Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Arthroscopy in Evaluation of Painful Hip Arthroplasty

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

Unexplained pain after hip arthroplasty is frustrating for patients and surgeons. We describe the use of hip arthroscopy in management of the painful hip arthroplasty, critically evaluate the outcomes of these patients, and refine indications for hip arthroscopy in this setting. We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients (16 hips) who underwent hip arthroscopy after joint replacement. One patient had suspected septic arthritis despite negative aspiration and one had known septic arthritis but was not a candidate for open arthrotomy; two had intraarticular migration of hardware. The remaining 10 patients (11 hips) had persistent pain despite negative diagnostic studies. The two patients (two hips) with infection were successfully treated with arthroscopic lavage and débridement plus intravenous antibiotics. Intraarticular metal fragments and a loose acetabular screw were successfully removed in two patients (three hips). Findings in the remaining 11 hips included a loose acetabular component (one); corrosion at the head-neck junction of a metal-on-metal articulation (one); soft tissue-scar impingement at the head/cup interface (four); synovitis with associated scar tissue (four); and capsular scarring with adhesions (one). Arthroscopy represented a successful treatment or directly led to a successful treatment in 12 of 16 hips. We observed no complications as a result of the arthroscopy. Arthroscopy may be of value in selected patients undergoing hip arthroplasty with unexplained pain after an inconclusive standard workup.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bocell JR, Thorpe CD, Tullos HS. Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:125–134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozic KJ, Rubash HE. The painful total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fontana A, Zecca M, Sala C. Arthroscopic assessment of total hip replacement and polyethylene wear: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:244–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyman JL, Salvati EA, Laurencin CT, Rogers DE, Maynard M, Brause DB. The arthroscopic drainage, irrigation, and debridement of late, acute total hip arthroplasty infections: average 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:903–910.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson DR, Friedman RJ, McGinty JB, Mason JL, St Mary EW. The role of arthroscopy in the problem total knee replacement. Arthroscopy. 1990;6:30–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanduja V, Villar RN. The role of arthroscopy in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence SJ, Kan RO. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions after New Jersey LCS total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1992;15:943–944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas TS, DeLuca PF, Nazarian DG, Bartolozzi AR, Booth RE Jr. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar clunk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:226–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luchetti WT, Copley LA, Vresilovic EJ, Black J, Steinberg ME. Drain entrapment and titanium to ceramic head deposition: two unique complications following closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:713–717.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mah ET, Bradley CM. Arthroscopic removal of acrylic cement from unreduced hip prosthesis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62:508–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Markel DC, Luessenhop CP, Windsor RE, Sculco TA. Arthroscopic treatment of peripatellar fibrosis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:293–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy JC, Busconi B. The role of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of hip disease. Orthopedics. 1995;18:753–756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nordt W, Giangarra CE, Levy IM, Habermann ET. Arthroscopic removal of entrapped debris following dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty. Arthroscopy. 1987;3:196–198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robbins GM, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:86–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scranton PE Jr. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:428–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shifrin LZ, Reis ND. Arthroscopy of a dislocated hip replacement: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;146:213–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tzagarakis GP, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kaseta MA, Vlamis JA, Makestas MA, Nikolopoulos KE. The role of arthroscopic intervention for symptomatic total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2001;24:1090–1095; quiz 1096–1097.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vernace JV, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA. Arthroscopic management of the patellar clunk syndrome following posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:179–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wasilewski SA, Frankl U. Arthroscopy of the painful dysfunctional total knee replacement. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:294–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wasilewski SA, Frankl U. Fracture of polyethylene of patellar component in total knee arthroplasty, diagnosed by arthroscopy. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4(Suppl):S19–S22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph C. McCarthy MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, J.C., Jibodh, S.R. & Lee, JA. The Role of Arthroscopy in Evaluation of Painful Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 174–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0525-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0525-8

Keywords

Navigation