Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis in Patients Undergoing TKA: How Common and How Serious?

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

A CORR Insights to this article was published on 18 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Information on the coexistence of lumbar spondylosis and its influence on overall levels of pain and function in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would be valuable for patient consultation and management.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to document the prevalence and severity of coexisting lumbar spondylosis in patients with advanced knee OA undergoing TKA and to determine whether the coexisting lumbar spondylosis at the time of TKA adversely affects clinical scores in affected patients before and 2 years after TKA.

Methods

Radiographic lumbar spine degeneration and lumbar spine symptoms including lower back pain, radiating pain at rest, and radiating pain with activity were assessed in 225 patients undergoing TKA. In addition, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 scores were evaluated before and 2 years after TKA. Potential associations of radiographic lumbar spine degeneration and lumbar spine symptom severities with pre- and postoperative WOMAC subscales and SF-36 scores were examined.

Results

All 225 patients had radiographic degeneration of the lumbar spine, and the large majority (89% [200 of 225]) had either moderate or severe spondylosis (72% and 17%, respectively). A total of 114 patients (51%) had at least one moderate or severe lumbar spine symptom. No association was found between radiographic severity of lumbar spine degeneration and pre- and postoperative clinical scores. In terms of lumbar spine symptoms, more severe symptoms were likely to adversely affect the preoperative WOMAC and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) scores, but most of these adverse effects improved by 2 years after TKA with the exception of the association between severe radiating pain during activity and a poorer postoperative SF-36 PCS score (regression coefficient = −5.41, p = 0.015).

Conclusions

Radiographic lumbar spine degeneration and lumbar spine symptoms are common among patients with advanced knee OA undergoing TKA. Severe lumbar spine symptoms (visual analog scale score of ≥ 7) were likely to adversely affect the preoperative clinical scores of patients undergoing TKA; however, most of the adverse effects were not found 2 years after TKA. Nevertheless, because preexisting severe radiating pain during activity may be a source of a poorer outcome after TKA, careful patient consultation regarding this potential poorer prognosis after TKA needs to be provided to the patient with this symptom.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam RF, Noble J. Primary total knee arthroplasty in the elderly. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:495–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:834–840.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohl WR, Steffee AD. Lumbar spinal stenosis. A cause of continued pain and disability in patients after total hip arthroplasty. Spine. 1979;4:168–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;271:1349–1357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho HJ, Chang CB, Kim KW, Park JH, Yoo JH, Koh IJ, Kim TK. Gender and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis types in elderly Koreans. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:994–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG, Sporer SM. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:266–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:575–582.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank J. Revised Oswestry Disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:914–918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fogel GR, Esses SI. Hip spine syndrome: management of coexisting radiculopathy and arthritis of the lower extremity. Spine J. 2003;3:238–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harato K, Nagura T, Matsumoto H, Otani T, Toyama Y, Suda Y. A gait analysis of simulated knee flexion contracture to elucidate knee-spine syndrome. Gait Posture. 2008;28:687–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassett G, Hart DJ, Doyle DV, March L, Spector TD. The relation between progressive osteoarthritis of the knee and long term progression of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and lumbar spine. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:623–628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hicks GE, Morone N, Weiner DK. Degenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1301–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horikawa K, Kasai Y, Yamakawa T, Sudo A, Uchida A. Prevalence of osteoarthritis, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and spondylolisthesis among the elderly in a Japanese village. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:9–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapstad H, Hanestad BR, Langeland N, Rustoen T, Stavem K. Cutpoints for mild, moderate and severe pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee ready for joint replacement surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:687–694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim I, Kim HA, Seo YI, Song YW, Jeong JY, Kim DH. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in elderly community residents in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25:293–298.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Seong SC. Causes and predictors of patient’s dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:263–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McNamara MJ, Barrett KG, Christie MJ, Spengler DM. Lumbar spinal stenosis and lower extremity arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:273–277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reginster JY. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(Suppl 1):3–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Romano CL, Romano D, Bonora C, Mineo G. Pregabalin, celecoxib, and their combination for treatment of chronic low-back pain. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10:185–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sowers M. Epidemiology of risk factors for osteoarthritis: systemic factors. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:447–451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suri P, Morgenroth DC, Kwoh CK, Bean JF, Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Low back pain and other musculoskeletal pain comorbidities in individuals with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1715–1723.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A. Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:720–730.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zelman DC, Dukes E, Brandenburg N, Bostrom A, Gore M. Identification of cut-points for mild, moderate and severe pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Pain. 2005;115:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ja-Young Choi MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, for her help with radiographic evaluation and Sung Ju Kim MPH, for his help with the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Kyun Kim MD, PhD.

Additional information

This study was supported by the SNUBH Research Fund (06-2008-068, Principal Investigator: CBC).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at the Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, C.B., Park, K.W., Kang, Y.G. et al. Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis in Patients Undergoing TKA: How Common and How Serious?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 710–717 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3298-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3298-7

Keywords

Navigation