Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of naked and non-manifold errors on polymer printing process

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D printing technology is rapidly evolving from small scale to large-scale industries because of the ease of achieving complex geometries with minimal time. Because none of the manufacturing processes is 100% efficient in the same way, the 3D printing process has a few drawbacks between the printing methodologies. In this study we focus on the effects of design errors on the final object. As we know majorly, we have two types of errors naked edges and non-manifold edges. These errors can occur in various ways during the design process. These design errors directly affect the printing layers, surface quality, and infill density of components. Naked edges directly affect the printing layers whereas non-manifold edges affect the infill and surface quality of the component. Because we have different slicing software’s each software has its own limits to read the design errors, but the effect of naked edges is the same in all slicing software’s and the effect of non-manifold edges is different for different software’s. Based on the type of design error, size of the error and position of the error we developed permanent and temporary solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pouyan, A., Cooke, Megan E., Weber, Michael H., Rosenzweig, Derek H.: Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 9, 1713 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghilan, Alina, Chiriac, Aurica P., Nita, Loredana E., Rusu, Alina G., Neamtu, Iordana, Chiriac, Vlad Mihai: trends in 3D printing processes for biomedical field: opportunities and challenges. J. Polym. Environ. 28, 1345–1367 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3D printed copper rocket engine part on way to Mars” Metal Powder Report, Volume 70, Issue 2015 Elsevier, Pages 196-197, ISSN 0026-0657

  4. Sandeep Kumar, Y., Rajeswara Rao, K.V.S., Yalamalle, Sunil R., Venugopal, S.M., Krishna, Sandeep: Applications of 3D printing in TKR pre surgical planning for design optimization – a case study. Mater. Today: Proceed. 5, 18833–18838 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shahrubudin, N., Koshy, P., Alipal, J., Kadir, M.H.A., Lee, T.C.: “Challenges of 3D printing technology for manufacturing biomedical products: a case study of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Sci. Direct. 6(4), e03734 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wei, Can, Solanki, Nayan G., Vasoya, Jaydip M., Shah, Ankita V., Serajuddin, Abu T.M..: Development of 3D printed tablets by fused deposition modeling using polyvinyl alcohol as polymeric matrix for rapid drug release. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 109, 1558–1572 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harshitha, V., Rao, Seeram Srinivasa: Design and analysis of ISO standard bolt and nut in FDM 3D printer using PLA and ABS materials. Mater Today: Proceed. 19(2), 583–588 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. “STL File Repair in Rhinoceros” Copyright © 2004 Robert McNeel & Associates. All rights reserved.

  9. Paramasivam Sindhu, V., Singh, G., Santhanakrishnan, S.: 3D printing of human anatomical models for preoperative surgical planning. Proc. Manufact. 48, 684–690 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prakash, B.S.: 3D-printing of skull bone from CT scan data. Mater. Today: Proceed. 28(4), 2447–2451 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eltes, P.E., Kiss, L., Bartos, M., et al.: Geometrical accuracy evaluation of an affordable 3D printing technology for spine physical models. J. Clini. Neurosci. 72, 438–446 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. song, R., Telenko, C.: Causes of desktop FDM fabrication failures in an open studio environment. Proced. CIRP. 80, 494–499 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciobota, Nastase-Dan.: Standard tessellation language in rapid prototyping technology. Natl. Instit. Res. Developm. Mechatron. Measure. Tech. 7, 5–81 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramesh Raju, N., Manikandan, D Palanisamy, Arulkirubakaran, D., Binoj, J.S., Thejasree, P., Ahilan, C.: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing. In: Palani, I.A., Sathiya, P., Palanisamy, D. (eds.) Recent Advances in Materials and Modern Manufacturing Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 109–128. Springer, Singapore (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Varma, M.M.M.K., Baghel, P.K., Raju, R.: Additive Manufacturing of Thermosetting Resins In-Situ Carbon Fibers: A Review. In: Palani, I.A., Sathiya, P., Palanisamy, D. (eds.) Recent Advances in Materials and Modern Manufacturing Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 15–49. Springer, Singapore (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thirugnanasambantham, K.G., Francis, A., Ramesh, R., Aravind, M., Reddy, Medagam Kesava: Investigation of erosion mechanisms on IN-718 based turbine blades under water jet conditions. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00910-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Francis, A., Thirugnanasambantham, K.G., Ramesh, R., et al.: High-temperature erosion and its mechanisms of IN-738 superalloy under hot air jet conditions. Int J Interact Des Manuf (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01013-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh, Raju M., Varma, Murali M.K.., Baghel, Pushp Kumar: Optimization of process parameters for 3D printing process using Taguchi based grey approach. Mater. Today Proceed. 25(2), 109–154 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharavathu Naresh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naresh, D. Effect of naked and non-manifold errors on polymer printing process. Int J Interact Des Manuf 17, 1417–1428 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01099-2

Keywords

Navigation