Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Resident Participation on Short-term Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

The influence of resident involvement on short-term outcomes after orthopaedic surgery is mostly unknown.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of our study were to examine the effects of resident involvement in surgical cases on short-term morbidity, mortality, operating time, hospital length of stay, and reoperation rate and to analyze these parameters by level of training.

Methods

The 2005–2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for 66,817 cases across six orthopaedic procedural domains: 28,686 primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs), 2412 revision TJAs, 16,832 basic and 5916 advanced arthroscopies, 8221 lower extremity traumas, and 4750 spine arthrodeses (fusions). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression and propensity scores were used to build models of risk adjustment. We compared the morbidity and mortality rates, length of operating time, hospital length of stay, and reoperation rate for cases with or without resident involvement. For cases with resident participation, we analyzed the same parameters by training level.

Results

Resident participation was associated with higher morbidity in TJAs (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; range, 1.4–1.9), lower extremity trauma (OR, 1.3; range, 1.2–1.5), and fusion (OR, 1.4; range, 1.2–1.7) after adjustment. However, resident involvement was not associated with increased mortality. Operative time was greater (all p < 0.001) with resident involvement in all procedural domains. Longer hospital length of stay was associated with resident participation in lower extremity trauma (p < 0.001) and fusion cases (p = 0.003), but resident participation did not affect length of stay in other domains. Resident involvement was associated with greater 30-day reoperation rates for cases of lower extremity trauma (p = 0.041) and fusion (p < 0.001). Level of resident training did not consistently influence surgical outcomes.

Conclusions

Results of our study suggest resident involvement in surgical procedures is not associated with increased short-term major morbidity and mortality after select cases in orthopaedic surgery. Findings of longer operating times and differences in minor morbidity should lead to future initiatives to provide resident surgical skills training and improve perioperative efficiency in the academic setting.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I. Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg. 2012;203:347–351; discussion 351–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Program specifics: ACS NSQIP data collection overview. Available at: http://acsnsqip.org/main/programspecs/program_data_collection.jsp. Accessed September 25, 2012.

  3. Anderson KL, Koval KJ, Spratt KF. Hip fracture outcome: is there a “July effect”? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38:606–611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Antonacci MD, Kean KE. Perioperative outcomes and complications related to teaching residents and fellows in scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:1113–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS. Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2002;80:569–593, v.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belmont PJ Jr, Davey S, Orr JD, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ. Risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications and mortality after below-knee amputation: a study of 2,911 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:370–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Learning curves in hip fracture surgery. Int Orthop. 2011;35:113–119.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cram P, Ibrahim SA, Lu X, Wolf BR. Impact of alternative coding schemes on incidence rates of key complications after total hip arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a national data set. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012;3:17–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curet MJ. Resident work hour restrictions: where are we now? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:767–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF. Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:96–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, Wan Y, Hanson T, Rettammel R, Winslow ER, Cho CS, Weber SM. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2126–2135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ, Heise CP, Foley EF, Kennedy GD. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:844–854.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernandez-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR. Impact of resident participation on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs: are residents slowing us down? J Surg Educ. 2012;69:746–752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itani KM, DePalma RG, Schifftner T, Sanders KM, Chang BK, Henderson WG, Khuri SF. Surgical resident supervision in the operating room and outcomes of care in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Am J Surg. 2005;190:725–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, Harnisch M. Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res. 2006;132:159–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. The resident as surgeon: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;178:126–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keeney JA, Adelani MA, Nunley RM, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL. Assessing readmission databases: how reliable is the information? J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8 suppl):72–76. e1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koval KJ, Rust CL, Spratt KF. The effect of hospital setting and teaching status on outcomes after hip fracture. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011;40:19–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawson EH, Louie R, Zingmond DS, Brook RH, Hall BL, Han L, Rapp M, Ko CY. A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2012;256:973–981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Wolf BR. Risk factors for thirty-day morbidity and mortality following knee arthroscopy: a review of 12,271 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e98 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moucha CS, Clyburn TA, Evans RP, Prokuski L. Modifiable risk factors for surgical site infection. Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:557–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortega G, Rhee DS, Papandria DJ, Yang J, Ibrahim AM, Shore AD, Makary MA, Abdullah F. An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;74:33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papandria D, Rhee D, Ortega G, Zhang Y, Gorgy A, Makary MA, Abdullah F. Assessing trainee impact on operative time for common general surgical procedures in ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:149–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel SP, Gauger PG, Brown DL, Englesbe MJ, Cederna PS. Resident participation does not affect surgical outcomes, despite introduction of new techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:540–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Privette AR, Shackford SR, Osler T, Ratliff J, Sartorelli K, Hebert JC. Implementation of resident work hour restrictions is associated with a reduction in mortality and provider-related complications on the surgical service: a concurrent analysis of 14,610 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:316–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Klocke NF, Callaghan JJ, Marsh JL. A risk calculator for short-term morbidity and mortality following hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:264–271.

