Skip to main content
Log in

Endoprosthetic Treatment is More Durable for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Pathologic proximal femur fractures result in substantial morbidity for patients with skeletal metastases. Surgical treatment is widely regarded as effective; however, failure rates associated with the most commonly used operative treatments are not well defined.

Questions/purposes

We therefore compared surgical treatment failure rates among intramedullary nailing, endoprosthetic reconstruction, and open reduction-internal fixation when applied to impending or displaced pathologic proximal femur fractures.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively compared the clinical course of 298 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing (n = 82), endoprosthetic reconstruction (n = 197), or open reduction-internal fixation (n = 19) from 1993 to 2008. Primary outcome was treatment failure, which was defined as reoperation for any reason. Treatment groups were compared for differences in demographic and clinical parameters.

Results

The number of treatment failures in the endoprosthetic reconstruction group (3.1%) was significantly lower than in the intramedullary nailing (6.1%) and open reduction-internal fixation (42.1%) groups. The number of revisions requiring implant exchange also was significantly lower for endoprosthetic reconstruction (0.5%), compared with intramedullary nailing (6.1%) and open reduction-internal fixation (42.1%).

Conclusions

Endoprosthetic reconstruction is associated with fewer treatment failures and greater implant durability. Prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of operative strategy on function and quality of life.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barwood SA, Wilson JL, Molnar RR, Choong PF. The incidence of acute cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunction following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral metastasis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:147–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Ed 7. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrington KD. The use of methylmethacrylate as an adjunct in the internal fixation of unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:744–750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrington KD. The management of malignant pathologic fractures. Instr Course Lect. 1977;26:147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Healey JH, Lane JM. Treatment of pathologic fractures of the distal femur with the Zickel supracondylar nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:216–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GJ, Zhang H, Sim FH. Complications and results of arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of malignant pathologic fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lane JM, Sculco TP, Zolan S. Treatment of pathological fractures of the hip by endoprosthetic replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:954–959.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:256–264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nathan SS, Healey JH, Mellano D, Hoang B, Lewis I, Morris CD, Athanasian EA, Boland PJ. Survival in patients operated on for pathologic fracture: implications for end-of-life orthopedic care. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6072–6082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patterson BM, Healey JH, Cornell CN, Sharrock NE. Cardiac arrest during hip arthroplasty with a cemented long-stem component: a report of seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:271–277.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peter RE, Schopfer A, Le Coultre B, Hoffmeyer P. Fat embolism and death during prophylactic osteosynthesis of a metastatic femur using an unreamed femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:233–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarahrudi K, Greitbauer M, Platzer P, Hausmann JT, Heinz T, Vécsei V. Surgical treatment of metastatic fractures of the femur: a retrospective analysis of 142 patients. J Trauma. 2009;66:1158–1163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Talbot M, Turcotte RE, Isler M, Normandin D, Iannuzzi D, Downer P. Function and health status in surgically treated bone metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:215–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Townsend PW, Rosenthal HG, Smalley SR, Cozad SC, Hassanein RE. Impact of postoperative radiation therapy and other perioperative factors on outcome after orthopedic stabilization of impending or pathologic fractures due to metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:2345–2350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Townsend PW, Smalley SR, Cozad SC, Rosenthal HG, Hassanein RE. Role of postoperative radiation therapy after stabilization of fractures caused by metastatic disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:43–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ward WG, Holsenbeck S, Dorey FJ, Spang J, Howe D. Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415(suppl):S230–S244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wedin R, Bauer HC. Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1653–1657.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Steensma MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors (MS) have received support from the Major Family Fellowship in Musculoskeletal Oncology.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

About this article

Cite this article

Steensma, M., Boland, P.J., Morris, C.D. et al. Endoprosthetic Treatment is More Durable for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 920–926 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2047-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2047-z

Keywords

Navigation