Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cruciate-retaining TKA Using a Third-generation System with a Four-pegged Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-year Followup Note

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

A third-generation TKA system was designed to address problems encountered with earlier designs including a high rate of patellofemoral complications. At a minimum of 5 years, we previously reported survivorship of 98.7% using revision for any reason as the endpoint for a cohort that includes the patients described in this report. That cohort was unique in that a tibial component that uses four short pegs for fixation was used in a subset of patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA and the tibial and femoral components were precoated with polymethylmethacrylate.

Questions/purposes

We now report the survival rate, postoperative function, complications, radiographic loosening, and osteolysis at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients who underwent 179 TKAs. The patella was resurfaced in all cases and all components were cemented. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for evidence of component loosening and osteolysis. Forty of the 161 patients (with 44 TKAs) had died and eight patients (nine knees) were lost to followup. For the remaining 113 patients (126 knees), the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.7 years; range, 10.0–13.9 years).

Results

Survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening were 97.7% and 100%, respectively. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for postoperative arthrofibrosis. There were no reoperations for patellar component maltracking, wear or loosening, tibiofemoral polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or aseptic loosening. Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from a mean of 47.7 (range, 23–78) preoperatively to 85.4 (range, 33–100).

Conclusions

This cruciate-retaining design had a low risk of implant failure or revision and the design changes eliminated the patellar failures seen with earlier iterations at up to 10 years.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–F
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Felice R, Giron F. The Insall-Burstein total knee replacement in osteoarthritis: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:560–565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Barden RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1231–1236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Attar FG, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:344–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrington JW, Sah A, Malchau H, Burke DW. Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate: results at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:874–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertin KC. Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of pegged and stemmed designs. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:670–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berzins A, Jacobs JJ, Berger R, Ed C, Natarajan R, Andriacchi T, Galante JO. Surface damage in machined ram-extruded and net-shape molded retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1534–1540.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourne RB, Laskin RS, Guerin JS. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics. 2007;30(8 suppl):83–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chew JT, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:87–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiu YS, Chen WM, Huang CK, Chiang CC, Chen TH. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a NexGen posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1045–1049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Completo A, Fonseca F, Simões JA. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study. J Biomech. 2008;41:560–566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ewald, FC. The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faris PM, Keating EM, Farris A, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1204–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW, Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL. Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forster MC. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:265–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty:16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:210–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haman JD, Wimmer MA, Galante JO. Surface damage and wear in fixed, modular tibial inserts: the effects of conformity and constraint. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J, eds. Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Guide to Get Better Performance. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2005:85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754–765.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Insall J, Salvati E. Patella Position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101:101–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL. Comparison of two total knee prostheses on the incidence of patella clunk syndrome. Int Orthop. 2002;26:48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD004803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kavolus CH, Hummel MT, Barnett KP, Jennings JE Jr. Comparison of the Insall-Burstein II and NexGen Legacy total knee arthroplasty systems with respect to patella complications. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:822–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976–1992. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:375–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):150–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, Nazarian DG, Booth RE Jr. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop. 2007;36:550–553.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:107–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma HM, Lu YC, Kwok TG, Ho FY, Huang CY, Huang CH. The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:408–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mariconda M, Lotti G, Milano C. Fracture of posterior-stabilized tibial insert in a Genesis knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:529–530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller CW, Pettygrow R. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of a pegged tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:70–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Misra AN, Hussain MR, Fiddian NJ, Newton G. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:389–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Most E, Zayontz S, Li G, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:101–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003;20:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ong A, Wong KL, Lai M, Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:786–792.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1362–1371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parsch D, Krüger M, Moser MT, Geiger F. Follow-up of 11–16 years after modular fixed-bearing TKA. Int Orthop. 2009;33:431–435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Peters CL, Craig MA, Mohr RA, Bachus KN. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;409:158–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:51–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975–1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW Jr. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty: fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R, Galante JO. Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:106–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saleh KJ, Mulhall K, Hofmann A, Bolognesi M, Laskin R. Primary total knee arthroplasty outcomes. In: Barrack R, Booth R, Lonner J, McCarthy J, Mont M, Rubash H, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction 3. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2006:93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sorger JI, Federle D, Kirk PG, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:869–879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sylvain GM, Kassab S, Coutts R, Santore R. Early failure of a roughened surface, precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:141–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:813–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Thadani PJ, Vince KG, Ortaaslan SG, Blackburn DC, Cudiamat CV. Ten- to 12-year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:17–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. van Lenthe GH, Willems MM, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:630–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wright RJ, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA. Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2464–2470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Peggy Arp, Reggie Barden, Laura Quigley, and Nicholas Ting for assistance with preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig J. Della Valle MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors (CDV, AGR, JJJ, RAB, JOG) have received consulting fees, royalties, and/or research funding from Zimmer, Inc (Warsaw, IN). The institution of one or more of the authors (CDV, AGR, JJJ, RAB, JOG) has received funding from Zimmer, Inc.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, A.J., Della Valle, C.J., Rosenberg, A.G. et al. Cruciate-retaining TKA Using a Third-generation System with a Four-pegged Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-year Followup Note. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2160–2167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1360-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1360-2

Keywords

Navigation