  30. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S, Callaghan JJ. Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:193–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Dimick JB, Flynn T, Hall BL, Ko CY. The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:889–898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schoenfeld AJ, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Belmont PJ Jr. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1577–1582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoenfeld AJ, Serrano JA, Waterman BR, Bader JO, Belmont PJ Jr. The impact of resident involvement on post-operative morbidity and mortality following orthopaedic procedures: a study of 43,343 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1483–1491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143–2149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR, Khatri VP, Gauvin J, Bold RJ, Wisner D, Taylor S, Chen SL. Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:19–26; discussion 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Witjes S, Smolders JM, Beaule PE, Pasker P, Van Susante JL. Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:1293–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woolson ST, Kang MN. A comparison of the results of total hip and knee arthroplasty performed on a teaching service or a private practice service. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:601–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Pugely MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The authors’ institution and one author (AJP) received funding for this study from the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved or waived approval for the reporting of this case and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein. They have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Appendix 1. Inclusion CPT codes and frequency

Appendix 1. Inclusion CPT codes and frequency

Variable

CPT code

Frequency

Percentage

Primary total joint arthroplasty

 

27447

10,207

35.58

 

27130

18,479

64.42

Revision total joint arthroplasty

 

27134

843

34.95

 

27137

373

15.46

 

27138

142

5.89

 

27487

1054

43.70

Basic arthroscopy

 

29806

618

3.67

 

29807

790

4.69

 

29819

31

0.18

 

29820

28

0.17

 

29821

50

0.30

 

29824

415

2.47

 

29825

123

0.73

 

29826

2620

15.57

 

29828

78

0.46

 

29873

261

1.55

 

29874

167

0.99

 

29875

492

2.92

 

29876

358

2.13

 

29877

999

5.94

 

29879

477

2.83

 

29880

2299

13.66

 

29881

6572

39.04

 

29882

261

1.55

 

29883

57

0.34

 

29884

98

0.58

 

29885

4

0.02

 

29886

9

0.05

 

29887

25

0.15

Advanced arthroscopy

 

27403

1

0.02

 

27405

1

0.02

 

27407

1

0.02

 

27418

1

0.02

 

27427

1

0.02

 

27428

4

0.07

 

27429

1

0.02

 

27447

1

0.02

 

27599

1

0.02

 

27881

1

0.02

 

29827

2674

45.20

 

29868

2

0.03

 

29876

1

0.02

 

29877

2

0.03

 

29879

2

0.03

 

29880

35

0.59

 

29881

83

1.40

 

29882

16

0.27

 

29883

3

0.05

 

29888

3077

52.01

 

29889

8

0.14

Lower extremity trauma

 

27235

615

7.481

 

27236

1655

20.131

 

27244

772

9.391

 

27245

1534

18.660

 

27506

340

4.136

 

27759

327

3.978

 

27766

204

2.481

 

27769

15

0.182

 

27792

775

9.427

 

27814

888

10.802

 

27822

506

6.155

 

27823

131

1.593

 

27826

21

0.255

 

27827

146

1.776

 

27828

152

1.849

 

27829

140

1.703

Spine

 

22551

116

2.44

 

22554

530

11.16

 

22558

381

8.02

 

22590

10

0.21

 

22595

25

0.53

 

22600

108

2.27

 

22610

76

1.60

 

22612

1232

25.94

 

22614

117

2.46

 

22630

481

10.13

 

22800

22

0.46

 

22842

34

0.72

 

22851

16

0.34

 

63001

37

0.78

 

63003

12

0.25

 

63012

33

0.69

 

63015

21

0.44

 

63020

51

1.07

 

63030

1366

28.76

 

63040

11

0.23

 

63045

71

1.49

  1. CPT = Current Procedural Terminology.

About this article

Cite this article

Pugely, A.J., Gao, Y., Martin, C.T. et al. The Effect of Resident Participation on Short-term Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 2290–2300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3567-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3567-0

Keywords

Navigation