Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Furfural, Vanillin and Syringaldehyde on Candida guilliermondii Growth and Xylitol Biosynthesis

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Xylitol is a five-carbon sugar alcohol with established commercial use as an alternative sweetener and can be produced from hemicellulose hydrolysate. However, there are difficulties with microbiological growth and xylitol biosynthesis on hydrolysate because of the inhibitors formed from hydrolysis of hemicellulose. This research focused on the effect of furfural, vanillin, and syringaldehyde on growth of Candida guilliermondii and xylitol accumulation from xylose in a semi-synthetic medium in microwell plate and bioreactor cultivations. All three compounds reduced specific growth rate, increased lag time, and reduced xylitol production rate. In general, increasing concentration of inhibitor increased the severity of inhibition, except in the case of 0.5 g vanillin per liter, which resulted in a faster late batch phase growth rate and increased biomass yield. At concentrations of 1 g/l or higher, furfural was the least inhibitory to growth, followed by syringaldehyde. Vanillin most severely reduced specific growth rate. All three inhibitors reduced xylitol production rate approximately to the same degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morita, T. A., & Silva, S. S. (2000). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84–86, 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saha, B. C. (2003). Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 30(5), 279–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Preziozi-Belloy, L., Nolleau, V., & Navarro, J. M. (2000). Biotechnology Letters, 22, 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winkelhausen, E., & Kuzmanova, S. (1998). Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 86(1), 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez, E. A., Silva, S. S., & Felipe, M. G. A. (2000). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84–86, 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Felipe, M. G. A. (2004). In B. C. Saha, & K. Hayashi (Eds.) Lignocellulose biodegradation pp. 300–315. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palmquist, E., & Hahn-Hagerdal, B. (2000). Bioresource Technology, 74, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walthers, T., Hensirisak, P., & Agblevor, A. F. (2001). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 91–93, 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa, S. M. A., Felipe, M. G. A., Silva, S. S., & Vitolo, M. (1998). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 70–72, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva, C. J. S. M., & Roberto, I. C. (2001). Processes in Biotechnology, 36, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigues, R. C. L. B., Felipe, M. G. A., Silva, J. B. A., Vitolo, M., & Gomez, P. V. (2001). Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 18(3), 299–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Felipe, M., Vitolo, M., Mancilha, I. M., & Silva, S. S. (1997). Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 18, 251–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayerhoff, Z. D. V. L., Roberto, I. C., & Franco, T. T. (2001). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 91–93, 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Canettieri, E. V., Almeida e Silva, J. B., & Felipe, M. G. A. (2001). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 91–93, 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cantarella, M., Cantarella, L., Gallifuoco, A., Spera, A., & Alfani, F. (2004). Biotechnology Progress, 20(1), 200–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mussatto, S., Dragone, G., & Roberto, I. (2005). Process Biochemistry, 40, 3801–3806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva, S. S., Matos, Z. R., & Carvalho, W. (2005). Biotechnology Progress, 21, 1449–1452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao, R. S., Jyothi, C. P., Prakasham, R. S., Sarma, P. N., & Rao, L. V. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 1974–1978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sene, L., Felipe, M. G. A., Vitolo, M., Silva, S. S., & Mancilla, I. M. (1998). Journal of Basic Microbiology, 38, 61–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, C., Marcet, M., Almazan, O., & Jonsson, L. F. (2007). Bioresource Technology, 98, 1767–1773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues, R. C. L. B., Sene, L., Matos, G. S., Roberto, I. C., Pessoa Jr, A., & Felipe, M. G. A. (2006). Current Microbiology, 53, 53–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berlin, A., Maximenko, V., Bura, R., Kang, K.-Y., Gilkes, N., & Saddler, J. (2005). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93(5), 880–886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sampaio, F. C., Torre, P., Lopes Passos, F. M., Alencar de Moraes, C., Perego, P., & Converti, A. (2007). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 136, 165–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, O. T. (2004). The effect of pH and hemicellulose derived inhibitors on xylitol biosynthesis. Masters thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.

  25. Duarte, L. C., Carvalheiro, F., Neves, I., & Gírio, F. M. (2005). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 121, 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olsson, L., & Hahn-Hagerdal, B. (1996). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 18, 312–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fitzgerald, J. D., Stratford, M., Gasson, M. J., & Narbad, A. (2005). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 1769–1775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Delgenes, J. P., Moletta, R., & Navarro, J. M. (1996). Enzyme Microbial Technology, 19, 220–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dominguez, J. M., Gong, C. S., & Tsao, G. T. (1996). Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 30, 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ding, X., & Xia, L. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 133, 263–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanchez, B., & Bautista, J. (1988). Enzyme Microbial Technology, 10, 315–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberto, I. C., Lacis, L. C., Barbosa, M. F. S., & Mancilha, I. M. (1991). Process Biochemistry, 26, 15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez, A., Rodriguez, M. E., York, S. W., Preston, J. F., & Ingram, L. O. (2000). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 69, 526–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Keating, J. D., Panganiban, C., & Mansfield, S. D. (2006). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93(6), 1196–1206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, C., Jones, O., Barnhart, C. et al. Effect of Furfural, Vanillin and Syringaldehyde on Candida guilliermondii Growth and Xylitol Biosynthesis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 148, 97–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8103-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8103-1

Keywords

Navigation