Skip to main content


Log in

Pedobarographic Analysis Following Ponseti Treatment for Congenital Clubfoot

  • Symposium: Clubfoot: Etiology and Treatment
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research


Current methods of treating congenital clubfeet provide high rates of functional outcomes. Despite the clinical outcomes, radiographic assessment suggests residual equinus deformity of the hindfoot. It is unclear whether these deformities result in abnormal foot-floor pressures and whether they correlate with clinical outcome. We evaluated 28 feet in 20 patients following Ponseti treatment for clubfoot by clinical and pedobarographic examination a mean of 33 months after removal of the last cast. The data were compared to age- and weight-matched normal subjects and to the unaffected foot in the unilaterally affected patients. Despite ankle range of motion of 30° and a physiologic hindfoot valgus alignment in 19 cases, pedobarography suggested differences in maximum force, impulse, contact area, and peak pressure compared to normal subjects. Compared to the unaffected foot the only difference was reduced peak pressure over the medial hindfoot and forefoot with increased pressure over the lateral midfoot. Similar to radiographic abnormalities in studies on treated clubfeet with good functional outcome, pedobarographic analyses show differences compared to a control group. The value of pedobarographic analysis for predicting successful treatment of congenital clubfoot is questionable since it does not correlate with the clinical outcome in patients treated with the Ponseti method.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Abdelgawad AA, Lehman WB, van Bosse HJ, Scher DM, Sala DA. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:98–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronson J, Puskarich CL. Deformity and disability from treated clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:109–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch K, Gerss J, Rosenbaum D. Preliminary normative values for foot loading parameters of the developing child. Gait Posture. 2007;26:238–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM, Iiboshi A. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:262–276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1477–1489.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon SJ. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes. Ergonomics. 2008;51:1503–1514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Hawary R, Karol LA, Jeans KA, Richards BS. Gait analysis of children treated for clubfoot with physical therapy or the Ponseti cast technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1508–1516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Favre P, Exner GU, Drerup B, Schmid D, Wetz HH, Jacob HA. The contralateral foot in children with unilateral clubfoot: a study of pressures and forces involved in gait. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:54–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:323–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:487–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hee HT, Lee EH, Lee GS. Gait and pedobarographic patterns of surgically treated clubfeet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;40:287–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hennig EM, Staats A, Rosenbaum D. Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:517–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes J, Pratt L, Linge K, Clark P, Klenerman L. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech. 1991;6:14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1286–1294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:23–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maton B, Wicart P. Centrally adaptations in unilateral idiopathic clubfoot children following conservative treatment. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15:72–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morag E, Cavanagh PR. Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. J Biomech. 1999;32:359–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morcuende JA. Congenital idiopathic clubfoot: prevention of late deformity and disability by conservative treatment with the Ponseti technique. Pediatr Ann. 2006;35:128–30, 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morcuende JA, Abbasi D, Dolan LA, Ponseti IV. Results of an accelerated Ponseti protocol for clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:623–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113:376–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ponseti IV, El-Khoury GY, Ippolito E, Weinstein SL. A radiographic study of skeletal deformities in treated clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;30–42.

  23. Radler C, Manner HM, Suda R, Burghardt R, Herzenberg JE, Ganger R, Grill F. Radiographic evaluation of idiopathic clubfeet undergoing Ponseti treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1177–1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thacker MM, Scher DM, Sala DA, van Bosse HJ, Feldman DS, Lehman WB. Use of the foot abduction orthosis following Ponseti casts: is it essential? J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:225–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wearing S, Urry S, Smeathers J. The effect of visual targeting on ground reaction force and temporospatial parameters of gait. Clin Biomech. 2000;15:583–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Widhe T, Berggren L. Gait analysis and dynamic foot pressure in the assessment of treated clubfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:186–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc F. Sinclair MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has waived or does not require approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Sinclair, M.F., Bosch, K., Rosenbaum, D. et al. Pedobarographic Analysis Following Ponseti Treatment for Congenital Clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 1223–1230 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: