Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 469, Issue 8, pp 2248–2259 | Cite as

Bone Quality: Educational Tools for Patients, Physicians, and Educators

  • Junaid Shams
  • Allison B. Spitzer
  • Ann M. Kennelly
  • Laura L. Tosi
Symposium: Bone Quality: From Bench to Bedside

Abstract

Background

Defining bone quality remains elusive. From a patient perspective bone quality can best be defined as an individual’s likelihood of sustaining a fracture. Fracture risk indicators and performance measures can help clinicians better understand individual fracture risk. Educational resources such as the Web can help clinicians and patients better understand fracture risk, communicate effectively, and make decisions concerning diagnosis and treatment.

Questions/purposes

We examined four questions: What tools can be used to identify individuals at high risk for fracture? What clinical performance measures are available? What strategies can help ensure that patients at risk for fracture are identified? What are some authoritative Web sites for educating providers and patients about bone quality?

Methods

Using Google, PUBMED, and trademark names, we reviewed the literature using the terms “bone quality” and “osteoporosis education.” Web site legitimacy was evaluated using specific criteria. Educational Web sites were limited to English-language sites sponsored by nonprofit organizations

Results

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool® (FRAX®) and the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) are reliable means of assessing fracture risk. Performance measures relating to bone health were developed by the AMA convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement® and are included in the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. In addition, quality measures have been developed by the Joint Commission. Strategies for identifying individuals at risk include designating responsibility for case finding and intervention, evaluating secondary causes of osteoporosis, educating patients and providers, performing cost-effectiveness evaluation, and using information technology. An abundance of authoritative educational Web sites exists for providers and patients.

Conclusions

Effective clinical indicators, performance measures, and educational tools to better understand and identify fracture risk are now available. The next challenge is to encourage broader use of these resources so that individuals at high risk for fracture will not just be identified but will also adhere to therapy.

