Skip to main content
Log in

CORR Insights™: Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis

  • CORR Insights™
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

The Original Article was published on 11 December 2012

Abstract

This CORR Insights™ is a commentary on the article “Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis” by Joseph T. Moskal MD and Susan G. Capps PhD available at DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng T, Feng JG, Liu T, Zhang XL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1473–1481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, Kuipers BM, Verheyen CC. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:200–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan RJ, Maor D, Hofmann M, Haebich S. A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: a randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:43–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krych AJ, Pagnano MW, Wood KC, Meneghini RM, Kaufmann K. No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:565–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Learmouth ID. Total hip replacement and the law of diminishing returns. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1664–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Matsoukis J. Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision: review of a continuous series of 103 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:8–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. New Zealand Joint Registry, 13-year report. 2012:15 Available at: www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/. Accessed December 28, 2012.

  8. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:156–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roth A. The minimally invasive anterolateral approach: a review of the literature. Orthopade. 2012;41:377–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sendtner E, Schuster T, Wörner M, Kalteis T, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop. 2011;35:809–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco P. Pitto MD, PhD, FRACS.

Additional information

The author certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial association (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

This CORR Insights™ comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5.

About this article

Cite this article

Pitto, R.P. CORR Insights™: Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 1295–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z

Keywords

Navigation