Health literacy is the single best predictor of an individual’s health status. It is important to customize health-related education material to the individual patient’s level of reading skills. Readability of a given text is the objective measurement of the reading skills one should possess to understand the written material.
In this article, some of the commonly used readability assessment tools are discussed and guidelines to improve the comprehension of patient education handouts are provided.
Where are we now? Several healthcare organizations have recommended the readability of patient education materials be no higher than sixth- to eighth-grade level. However, most of the patient education materials currently available on major orthopaedic Web sites are written at a reading level that may be too advanced for comprehension by a substantial proportion of the population.
Where do we need to go?
There are several readily available and validated tools for assessing the readability of written materials. While use of audiovisual aids such as video clips, line drawings, models, and charts can enhance the comprehension of a health-related topic, standard readability tools cannot construe such enhancements.
How do we get there?
Given the variability in the capacity to comprehend health-related materials among individuals seeking orthopaedic care, stratifying the contents of patient education materials at different levels of complexity will likely improve health literacy and enhance patient-centered communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site. Literacy and Health Outcomes. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/litsum.htm. Accessed April 27, 2010.
Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res. 1996;9:139–143.
Alexander RE. Readability of published dental educational materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:937–942.
Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:199–204.
Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1027–1030.
Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:33–42.
Bass L. Health literacy: implications for teaching the adult patient. J Infus Nurs. 2005;28:15–22.
Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Munoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285:2612–2621.
Bill-Harvey D, Rippey R, Abeles M, Donald MJ, Downing D, Ingenito F, Pfeiffer CA. Outcome of an osteoarthritis education program for low-literacy patients taught by indigenous instructors. Patient Educ Couns. 1989;13:133–142.
Boulos MN. British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7:528–535.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Scientific and Technical Information Simply Put. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/DHDSP/cdcynergy_training/Content/activeinformation/resources/simpput.pdf. Accessed Dec 1, 2009.
Cooley ME, Moriarty H, Berger MS, Selm-Orr D, Coyle B, Short T. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995;22:1345–1351.
Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter-Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals. J Community Health. 2005;30:213–219.
Dale E, O’Rourke J. The Living Word Vocabulary: The Words We Know: A National Vocabulary Inventory Study. Elgin, IL: Dome Press; 1979.
D’Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West J. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:807–812.
Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–395.
Davis TC, Mayeaux EJ, Fredrickson D, Bocchini JA, Jr., Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics. 1994;93:460–468.
Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott; 1996.
DuBay W. The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information; 2004.
Fouad MN, Kiefe CI, Bartolucci AA, Burst NM, Ulene V, Harvey MR. A hypertension control program tailored to unskilled and minority workers. Ethn Dis. 1997;7:191–199.
Friedland R. Understanding Health Literacy: New Estimates of the Cost of Inadequate Health Literacy. Washington, DC: National Academy on an Aging Society; 1998.
Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33:352–373.
Hoffmann T, McKenna K. Analysis of stroke patients’ and carers’ reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:286–293.
Hussey LC. Minimizing effects of low literacy on medication knowledge and compliance among the elderly. Clin Nurs Res. 1994;3:132–145.
Ivnik M, Jett MY. Creating written patient education materials. Chest. 2008;133:1038–1040.
Jackson RH, Davis TC, Bairnsfather LE, George RB, Crouch MA, Gault H. Patient reading ability: an overlooked problem in health care. South Med J. 1991;84:1172–1175.
Johnson K, Weiss BD. How long does it take to assess literacy skills in clinical practice? J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:211–214.
Juzych MS, Randhawa S, Shukairy A, Kaushal P, Gupta A, Shalauta N. Functional health literacy in patients with glaucoma in urban settings. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:718–724.
Kemp EC, Floyd MR, McCord-Duncan E, Lang F. Patients prefer the method of “Tell Back-Collaborative Inquiry” to assess understanding of medical information. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:24–30.
Kripalani S, Bengtzen R, Henderson LE, Jacobson TA. Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB. 2008;30:13–19.
Ley P, Florio T. The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychol Health Med. 1996;1:7–28.
Lillington L, Royce J, Novak D, Ruvalcaba M, Chlebowski R. Evaluation of a smoking cessation program for pregnant minority women. Cancer Pract. 1995;3:157–163.
Mailloux SL, Johnson ME, Fisher DG, Pettibone TJ. How reliable is computerized assessment of readability? Comput Nurs. 1995;13:221–225.
McCray AT. Promoting health literacy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:152–163.
Meade CD, Byrd JC. Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:204–206.
Meade CD, Diekmann J, Thornhill DG. Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19:51–55.
Meade CD, Smith CF. Readability formulas: Cautions and criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17:153–158.
Mulrow C, Bailey S, Sonksen PH, Slavin B. Evaluation of an Audiovisual Diabetes Education Program: negative results of a randomized trial of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:215–219.
Murero M, D’Ancona G, Karamanoukian H. Use of the Internet by patients before and after cardiac surgery: telephone survey. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:E27.
National Cancer Institute. Clear & Simple: Developing Effective Print Materials for Low-literate Readers. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1994.
National Center for Education Statistics. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education; 1993.
National Center for Education Statistics. A First Look at the Literacy of America’s Adults in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education; 2006:28.
National Institutes of Health. How to Write Easy to Read Health Materials. National Library of Medicine Web site. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html. Accessed Feb 1, 2009.
Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2004.
Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:537–541.
Ryan JG, Leguen F, Weiss BD, Albury S, Jennings T, Velez F, Salibi N. Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice? Health Educ Res. 2008;23:603–611.
Sabharwal S, Badarudeen S, Unes Kunju S. Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1245–1250.
Vives M, Young L, Sabharwal S. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2826–2831.
Wallace LS, Turner LW, Ballard JE, Keenum AJ, Weiss BD. Evaluation of web-based osteoporosis educational materials. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14:936–945.
Wang SW, Capo JT, Orillaza N. Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1308–1315.
Weiss BD. Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, American Medical Foundation; 2003.
Weiss BD, Blanchard JS, McGee DL, Hart G, Warren B, Burgoon M, Smith KJ. Illiteracy among Medicaid recipients and its relationship to health care costs. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1994;5:99–111.
We thank Emily McClemens, PA-C, for her editorial assistance.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
This work was performed at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.
About this article
Cite this article
Badarudeen, S., Sabharwal, S. Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2572–2580 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y