Abstract
Background
A third-generation TKA system was designed to address problems encountered with earlier designs including a high rate of patellofemoral complications. At a minimum of 5 years, we previously reported survivorship of 98.7% using revision for any reason as the endpoint for a cohort that includes the patients described in this report. That cohort was unique in that a tibial component that uses four short pegs for fixation was used in a subset of patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA and the tibial and femoral components were precoated with polymethylmethacrylate.
Questions/purposes
We now report the survival rate, postoperative function, complications, radiographic loosening, and osteolysis at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients who underwent 179 TKAs. The patella was resurfaced in all cases and all components were cemented. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for evidence of component loosening and osteolysis. Forty of the 161 patients (with 44 TKAs) had died and eight patients (nine knees) were lost to followup. For the remaining 113 patients (126 knees), the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.7 years; range, 10.0–13.9 years).
Results
Survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening were 97.7% and 100%, respectively. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for postoperative arthrofibrosis. There were no reoperations for patellar component maltracking, wear or loosening, tibiofemoral polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or aseptic loosening. Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from a mean of 47.7 (range, 23–78) preoperatively to 85.4 (range, 33–100).
Conclusions
This cruciate-retaining design had a low risk of implant failure or revision and the design changes eliminated the patellar failures seen with earlier iterations at up to 10 years.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Felice R, Giron F. The Insall-Burstein total knee replacement in osteoarthritis: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:560–565.
Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Barden RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1231–1236.
Attar FG, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:344–349.
Barrington JW, Sah A, Malchau H, Burke DW. Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate: results at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:874–878.
Bertin KC. Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of pegged and stemmed designs. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:670–678.
Berzins A, Jacobs JJ, Berger R, Ed C, Natarajan R, Andriacchi T, Galante JO. Surface damage in machined ram-extruded and net-shape molded retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1534–1540.
Bourne RB, Laskin RS, Guerin JS. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics. 2007;30(8 suppl):83–85.
Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117–124.
Chew JT, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:87–98.
Chiu YS, Chen WM, Huang CK, Chiang CC, Chen TH. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a NexGen posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1045–1049.
Completo A, Fonseca F, Simões JA. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study. J Biomech. 2008;41:560–566.
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:47–57.
Ewald, FC. The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.
Faris PM, Keating EM, Farris A, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1204–1209.
Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW, Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL. Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:40–50.
Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79–86.
Forster MC. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:265–270.
Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty:16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:210–215.
Haman JD, Wimmer MA, Galante JO. Surface damage and wear in fixed, modular tibial inserts: the effects of conformity and constraint. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J, eds. Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Guide to Get Better Performance. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2005:85–90.
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754–765.
Insall J, Salvati E. Patella Position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101:101–104.
Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL. Comparison of two total knee prostheses on the incidence of patella clunk syndrome. Int Orthop. 2002;26:48–51.
Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD004803.
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.
Kavolus CH, Hummel MT, Barnett KP, Jennings JE Jr. Comparison of the Insall-Burstein II and NexGen Legacy total knee arthroplasty systems with respect to patella complications. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:822–825.
Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976–1992. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:375–386.
Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):150–156.
Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, Nazarian DG, Booth RE Jr. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop. 2007;36:550–553.
Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:107–111.
Ma HM, Lu YC, Kwok TG, Ho FY, Huang CY, Huang CH. The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:408–412.
Mariconda M, Lotti G, Milano C. Fracture of posterior-stabilized tibial insert in a Genesis knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:529–530.
Miller CW, Pettygrow R. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of a pegged tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:70–75.
Misra AN, Hussain MR, Fiddian NJ, Newton G. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:389–392.
Most E, Zayontz S, Li G, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:101–113.
NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003;20:1–3.
Ong A, Wong KL, Lai M, Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:786–792.
O’Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1362–1371.
Parsch D, Krüger M, Moser MT, Geiger F. Follow-up of 11–16 years after modular fixed-bearing TKA. Int Orthop. 2009;33:431–435.
Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18–25.
Peters CL, Craig MA, Mohr RA, Bachus KN. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;409:158–168.
Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:51–57.
Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975–1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503–513.
Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW Jr. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty: fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:89–95.
Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10–17.
Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R, Galante JO. Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:106–114.
Saleh KJ, Mulhall K, Hofmann A, Bolognesi M, Laskin R. Primary total knee arthroplasty outcomes. In: Barrack R, Booth R, Lonner J, McCarthy J, Mont M, Rubash H, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction 3. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2006:93–110.
Sorger JI, Federle D, Kirk PG, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:869–879.
Sylvain GM, Kassab S, Coutts R, Santore R. Early failure of a roughened surface, precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:141–148.
Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:813–819.
Thadani PJ, Vince KG, Ortaaslan SG, Blackburn DC, Cudiamat CV. Ten- to 12-year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:17–29.
van Lenthe GH, Willems MM, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:630–637.
Wright RJ, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA. Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2464–2470.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Peggy Arp, Reggie Barden, Laura Quigley, and Nicholas Ting for assistance with preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
One or more of the authors (CDV, AGR, JJJ, RAB, JOG) have received consulting fees, royalties, and/or research funding from Zimmer, Inc (Warsaw, IN). The institution of one or more of the authors (CDV, AGR, JJJ, RAB, JOG) has received funding from Zimmer, Inc.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, A.J., Della Valle, C.J., Rosenberg, A.G. et al. Cruciate-retaining TKA Using a Third-generation System with a Four-pegged Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-year Followup Note. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2160–2167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1360-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1360-2