Angle J, Wissman DA. Age, reading, and myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55:302–308.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Sperduto RD, Seigel D, Roberts L, Rowland M. Prevalence of myopia in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;101:405–407.
Google Scholar
Working Group on Myopia Prevalence and Progression. Myopia: Prevalence and Progression. Washington, DC, National Academy Press; 1989.
Google Scholar
Young FA, Leary GA, Baldwin WR, et al. The transmission of refractive errors within Eskimo families. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1969;46:676–685.
CAS
Google Scholar
Framingham Offspring Eye Study Group. Familial aggregation and prevalence of myopia in the Framingham Offspring Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:326–332.
Google Scholar
Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein, et al. Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:4344–4377.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Saw S-M, Katz J, Schein OD, Chew S-J, Chan T-K. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:175–187.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Bear JC, Richler A, Burke G. Nearwork and familial resemblances in ocular refraction: a population study of Newfoundland. Clin Genet. 1981;19:462–472.
PubMed
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kaufman PL. Aecommodation and presbyopia: neuromuscular and biophysical aspects. In: Hart WM Jr, ed. Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. St Louis, Mo, Mosby-Year Book; 1992:390–411.
Google Scholar
Holladay JT, Craby TV, Koch DD. Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:429–443.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Restivo L, Almazar D, Moreno L, et al. A comparative study of PRK and LASIK techniques for the correction of moderate myopia [scientific poster]. In: Abstracts of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; 1998; Ft Lauderdale. Fla. Abstract 3439.
Goldstein BHS, Hersh PS, Brint SF, et al. PRK versus LASIK for moderate to high myopia: optical side effects [scientific poster]. In: Abstracts of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; 1998; Ft Lauderdale, Fla. Abstract 3441.
Pineda AA, Jaramillo J, Jaramillo M. PRK vs. LASIK for low and moderate myopia [scientific poster]. In: Abstracts of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; 1998; Ft Lauderdale, Fla. Abstract 3440.
Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: a randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1512–1523.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
El Danasoury MA, el Maghraby A, Klyce SD, Mehrez K. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting low myopia (from −2.00 to −5.50 diopters): a randomized study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:411–420.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Steinert RF, Hersh PS, for the Summit Technology PRK-LASIK Study Group. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:197–221.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar