Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 472, Issue 5, pp 1597–1604 | Cite as

Can Internet Information on Vertebroplasty be a Reliable Means of Patient Self-education?

  • T. Barrett Sullivan
  • Joshua T. Anderson
  • Uri M. Ahn
  • Nicholas U. Ahn
Clinical Research



Studies of the quality and accuracy of health and medical information available on the Internet have shown that many sources provide inadequate information. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies analyzing the quality of information available online regarding vertebroplasty. Because this has been a high-volume procedure with highly debated efficacy, it is critical that patients receive complete, accurate, and well-balanced information before deciding a treatment course. Additionally, few studies have evaluated the merit of academic site authorship or site certification on information quality, but some studies have used measurements of quality that are based primarily on subjective criteria or information accuracy rather than information completeness.


The purposes of our study were (1) to evaluate and analyze the information on vertebroplasty available to the general public through the Internet; (2) to see if sites sponsored by academic institutions offered a higher quality of information; and (3) to determine whether quality of information varied according to site approval by a certification body.


Three search engines were used to identify 105 web sites (35 per engine) offering information regarding vertebroplasty. Sites were evaluated for authorship/sponsorship, content, and references cited. Information quality was rated as “excellent,” “high,” “moderate,” “low,” or “unacceptable.” Sites also were evaluated for contact information to set up an appointment. Data were analyzed as a complete set, then compared between authorship types, and finally evaluated by certification status. Academic sites were compared with other authorship groups and certified sites were compared with noncertified sites using Student’s t-test.


Appropriate indications were referenced in 74% of sites, whereas only 45% discussed a contraindication to the procedure. Benefits were expressed by 100% of sites, but risks were outlined in only 53% (p < 0.001). Ninety-nine percent of sites provided step-by-step descriptions of the procedure, and 44% of sites also included images. Alternative treatments were mentioned by 51% of sites. Twenty-seven percent of sites referenced peer-reviewed literature, 41% offered experiential or noncited data based on American populations, and 7% offered analogous data from international populations. Thirty percent of sites provided contact information for patient appointment scheduling. Seven percent of sites were classified as excellent quality, 6% as high quality, 11% as moderate quality, 19% as poor quality, and 57% as unacceptable. Sixteen percent of sites were sponsored by academic institutions, 62% by private groups, 8% by biomedical device companies, and 14% were sponsored otherwise. Academic sites reported fewer risks of the procedure than private sites or other sites (p = 0.05 and p = 0.04), but reported more risks than industry sites (p = 0.007). Academic sites were more likely than sites classified as other to offer contact information for patient appointment scheduling (p = 0.004). Nine percent of sites evaluated were Health on the Net Foundation (HONCode) certified. No association with improved information quality was observed in these sites relative to noncertified sites (all p > 0.05).


Internet information regarding vertebroplasty is not only inadequate for proper patient education, but also potentially misleading as sites are more likely to present benefits of the procedure than risks. Although academic sites might be expected to offer higher-quality information than private, industry, or other sites, our data would suggest that they do not. HONCode certification cannot be used reliably as a means of qualifying website information quality. Academic sites should be expected to set a high standard and alter their Internet presence with adequate information distribution. Certification bodies also should alter their standards to necessitate provision of complete information in addition to emphasizing accurate information. Treating physicians may want to counsel their patients regarding the limitations of information present on the Internet and the pitfalls of current certification systems.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Information Quality Vertebral Compression Fracture Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Certification Body Internet Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet: the case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1540–1543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berenson J, Pflugmacher R, Jarzem P, Zonder J, Schechtman K, Tillman JB, Bastian L, Ashraf T, Vrionis F; Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation (CAFE) Investigators. Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:225–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blasco J, Martinez-Ferrer A, Macho J, San Roman L, Pomes J, Carrasco J, Monegal A, Gunabens N, Peris P.||Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1159–1166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boonen S, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Cummings SR, Ranstam J, Tillman JB, Eastell R, Talmadge K, Wardlaw D. Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1627–1637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce-Brand RA, Baker JF, Byrne DP, Hogan NA, McCarthy T. Assessment of the quality of health information from American urologists’ websites using three validated tools. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:1095–1100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:557–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farrokhi MR, Alibai E, Maghami Z. Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus optimal medical management for the relief of pain and disability in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:561–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fast AM, Deibert CM, Hruby GW, Glassberg KI. Evaluating the quality of internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:151–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia RM, Messerschmitt PJ, Ahn NU. An evaluation of information on the Internet of a new device: the lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:52–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garfin SR, Buckley RA, Ledlie J; Balloon Kyphoplasty Outcomes Group. Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2213–2220.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerling, C, Eubanks J, Patel R, Whang PG, Bohlman HH, Ahn NU. Cement augmentation of refractory osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: survivorship analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1266–1269.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greene DL, Appel AJ, Reinert SE, Palumbo MA. Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:826–829.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grewal P, Alagaratnam S. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. Int J Surg. 2013;11:410–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hendrick P, Ahmed O, Bankier S, Chan T, Crawford SA, Ryder CR, Welsh LJ, Schneiders AG. Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites. Man Ther. 2012;17:318–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1897–1904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jenson ME, McGraw JK, Cardella JF, Hirsch JA. Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009;1:181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:569–579.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1085–1092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee HM, Park SY, Lee SH, Suh SW, Hong JY. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs): conservative treatment versus balloon kyphoplasty. Spine J. 2012;12:998–1005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of ‘kyphoplasty’ in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1631–1638.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285:320–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liszka HA, Steyer TE, Hueston WJ. Virtual medical care: how are our patients using online health information? J Community Health. 2006;31:368–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, Pieper CF, Martinez S, Mulhausen PL. Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med. 1993;94:595–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McNally SL, Donohue MC, Newton KP, Ogletree SP, Conner KK, Ingegneri SE, Kagnoff MF. Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the internet. Interact J Med Res. 2012;1:e1.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J. 2010;10:350–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nason GJ, Baker JF, Byrne DP, Noel J, Moore D, Kiely PJ. Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the “information highway” led to better information provision? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:E1364–1369.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nason GJ, Tareen F, Quinn F. Hydrocele on the web: an evaluation of Internet based information. Scand J Urol. 2013;47:152–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Old JL, Calvert M. Vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:111–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phillips FM, Ho E, Campbell-Hupp M, McNally T, Todd Wetzel F, Gupta P. Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:2260–2265.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prather H, Van Dillen L, Metzler JP, Riew KD, Gilula LA. Prospective measurement of function and pain in patients with non-neoplastic compression fractures treated with vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:334–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qureshi SA, Koehler SM, Lin JD, Bird J, Garcia RM, Hecht AC. An evaluation of information on the internet about a new device: the cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:881–883.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rose S, Bruce J, Maffulli N. Accessing the Internet for patient information about orthopedics. JAMA. 1998;280:1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Silverman SL. The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone. 1992;13(suppl 2):S27–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tavare AN, Alsafi A, Hamady MS. Analysis of the quality of information obtained about uterine artery embolization from the internet. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:1355–1362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang HK, Lu K, Liang CL, Weng HC, Wang KW, Tsai YD, Hsieh CH, Liliang PC. Comparing clinical outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Med. 2011;11:1659–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen S. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1016–1024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wong LM, Yan H, Margel D, Fleshner NE. Urologists in cyberspace: a review of the quality of health information from American urologists’ websites using three validated tools. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013,7:100–107.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Barrett Sullivan
    • 1
  • Joshua T. Anderson
    • 1
  • Uri M. Ahn
    • 2
  • Nicholas U. Ahn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.New Hampshire Spine InstituteBedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations