Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of Silicone Sheets on Microvascular Anastomosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

The use of silicone products combined with free flap transfer is well established in reconstructive surgery. We determined the risk of thrombosis as a result of direct contact between the silicone sheet and the point of microanastomosis. We performed microvascular surgery in 24 female Chinchilla Bastard rabbits weighing 3500 to 4000 g using two groups: Group 1 (n = 12), microanastomosis directly in contact with silicone sheets; and Group 2 (n = 12), microanastomosis protected by a 2 × 3 × 1-cm muscle cuff before being placed in contact with the silicone. We assessed flow-through of the microanastomosis by selective microangiography and histology at 1 and 3 weeks. All microanastomoses in Group 1 were occluded by postoperative thromboses, whereas all microanastomoses in Group 2 had adequate flow-through. Histologic analysis revealed thromboses in Group 1 formed from collagenous bundles of fiber securely attached to the intraluminal wall of the vessel. Three weeks after the procedure, these thromboses were canalized by varying small vessels. In Group 2, a slight luminal stenosis with evidence of infiltration of inflammatory cells at the microanastomosis line was observed histologically in all cases. Prefabricated flaps using silicone sheets and muscular cuffs placed around the anastomoses appear to reduce the risk of thrombosis and enhance neovascularization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–D
Fig. 5A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhathena HM, Kavarana NM. Primary reconstruction of mandible in head and neck cancer with silastic implant: a review of 69 cases. Acta Chir Plast. 1998;40:31–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biemer E. [Indications and limits of replantation][in German]. Chirurg. 1990;61:103–108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Braley SA. The use of silicones in plastic surgery: a retrospective view. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:280–288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burget GC, Walton RL. Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1171–1207; discussion 1208–1216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Erol OO. The transformation of a free skin graft into a vascularized pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:470–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fayad J, Kuriloff DB. Prefabricated microvascular autograft in tracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111:396–406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayou RM. A histological comparison of contracted and non-contracted capsules around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:700–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Germann G, Pelzer M, Sauerbier M. [Prefabricated flaps, a new reconstructive concept][in German]. Orthopäde. 1998;27:451–456.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell G. Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with silicone-gel and saline-filled implants: a 6 year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:373–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoang NT, Kloeppel M, Staudenmaier R, Werner J, Biemer E. Prefabrication of large fasciocutaneous flaps using an isolated arterialised vein as implanted vascular pedicle. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:632–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoang NT, Kloeppel M, Werner J, Staudenmaier R, Biemer E. Proposed new method for angiographically quantifying neovascularization in prefabricated flaps. Microsurgery. 2005;25:220–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman SA. A silicone template to facilitate cartilage grafting in the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:168–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong JP, Lee HB, Chung YK, Kim SW, Tark KC. Coverage of difficult wounds around the knee joint with prefabricated, distally based sartorius muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:484–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson DA, Lazarus D, Silfen R. The use of serial tissue expansion in pediatric plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;45:589–593; discussion 593–594.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh Y. An experimental study of prefabricated flaps using silicone sheets, with reference to the vascular patternization process. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28:140–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Itoh Y, Arai K. Nasal reconstruction with a thin, free flap prefabricated with a silicone sheet: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;8:359–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Itoh Y, Arai K. A deep inferior epigastric flap with a prefabricated thin portion obtained from the insertion of a silicone sheet. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:204–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marble HB Jr, Alexander JM. A precise technique for restoration of bony facial contour deficiencies with silicone rubber implants: report of cases. J Oral Surg. 1972;30:737–742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison WA, Penington AJ, Kumta SK, Callan P. Clinical applications and technical limitations of prefabricated flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:378–385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mustoe TA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:82–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen TH, Kloeppel M, Staudenmaier R, Werner J, Biemer E. Study of the neovascularisation process of prefabrication of flaps using a silicone sheet and an isolated arterial pedicle: experimental study in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39:326–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishijima N, Matsumoto T, Yamamuro T. Two-stage reconstruction for the hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20:415–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pribaz JJ, Fine N, Orgill DP. Flap prefabrication in the head and neck: a 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:808–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pribaz JJ, Maitz PK, Fine NA. Flap prefabrication using the “vascular crane” principle: an experimental study and clinical application. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47:250–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shipkov Kh, Anastasov Iu, Mikhailov T. [Surgical reconstruction options in Poland’s syndrome][in Bulgarian]. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2000;56:26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stern PJ, Amin AK, Neale HW. Early joint and tendon reconstruction for a degloving injury to the dorsum of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:391–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Takato T, Zuker RM, Turley CB. Prefabrication of skin flaps using vein grafts: an experimental study in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:593–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. The Hoang N, Kloeppel M, Staudenmaier R, Schweinbeck S, Biemer E. Neovascularization in prefabricated flaps using a tissue expander and an implanted arteriovenous pedicle. Microsurgery. 2005;25:213–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomson HG. The fate of the pseudosheath pocket around silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:667–671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vistnes LM, Ksander GA, Kosek J. Study of encapsulation of silicone rubber implants in animals: a foreign-body reaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62:580–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner H, Beller FK, Pfautsch M. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Youm T, Magiotta M, Kasabian A, Karp N. Complications of tissue expansion in a public hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:396–401; discussion 401–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany (AvH Foundation) for help in financing the first author’s research scholarship at the University Hospital “rechts der Isar” in Munich, Germany, and for their scientific advice and expertise in making this publication possible. We also thank Christine Cavanna at the University of Regensburg Medical Center for careful editing of the manuscript, and Drs. M. Wenzel, A. Feucht, K. Herfeldt, and O. Petrowicz, Institute for Experimental Surgery of the University Hospital rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich, Germany, for help with statistical analysis and advice in performing the histologic images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to The Hoang Nguyen MD, PhD.

Additional information

One author (CH) has received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the animal protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Hoang Nguyen, T., Kloeppel, M., Hoehnke, C. et al. Influence of Silicone Sheets on Microvascular Anastomosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 3123–3129 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0388-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0388-z

Keywords

Navigation