Skip to main content
Log in

Alloprosthetic Composite is a Suitable Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Resection of a tumor of the pelvis is most disabling when the acetabulum is excised and a durable reconstruction of the defect is hard to achieve. All available methods are associated with frequent complications. Few large series have been published, and fewer have focused entirely on complete resections of the acetabulum. The use of an allograft-prosthetic composite allows customization on the operating table. However, while such composites restore anatomy and function of the pelvis the use of pelvic allografts is controversial and the durability is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We therefore examined (1) the frequency of allograft and prosthetic failure, (2) positive and negative factors influencing the survival of the allograft prosthetic composite, and (3) function of patients with this reconstruction.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 35 patients who had resection of the entire acetabulum and reconstruction with an allograft-prosthetic composite. Function was scored by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system. Followup in 24 survivors averaged 120 months (range, 61–188 months).

Results

Greater than 75% of the allografts were still in place at last followup, and the original prosthetic reconstruction was still in place in 56%. Infection was an important negative factor for allograft survival. The average functional score was 72%, with better mean scores for patients who had reconstruction with a stemmed cup and an artificial ligament (average 89%).

Conclusions

An allograft-prosthetic composite provides a versatile substitution of the pelvis and hip, with functional scores approximately 75% of normal.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W, Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;314:203–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, Buconjic T, McGoveran B, Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma: intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1663–1674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle MJ, Hornicek FJ, Robinson DS, Mnaymneh W. Internal hemipelvectomy for solitary pelvic thyroid cancer metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2000;75:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Capanna R, van Horn JR, Guernelli N, Briccoli A, Ruggieri P, Biagini R, Bettelli G, Campanacci M. Complications of pelvic resections. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1987;106:71–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:579–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:731–746.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs B, O’Connor MI, Kaufman KR, Padgett DJ, Sim FH. Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerrand CH, Bell RS, Griffin AM, Wunder JS. Instability after major tumor resection: prevention and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001:32:697–710, ix–x.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jaiswal PK, Aston WJ, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter S, Blunn G, Briggs TW, Cannon S. Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1222–1227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HS, Kim KJ, Han I, Oh JH, Lee SH. The use of pasteurized autologous grafts for periacetabular reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:217–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kollender Y, Shabat S, Bickels J, Flusser G, Isakov J, Neuman Y, Cohen I, Weyl-Ben-Arush M, Ramo N, Meller I. Internal hemipelvectomy for bone sarcomas in children and young adults: surgical considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of hemipelvis reconstruction with allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:178–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langlais F, Vielpeau C. Allografts of the hemipelvis after tumor resection: technical aspects of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:58–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Gebhardt MC. Malignant tumors of the pelvis: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:212–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. High complication rates with pelvic allografts: experience of 22 sarcoma resections. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:333–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida Y, Osaka S, Mankin HJ. Hemipelvic allograft reconstruction after periacetabular bone tumor resection. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Elettra Pignotti for reviewing all statistical data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry DeGroot MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at the Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

About this article

Cite this article

Donati, D., Di Bella, C., Frisoni, T. et al. Alloprosthetic Composite is a Suitable Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 1450–1458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1799-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1799-9

Keywords

Navigation