Abstract
Background
The Program Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) continually tries to improve the quality of the scientific program at AAOS meetings. However, according to the most recent study, the publication rate of papers presented at the 1996 annual meeting was only 34%.
Questions/purposes
To quantify the effects of these measures, we determined the 5-year publication rates in peer-reviewed journals of papers presented at the 2001 AAOS annual meeting.
Methods
Using the same methods described by Bhandari et al., we performed a comprehensive search of Medline and PubMed for subsequent publications of podium and poster presentations.
Results
The publication rates for all presentations were 49% at 5 years with poster and podium presentations at 47% and 52%, respectively. Among subspecialty divisions, the highest rate of publication was the sports medicine and arthroscopy category with 58% and the lowest was in the rehabilitative medicine category with 21%.
Conclusions
Less than 50% of abstracts presented at the 2001 AAOS annual meeting were published in the peer-reviewed literature at 5 years. As many studies presented will not pass the scrutiny of peer review, the information presented at the AAOS annual meeting should not be used as the sole guide to clinic practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:615–621.
Brown CM. The benefits of searching EMBASE versus Medline for pharmaceutical information. Online Information Review. 1998;22:3–8.
DeMola PM, Hill DL, Rogers K, Abboud JA. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1629–1633.
Elder NC, Blake RL Jr. Publication patterns of presentations at the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine and North American Primary Care Research Group annual meetings. Fam Med. 1994;26:352–355.
Gavazza JB, Foulkes GD, Meals RA. Publication patterns of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand annual meeting. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:742–745.
Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA. Publication patterns of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1138–1143.
EMBASE. Available at: http://www.info.embase.com/about/what.shtml. Accessed October 4, 2009.
Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual Musculoskeletal Tumor Society meetings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:98–103.
McDonald S, Taylor L, Adams C. Searching the right database: a comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Lib Rev. 1999;16:151–156.
Murrey DB, Wright RW, Seiler JG III, Day TE, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 annual Academy meeting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;359:247–253.
PubMed. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/. Accessed October 4, 2009.
Riordan FA. Do presenters to pediatric meetings get their work published? Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:524–526.
Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented in the Otorhinolarygological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26:253–256.
Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272:158–162.
Slobogean GP, Verma A, Giustini D, Slobogean BL, Mulpuri K. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 11. [Epub ahead of print]
Whitehouse MR, Atwal NS, Blom AW. Publication rates for hip surgery-related abstracts presented at national and international meetings. Orthopedics. 2009;32:407.
Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:848–849.
Acknowledgments
We thank Keith Baldwin, MD, MSPT, MPH, for work with the statistical analysis of our data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
About this article
Cite this article
Donegan, D.J., Kim, T.W. & Lee, GC. Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 1428–1435 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1171-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1171-5