Skip to main content
Log in

Using flash visually evoked potential in predicting final visual acuity in severely injured eyes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Ophthalmology

Abstract

This prospective clinical study was undertaken to assess the value of flash visually evoked potential (FVEP) in predicting postoperative visual acuity levels in severely injured eyes with opaque media. We found that FVEP testing at 10 Hz stimuli is of sufficient predictive value for postoperative visual outcome in most cases with severe eye trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hutton WL, Fuller DG. Factors influencing final visual results in severely injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:715–722.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuller DG, Hutton WL. Prediction of postoperative vision in eyes with severe trauma. Retina. 1990;10:24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg RS. Medical Epidemiology. East Norwlk, Conn.: Appleton and Lange; 1993;60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon D, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:240–243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Juan E, Strenberg P, Michels RG. Penetrating ocular injuries. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1318–1322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H., Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:911–916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pieramici DJ, MacCumber MW, Humayun MU, Marsh MJ, De Juan E. Open globe injury: update on types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1798–1803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crews SJ, Thompson CRS, Harding GFA. The ERG and VEP in patients with severe eye injury. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1978;15:203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Contestabile MT, Suppressa F, Vincenti P, D'Alba E, Gullace R. Flash visual-evoked potentials and flash electroretinography in the preoperative visual prognosis of eyes with cataracts. Ann Ophthalmol. 1991;23:416–421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsinapoulos T, Karyophyllis K, Konstas P. Electroretinography in the detection of functional conduction of the retina in cataract. Arch Ophthalmol Soc Northern Greece. 1972;18:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein GW. Clinical aspects of the visually evoked potentials. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1977;75:627–673.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Perry NW, Chielders DG. The Human Visual Evoked Response. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas; 1969;12–48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilker SS, Sobaci G, Yildirim E. The normal values of ERG, EOG, flash VER and pattern VER in our populations. Turk Oftalmol Gaz. 1992;22:193–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Tatar is in private practice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sobaci, G., Mutlu, F.M., Söyler, M. et al. Using flash visually evoked potential in predicting final visual acuity in severely injured eyes. Ann Ophthalmol 32, 63–65 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12009-000-0015-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12009-000-0015-4

Keywords

Navigation