for genetic improvement of cellulosic feedstocks by reviewing the development and operation of a corn silage breeding program. We discuss the evolving definition of silage quality and relate what we have learned about silage quality to what is needed for measuring and improving feedstock quality. In addition, repeatability estimates of corn stover traits are reported for a set of hybrids. Repeatability of theoretical ethanol potential measured by near-infrared spectroscopy is high, suggesting that this trait may be easily improved through breeding. Just as cell wall digestibility has been factored into the latest measurements of silage quality, conversion efficiency should be standardized and included in indices of feedstock quality to maximize overall, economical energy availability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Service, R. F. (2007). Science, 315, 1488–1491.
Wyman, C. E. (2007). Trends in Biotechnology, 25, 153–157.
Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Coors, J. G., & Lauer, J. G. (2001). In A. R. Hallauer (Ed.) Specialty corns pp. 347–392. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Ragauskas, A. J., Williams, C. K., Davison, B. H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J., Eckert, C. A., et al. (2006). Science, 311, 484–489.
Allen, M. S., Coors, J. G., & Roth, G. W. (2003). In D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, & J. H. Harrison (Eds.) Silage science and technology pp. 547–608. Madison, WI: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.
Lauer, J. G., Coors, J. G., & Flannery, P. J. (2001). Crop Science, 41, 1449–1455.
Undersander, D. J., Howard, W. T., & Shaver, R. D. (1993). Journal of Production Agriculture, 6, 231–235.
Weiss, W. P. (1994). In G. C. Fahey (Ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization pp. 644–681. Madison, WI: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.
Mertens, D. R. (1987). Journal of Animal Science, 64, 1548–1558.
Oba, M., & Allen, M. S. (1999). Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 589–596.
Schwab, E. C., Shaver, R. D., Lauer, J. G., & Coors, J. G. (2003). Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology, 109, 1–18.
Shaver, R. D. (2006). Corn silage evaluation: MILK2000 challenges and opportunities with MILK2006. Available at: http://www.wisc.edu/dysci/uwex/nutritn/pubs/milk2006weblinktext.pdf.
Lauer, J., Kohn, K., & Flannery, P. J. (2005). Wisconsin corn hybrid performance trials grain and silage. University of Wisconsin Ext. Publ. A3653. Available at: http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/HT/2005/Text.htm.
Coors, J. G. (2007). UW corn silage breeding program. Available: http://www.silagebreeding.agronomy.wisc.edu/Corn/corn_home.htm.
Jung, H. G., Mertens, D. R., & Buxton, D. R. (1998). Crop Science, 38, 205–210.
Hames, B. R., Thomas, S. R., Sluiter, A. D., Roth, C. J., & Templeton, D. W. (2003). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 105, 5–16.
Lessells, C. M., & Boag, P. T. (1987). Auk, 104, 116–121.
Duvick, D. N., Smith, J. S. C., & Cooper, M. (2004). Plant Breeding Reviews, 24, 109–151.
Justen, B. (2004). M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenz, A.J., Coors, J.G. What can be Learned from Silage Breeding Programs?. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 148, 261–270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8116-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8116-9