Abstract
Background
Hospital care of patients with hip fractures often is managed primarily by either a medicine or orthopaedic service, depending on the institution. Whether complication rates, length of stay, or time to surgery differs on different services is unknown.
Questions/purposes
We therefore determined whether (1) perioperative complication rates, and (2) length of stay and time to surgery for patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures differed by the specialty of the primary service.
Patients and Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study at a university-based academic hospital of patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture admitted to medicine and orthopaedic services during 2006. Of the 98 patients included in the analysis, 34% were managed by a medicine service and 66% by orthopaedics. Using multivariable regression models to adjust for patient characteristics and comorbidities, we determined whether service designation predicted the likelihood of severe or intermediate perioperative complications, length of stay, or time to surgery.
Results
The rate of severe or intermediate complications for patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures was 30%. Patients with medicine or orthopaedic services did not differ in the rate of severe or intermediate complications or length of stay in adjusted analysis. However, time to surgery was longer in patients managed by the medical service in adjusted analysis.
Conclusions
In our patient cohort, the likelihood of perioperative complications occurring among patients with hip fractures did not differ by service designation in adjusted analysis.
Level of Evidence
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Trends in Hospital Risk-Adjusted Mortality for Select Diagnoses and Procedures, 1994–2004. HCUP Statistical Brief #38. Rockville, MD; 2007.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Common Injuries That Result in Hospitalization, 2004. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb19.jsp. Accessed July 28, 2008.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. One in Three Hip Fracture Patients Has Hip Replacement Surgery. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/news/nn/nn010406.htm. Accessed July 29, 2008.
Bacon WE. Secular trends in hip fracture occurrence and survival: age and sex differences. J Aging Health. 1996;8:538–533.
Batsis JA, Phy MP, Melton LJ, Schleck CD, Larson DR, Huddleston PM, Huddleston JM. Effects of a hospitalist care model on mortality of elderly patients with hip fractures. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:219–225.
Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:364–370.
Fierro MP. Trends Alert—Costs of Chronic Diseases: What Are States Facing? The Council of State Governments. Available at: http://www.csg.org. Accessed November 16, 2009.
Huddleston JM, Long KH, Naessens JM, Vanness D, Larson D, Trousdale R, Plevak M, Cabanela M, Ilstrup D, Wachter RM. Medical and surgical comanagement after elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:28–38.
Phy MP, Vanness DJ, Melton LJ, Long KH, Schleck CD, Larson DR, Huddleston PM, Huddleston JM. Effects of a hospitalist model on elderly patients with hip fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:796–801.
United States Census Bureau. Available at: www.census.gov. Accessed November 16, 2009.
US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Hip Fracture Outcomes in People Age 50 and Over—Background Paper, OTA-BP-H-120. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; July 1994.
Vidan M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J. Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1476–1482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
This work was performed at Penn State College of Medicine/Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
About this article
Cite this article
Chuang, C.H., Pinkowsky, G.J., Hollenbeak, C.S. et al. Medicine versus Orthopaedic Service for Hospital Management of Hip Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2218–2223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1290-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1290-z