Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper presents a model to conceptualize interactivity to help people involved in interaction design. Previous studies on interactivity prototyping focus on tools to implement interactivity concepts. Little is found on models for conceptualizing interactivity. Our objective is to suggest an analytic model to explore the whole user experience by examining the degree of interactivity of a product. This is achieved by interpreting the notion of interactivity as conversation. A conceptualization model, named MCI (model for conceptualizing interactivity), was developed to measure the degree of interactivity. The model can be used to measure and compare the level of user engagement, which in many situations is used as an indication of positive user experience. We illustrate how the model can be used to analyze interactivity in three audio recorder design projects. The proposed model is expected to lead to an interactivity prototyping tool for various product categories including interactive media installations, tangible media, and other intelligent digital products in a ubiquitous computing environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avrahami, D., Hudson, S.E.: Forming interactivity: a tool for rapid prototyping of physical interactive products. In: Proceedings of DIS’02 (2002)

  2. Bucannen R.: Design research and the new learning. Des. Issues 17(4), 3–23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buxton B.: Sketching User Experience: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language user guide. Addison Wesley Longman, Redwood City (1999)

  5. Crawford C.: The Art of Interactive Design. No Starch Press, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, A., Gouldstone, J., Zigelbaum, J., Ishii, H.: Simplicity in interaction design. In: Proceedings of TEI’07 (2007)

  7. Davis, R., Colwell, B., Landay, J.: K-Sketch: A “Kinetic” sketch pad for novice animators. In: Proceedings of CHI’08 (2008)

  8. Djajadiningrat, J.P., Gaver, W., Fres, J.: Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In: Proceedings of DIS’00, pp. 66–71 (2000)

  9. Dore R., Pailhes J., Fischer X., Nadeau J.: Identification of sensory variables towards the integration of user requirements into preliminary design. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics 7(1), 1–11 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frens, J.: Designing for rich interaction: integrating form, interaction, and function. In: Proceedings of the 3RD Symposium of Design Research: Drawing New Territories, Swiss Design Network (2006)

  11. Grice H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds) Syntax and Semantics: Speech Act, vol. 3, pp. 43–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaver W., Dunne A., Pacenti E.: Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenbaum J., Kyng M.: Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg, S., Fitchett, C., Phidgets: Easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets. In: Proceedings of UIST’01 (2001)

  15. Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. In: Harel, D. (ed.) The Science of Computer Programming, pp. 231–274 (1987)

  16. Hartmann, B., Abdulla, L., Mittal, M., Klemmer, S.: Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition. In: Proceedings of CHI’07 (2007)

  17. Jensen, M.V.: A physical approach to tangible interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (2007)

  18. Jensen, V.J., Buur, J., Djajadiningrat, T.: Designing the user actions in tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: between Sense and Sensibility. ACM Press, New York (2005)

  19. Krasner G.E., Pope S.T.: A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface paradigm in Smalltalk-80. J. Object-Oriented Program. 1(3), 26–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Landay, J.A., Myers, B.A.: DENIM: interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 43–50 (1995)

  21. Microsoft Office Visio 2007, http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/visio. Accessed June 2008

  22. Moggridge B.: Designing Interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., Dow, S., Bolter, J.: DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium User Interface Software and Technology, UIST’04, pp. 197–206 (2004)

  24. Nam, T.-J.: Sketch-based rapid prototyping platform for hardware–software integrated interactive products. In: Proceedings of CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1689–1692. ACM Press, New York (2005)

  25. Kim, C., Nam, T.-J.: Talkative cushion: a phatic audio device to support family communication. In: Proceedings of CHI’09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 2631–2634. ACM Press, New York (2009)

  26. Poupyrev, I., Oba, H., Ikeda, T., Iwabuchi, E.: Designing embodied interfaces for casual sound recording devices. In: Proceedings of CHI’08 (2008)

  27. Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human–Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rafaeli S.: Interactivity: from new media to communication. In: Hawkins, R.P., Wiemann, J.M., Pingree, S. (eds) Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, vol. 16, pp. 110–134. Sage, Beverly Hills (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders E.B.N.: Generative tools for codesigning. In: Scrivener, S., Ball, L., Woodcock, A (eds) Collaborative Design, Springer, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schneidermain B.: Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. lEEE Comput. 16(8), 57–69 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Svanæs, D.: Understanding Interactivity; Steps to a Phenomenology of Human–Computer Interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (1999)

  32. Ullmer H., Ishii H.: Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst. J. 39(3–4), 915–931 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Visser F.S., Visser V.: Re-using Users: Co-create and Co-evaluate. Springer, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yim, J., Nam, T.: Developing tangible interaction and augmented reality in director. In: Proceedings of CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tek-Jin Nam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nam, TJ., Park, S. & Verlinden, J. A model to conceptualize interactivity. Int J Interact Des Manuf 3, 147–156 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-009-0069-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-009-0069-5

Keywords

Navigation