References

  1. 1.
    American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. National Action Plan for Bone Health. Available at: http://www.asbmr.org/Advocacy/NAP.aspx. Accessed March 7, 2011.
  2. 2.
    Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM. Population screening for osteoporosis risk: a randomised control trial of medication use and fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:561–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR. A randomized study of two different information based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1309–1317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM. Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302:1573–1579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri/. Accessed March 7, 2011.
  9. 9.
    Cohen K, Maier D. Osteoporosis: evaluation of screening patterns in a primary-care group practice. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:498–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper C. The epidemiology of fragility fractures: is there a role for bone quality? Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;53(Suppl 1):S23–S26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cranney A, Lam M, Ruhland L, Brison R, Godwin M, Harrison MM, Harrison MB, Anastassiades T, Grimshaw JM, Graham ID. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1733–1740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curtis JR, Carbone L, Cheng H, Hayes B, Laster A, Matthews R, Saag KG, Sepanski R, Tanner SB, Delzell E. Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older Americans, 1999–2005. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1061–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dawson-Hughes B, Looker AC, Tosteson AN, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd. The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:41–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson ANA, Melton LJ 3rd, Baim S, Favus ML, Khosla S, Lindsay RL. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:449–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dell R, Greene D, Schelkun SR, Williams K. Osteoporosis disease management: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dumitrescu B, van Helden S, ten Broeke R, Nieuwenhuijzen-Kruseman A, Wyers C, Udrea G, van der Linden S, Geusens P. Evaluation of patients with a recent clinical fracture and osteoporosis, a multidisciplinary approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ebeling PR. Clinical practice. Osteoporosis in men. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1474–1482.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edwards BJ, Langman CB, Bunta AD, Vicuna M, Favus M. Secondary contributors to bone loss in osteoporosis related hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:991–999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:767–778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ettinger B. A personal perspective on fracture risk assessment tools. Menopause. 2008;15:1023–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    FORE Foundation for Osteoporosis Research and Education. 10-year Fracture Risk Calculator. Available at: http://riskcalculator.fore.org/. Accessed March 7, 2011.
  22. 22.
    FRAX®. WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.jsp. Accessed March 8, 2011.
  23. 23.
    Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, Strom BL, Lowe RA. Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1063–1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Demetrakopoulos D, Koob J, Hong R, Rana A, Lin JT, Lane JM. Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:3–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gardner MJ, Flik KR, Mooar P, Lane JM. Improvement in the undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1342–1348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD. Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;35:293–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glowacki J, Harris MB, Simon J, Wright J, Kolatkar NS, Thornhill TS, Leboff MS. Brigham fracture intervention team initiatives for hospital patients with hip fractures: a paradigm shift. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:590751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haaland DA, Cohen DR, Kennedy CC, Khalidi NA, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A. Closing the osteoporosis care gap: increased osteoporosis awareness among geriatrics and rehabilitation teams. BMC Geriatr. 2009;9:28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrington JT, Broy SB, Derosa AM, Licata AA, Shewmon DA. Hip fracture patients are not treated for osteoporosis: a call to action. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47:651–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harrington JT, Deal CL. Successes and failures in improving osteoporosis care after fragility fracture: results of a multiple-site clinical improvement project. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:724–728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal S, Bogoch E. The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:171–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Bansod V, Salbach NM, Zwarenstein M, Carroll J, Brooks D, Cameron C, Bogoch E, Jaakkimainen L, Kreder H. A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:265–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Dawson-Hughes B, Melton LJ 3rd, McCloskey EV. The effects of a FRAX revision for the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:35–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:385–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuo I, Ong C, Simmons L, Bliuc D, Eisman J, Center J. Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporosis Int. 2007;18:1633–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    LaBresh KA, Ellrodt AG, Gliklich R, Liljestrand J, Peto R. Get With the Guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:203–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    LeBoff MS, Kohlmeier L, Hurwitz S, Franklin J, Wright J, Glowacki J. Occult vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal US women with acute hip fracture. JAMA.1999;281:1505–1511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee TH. Eulogy for a quality measure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1175–1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A. Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA. 2009;302:883–889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Morrish DW, Maksymowych WP, Rowe BH. Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2008;178:569–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C. The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:1028–1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mechanic D. Replicating high-quality medical care organizations. JAMA. 2010;303:555–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. The state of health care quality: 2009. Available at: www.ncqa.org/tabid/836/Default.aspx. Accessed March 7, 2011.
  44. 44.
    Nayak S, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL. Factors associated with diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1963–1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Newman ED, Ayoub WT, Starkey RH, Diehl JM, Wood GC. Osteoporosis disease management in a rural health care population: hip fracture reduction and reduced costs in postmenopausal women after 5 years. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:146–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN. Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:255–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, Dieckmann N. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Siris ES, Bilezikian JP, Rubin MR, Black DM, Bockman RS, Bone HG, Hochberg MC, McClung MR, Schnitzer TJ. Pins and plaster aren’t enough: a call for the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:3482–3486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Skedros JG, Holyoak JD, Pitts TC. Knowledge and opinions of orthopaedic surgeons concerning medical evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:18–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Solomon DH, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM, Arnold M, Licari A, Cabral D, Canning C, Avorn J, Katz JN. A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:760–767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Streeten EA, Mohamed A, Gandhi A, Orwig D, Sack P, Sterling R, Pellegrini VD Jr. The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1968–1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Switzer JA, Jaglal S, Bogoch ER. Overcoming barriers to osteoporosis care in vulnerable elderly patients with hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:454–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tosi LL, Gliklich R, Kannan K, Koval KJ. The American Orthopaedic Association’s ‘Own the Bone’ initiative to prevent secondary fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:163–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tosteson ANA, Melton LJ 2nd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:437–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    US Preventive Services Task Force, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Screening for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsoste.htm. Accessed March 8, 2011.
  56. 56.
    Warriner AH, Curtis JR. Adherence to osteoporosis treatments: room for improvement. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:356–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Watts BN. Bone quality: getting closer to a definition. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1139–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weiss TW, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, McHorney CA. Osteoporosis practice patterns in 2006 among primary care physicians participating in the NORA study. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:1473–1480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yood RA, Mazor KM, Andrade SE, Emani S, Chan W, Kahler KH. Patient decision to initiate therapy for osteoporosis: the influence of knowledge and beliefs. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1815–1821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junaid Shams
    • 1
  • Allison B. Spitzer
    • 1
  • Ann M. Kennelly
    • 2
  • Laura L. Tosi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.George Washington University School of MedicineWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Bone Health Program, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports MedicineChildren’s National Medical CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations