Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Which is the Best Alternative for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly?: A Meta-Analysis

  • Survey
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures includes internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, whether arthroplasty or internal fixation is the primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients remains a subject for debate. The literature contains conflicting evidence regarding rates of mortality, revision surgery, major postoperative complications, and function in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated either by internal fixation or arthroplasty (either hemiarthroplasty or THA).

Questions/purpose

We determined mortality, revision surgery rates, major surgical complications (which include infection, nonunion or early redisplacement, avascular necrosis, dislocation, loosening of the prosthesis, acetabular erosion, fracture below or around the implant, and other severe general complications such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), and function in patients treated with either internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing internal fixation and arthroplasty. We identified 20 RCTs with 4508 patients meeting all the criteria for eligibility. We performed a meta-analysis of the major complications, reoperations, function, pain, and mortality.

Results

Compared with internal fixation, arthroplasty reduced the risk of the major complications (95% CI, 0.21–0.54 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.16–0.31 for 5 years) and the incidence of reoperation 1 to 5 years after surgery (95% CI, 0.15–0.34 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.08–0.24 for 5 years), and provided better pain relief (95% CI, 0.34–0.72). Function was superior (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.79) for patients treated with arthroplasty than for patients treated by internal fixation. However, mortality 1 to 3 years after surgery was similar (95% CI, 0.96–1.23, p = 0.20 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.91–1.17, p = 0.63 for 3 years).

Conclusions

Arthroplasty can reduce the risk of major complications and the incidence of reoperation compared with internal fixation, and provide better pain relief and function, but it does not reduce mortality.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2456–2463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Obremskey W, Koval KJ, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Guyatt GH. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1673–1681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Hemiarthroplasty in worst cases is better than internal fixation in best cases of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective study of 683 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:368–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359:1761–1767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur: a prospective randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:206–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE. Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335:1251–1254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedlund R, Lindgren U, Ahlbom A. Age- and sex-specific incidence of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures: an analysis based on 20,538 fractures in Stockholm County, Sweden, 1972–1981. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;222:132–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heetveld MJ, Raaymakers EL, Luitse JS, Nijhof M, Gouma DJ. Femoral neck fractures: can physiologic status determine treatment choice? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:203–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hudson JI, Kenzora JE, Hebel JR, Gardner JF, Scherlis L, Epstein RS, Magaziner JS. Eight-year outcome associated with clinical options in the management of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson T, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Wahlström O. Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:597–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jónsson B, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Fredin H, Johnell O. Social function after cervical hip fracture: a comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:431–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty: treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older people. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:249–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardsson O, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Akesson K, Rogmark C. Long-term follow-up of replacement compared with internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures: results at ten years in a randomised study of 450 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:406–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck: a meta analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:15–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Neander G, Adolphson P, Von Sivers K, Dahlborn M, Dalén N. Bone and muscle mass after femoral neck fracture: a controlled quantitative computed tomography study of osteosynthesis versus primary total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:470–474.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture. BMJ. 2006;333:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker MJ, Khan RJ, Crawford J, Pryor GA. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: a randomized trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1150–1155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Puolakka TJ, Laine HJ, Tarvainen T, Aho H. Thompson hemiarthroplasty is superior to Ullevaal screws in treating displaced femoral neck fractures in patient over 75 years: a prospective randomized study with two-year follow-up. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2001;90:225–228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur: 13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury. 2000;31:793–797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rödén M, Schön M, Fredin H. Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiprostheses in l00 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:42–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I. A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur: functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:183–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogmark C, Johnell O. Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:359–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shepherd SM, Prescott RJ. Use of standardised assessment scales in elderly hip fracture patients. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996;30:335–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sierra RJ, Raposo JM, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Dislocation of primary THA done through a posterolateral approach in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:262–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sikorski JM, Barrington R. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:357–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Skinner P, Riley D, Ellery J, Beaumont A, Coumine R, Shafighian B. Displaced subcapital fractures of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement. Injury. 1989;20:291–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:189–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Söreide O, Mölster A, Raugstad TS. Internal fixation versus primary prosthetic replacement in acute femoral neck fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Br J Surg. 1979;66:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Svenningsen S, Benum P, Nesse O, Furset OI. [Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a comparison of 3 methods of treatment] [in Norwegian]. Nord Med. 1985;100:256–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thomsen NO, Jensen CM, Skovgaard N, Pedersen MS, Pallesen P, Soe-Nielsen NH, Rosenklint A. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of fractures of the neck of the femur using Garden’s system. Int Orthop. 1996;20:326–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Söderqvist A, Törnkvist H. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:380–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van Vugt AB, Oosterwijk WM, Goris RJ. Osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis in the treatment of unstable intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993;113:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Jiang B, Marshall RJ, Zhang P. Arthroplasty or internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures: which is the optimal alternative for elderly patients? A meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1179–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Shandong, 250033, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Hongwei Gao MD, Zhonghao Liu MD & Mingzhi Gong MD, PhD

  2. Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Shandong, 250033, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Deguo Xing MD

Authors
  1. Hongwei Gao MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhonghao Liu MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deguo Xing MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingzhi Gong MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingzhi Gong MD, PhD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of their immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, H., Liu, Z., Xing, D. et al. Which is the Best Alternative for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly?: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 1782–1791 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2250-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2250-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation