Abstract
Moving from traditional batch production into in-line or continuous coatings production requires accurate on-line quality control instruments. The aim of the present work was to investigate the principle of non-Newtonian capillary rheometry for quality control purposes. In the investigation, three series of acrylic-based viscoelastic coating samples with different types and concentrations of pigments and thickening agents were used, and the rheological measurements were compared to results obtained with the so-called Stormer viscometer and an advanced off-line rheometer. A detailed analysis of the potential measurement implications was also conducted. For shear stresses from 15.0 to 350.0 Pa (the upper boundary), the novel capillary rheometer was found to provide results in good quantitative agreement with the advanced rheometer when sample holding time, and thereby shear history, was properly controlled. At a shear stress between 1.0 Pa (lower boundary) and 15.0 Pa, the agreement was not as good, with a difference in results of the non-Newtonian capillary rheometer and the advanced rheometer between 15% and 74%. The resolution of the capillary rheometer was sufficiently high to allow detection of the rheology changes associated with variations in coating formulations of pigment volume and rheology modifier concentrations. In summary, for fast on-line evaluation of coating rheology, the principle of capillarity has been demonstrated to be a varied and robust technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- D :
-
Diameter of the capillary tube (m)
- f s :
-
Moody friction factor of the fluid in a straight pipe
- k b :
-
Bend loss coefficient
- L :
-
Length of the capillary tube (m)
- Q :
-
Flow rate of the sample (m3/s)
- R :
-
Radius of the capillary tube (m)
- R b :
-
Radius of the bend (m)
- u :
-
Velocity of the fluid (m/s)
- ΔP :
-
Total pressure drop caused by the friction in the capillary tube (Pa)
- ΔP f,y :
-
Pressure drop to overcome the yield stress (Pa)
- ΔP bend :
-
Total pressure drop inside a bend (Pa)
- ΔP f,bend :
-
Pressure drop caused by the friction inside a bend (Pa)
- ΔP add :
-
Additional pressure drop generated by the change of direction of the fluid inside a bend (Pa)
- α :
-
Calculated ratio between the viscosity results measured by the non-Newtonian capillary or the advanced rheometer and the Stormer viscometer
- β :
-
Calculated ratio value between the results of the non-Newtonian capillary rheometer with and without a holding time and the advanced rheometer
- η :
-
Viscosity of the fluid (Pa·s)
- θ :
-
Angle of the bend (°)
- \(\mathop {\gamma_{\text{a}} }\limits^{ \cdot }\) :
-
Apparent shear rate applied to the measured sample (s−1)
- \(\mathop {\gamma_{\text{w}} }\limits^{ \cdot }\) :
-
Shear rate at the tube wall (s−1)
- λ :
-
Reduced PVC value (PVC/CPVC)
- ρ :
-
Density of the fluid (kg/m3)
- τ w :
-
Shear stress at the tube wall (Pa)
References
Gérardy, R, Emmanuel, N, Toupy, T, Kassin, VE, Tshibalonza, NN, Schmitz, M, Monbaliu, JCM, “Continuous Flow Organic Chemistry: Successes and Pitfalls at the Interface with Current Societal Challenges.” Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2018 (20–21) 2301–2351 (2018)
Cervera-Padrell, AE, Skovby, T, Kiil, S, Gani, R, Gernaey, KV, “Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Production Involving Continuous Processes–A Process System Engineering (PSE)-Assisted Design Framework.” Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 82 (2) 437–456 (2012)
May, SA, “Flow Chemistry, Continuous Processing, and Continuous Manufacturing: A Pharmaceutical Perspective.” J. Flow Chem., 7 (3–4) 137–145 (2017)
Malhotra, G, “Pharmaceutical Processing—Batch or a Continuous Process: A Choice.” Pharm Process, 16–17 (2009)
Partovi, FY, “An Analytical Model of Process Choice in the Chemical Industry.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 105 (1) 213–227 (2007)
Hans-Joachim, S, Goldschmidt, A, BASF Handbook Basics of Coating Technology. European Coatings, Hannover (2018)
Wicks, ZW, Jones, FN, Pappas, SP, Douglas, AW, Organic Coatings: Science and Technology, 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
Schmollgruber, F, Choosing the Right Spectrophotometer. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/100526-choosing-the-right-spectrophotometer Accessed 28 May 2020 (2015)
Page, T, Dubina, H, Fillipi, G, Guidat, R, Patnaik, S, Poechlauer, JC, “Equipment and Analytical Companies Meeting Continuous Challenges. May 20–21, 2014 Continuous Manufacturing Symposium.” J. Pharm. Sci., 104 (3) 821–831 (2015)
Lane, JL, Henderson, KO, “Viscosity Measurement: So Easy, yet So Difficult.” ASTM Stand. News, 32(6) (2004)
Gulrajani, ML, Colour Measurement: Principles, Advances and Industrial Applications. Elsevier, New York (2010)
Tracton, AA, Coatings Technology Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
Lee, SL, O’Connor, TF, Yang, X, Cruz, CN, “Modernizing Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: from Batch to Continuous Production.” J. Pharm. Innov., 10 (3) 191–199 (2015)
Gupta, SV, “Commercial Viscometers.” In Viscometry for Liquids. Springer, Berlin (2014)
Liptak, BG, Instrument Engineers’ Handbook Process Measurement and Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)
Durdag, K, On-Line Viscosity Measurement. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/94508-on-line-viscosity-measurement Accessed 28 Jan 2020 (2006)
New REL KR140 Viscometer https://www.khushbooscientific.com/website/Cone-Plate-Viscometers-Rheometers.htm Accessed 01 May 2020
HAAKE™ Falling Ball Viscometer C https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/3560001?SID=srch-srp-3560001#/3560001?SID=srch-srp-3560001 Accessed 01 May 2020
Hammers S (2009) KROHNE OPTISONIC 6300. https://www.fagerberg.dk/Produkter/KrohneOptisonic-6300 Accessed 01 May 2020
Electromagnetic Viscometer (EV 1000) https://www.vinci-technologies.com/products-explo.aspx?IDM=601176&IDR=82291&IDR2=82560 Accessed 03 May 2020
University of Toronto (2010) AR2000 Rheometer http://www2.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/rheology/instrumentation.html Accessed 03 May 2020
Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc (1998) Brookfield Digital Rheometer Model DV-III + Operating Instructions Manual. http://www.laier.be/files/brookfield_operating_instructions_dv_3_ultra.pdf Accessed 24 May 2020
Cho, YI, Hartnett, JP, Lee, WY, “Non-Newtonian Viscosity Measurements in the Intermediate Shear Rate Range with the Falling-Ball Viscometer.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 15 (1) 61–74 (1984)
Rabani, A, Pinfield, VJ, Richard, EC, “Rate of Shear of an Ultrasonic Oscillating Rod Viscosity Probe.” Ultrasonics, 65 18–22 (2016)
Zhao, H, Memon, A, Gao, J, Taylor, SD, Sieben, D, Ratulowski, J, “Heavy Oil Viscosity Measurements: Best Practices and Guidelines.” Energy Fuels, 30 (7) 5277–5290 (2016)
Dao, TT, Ye, AX, Shaito, AA, Roye, N, Hedman, K, “Capillary Rheometry: Analysis of Low-Viscosity Fluids, and Viscous Liquids and Melts at High Shear Rates.” Am. Lab., 41 14 (2009)
Barel, AO, Paye, M, Maibach, HI, Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)
Abbas, KA, Abdulkarim, SM, Saleh, AM, Ebrahimian, M, “Suitability of Viscosity Measurement Methods for Liquid Food Variety and Applicability in Food Industry-A Review.” J. Food Agric. Environ., 8 (3) 100–107 (2010)
Patton, Temple C, “Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion.” In: Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion, pp. 479–479 (1964)
Mert, B, Sumali, H, Campanella, OH, “A New Method to Measure Viscosity and Intrinsic Sound Velocity of Liquids Using Impedance Tube Principles at Sonic Frequencies.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (8) 2613–2619 (2004)
Schirru, M, Development of an Ultrasonic Sensing Technique to Measure Lubricant Viscosity in Engine Journal Bearing In-Situ. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Durdag, K, “Solid State Acoustic Wave Sensors for Real-Time In-line Measurement of Oil Viscosity.” Sens. Rev., 28 (1) 68–73 (2008)
Turpeinen, T, Jäsberg, A, Haavisto, S, Liukkonen, J, Salmela, J, Koponen, AI, “Pipe Rheology of Microfibrillated Cellulose Suspensions.” Cellulose, 27 (1) 141–156 (2020)
Mezger, T, The Rheology Handbook, 3rd ed. Vincentz Network, Hannover (2011)
Kalotay, P, “On-line Viscosity Measurement Using Coriolis Mass Flowmeters.” Flow Meas. Instrum., 5 (4) 303–308 (1994)
Kim, BJ, Lee, SY, Jee, S, Atajanov, A, Yang, S, “Micro-Viscometer for Measuring Shear-Varying Blood Viscosity Over a Wide-Ranging Shear Rate.” Sensors, 17 (6) 1442 (2017)
Mason, WP, Baker, WO, McSkimin, HJ, Heiss, JH, “Measurement of Shear Elasticity and Viscosity of Liquids at Ultrasonic Frequencies.” Phys. Rev., 75 (6) 936 (1949)
Hertz, TG, Dymling, SO, Lindström, K, Persson, HW, “Viscosity Measurement of an Enclosed Liquid Using Ultrasound.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 62 (2) 457–462 (1991)
Shiokawa, S, Kondoh, J, “Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors.” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 43 2799–2802 (2004)
Joshi, SG, “Flow Sensor using Surface Acoustic Waves.” In: Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 555–558 (1988)
Wiklund, J, Shahram, I, Stading, M, “Methodology for In-line Rheology by Ultrasound Doppler Velocity Profiling- and Pressure Difference Techniques.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62 4277–4293 (2007)
Jørgensen, SB, “Quality Control for Efficient In-line Coating Production.” Technical University of Denmark, Master’s Thesis (2018)
Digilov, RM, “Pressure-Driven Capillary Viscometer: Fundamental Challenges in Transient Flow Viscometry.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 82 (12) 125111 (2011)
Jones, FN, Nichols, ME, Pappas, SP, Organic Coatings: Science and Technology. 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken (2017)
Kim, S, Cho, YI, Kensey, KR, Pellizzari, RO, Stark, PR, “A Scanning Dual-Capillary-Tube Viscometer.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71 (8) 3188–3192 (2000)
Lambourne, R, Strivens, TA, Paint and Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice. Elsevier, New York (1999)
Mooney, M, “Explicit Formulas for Slip and Fluidity.” J. Rheol. (1929–1932), 2 (2) 210–222 (1931)
Zhang, X, Fundamentals of Fiber Science. DEStech Publications, Lancaster (2014)
Schramm, G, A Practical Approach to Rheology and Rheometry. Gebrueder HAAKE GmbH, Karlsruhe (1994)
McCabe, WL, Julian, CS, Peter, H, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York (2004)
Escudier, MP, Gouldson, IW, Pereira, AS, Pinho, FT, Poole, RJ, “On the Reproducibility of the Rheology of Shear-Thinning Liquids.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 97 (2–3) 99–124 (2001)
“Rheology and Viscosity Measurements: Their Relation to the Properties of Water-based Coatings.” Pigment Resin Technol. 23(3) 11–13 (1994)
Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology in the Protective and Decorative Coatings Industry.” Rheol. Rev., 2005 173 (2005)
Brookfield KU-2 Viscometer Operating Instructions. Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, INC, Middleboro (2004)
Bird, RB, Stewart, WE, Lightfoot, EN, Transport Phenomena. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
Gersten, K, Boundary-Layer Theory. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Yilmaz, MT, Vatansever, C, “Three Interval Thixotropy Test to Determine Structural Regeneration of a Glucomannan Based Hydrocolloid Film at Air/Water Interface: Interfacial, Molecular, Thermal and Surface Characterization.” Food Hydrocoll., 61 458–468 (2016)
Cragg, LH, Oene, HV, “Shear Dependence in the Viscometry of High Polymer Solutions: A New Variable-Shear Capillary Viscometer.” Can. J. Chem., 39 (1) 203–215 (1961)
Marvin, RS, “The Accuracy of Measurements of Viscosity of Liquids.” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A, 75 (6) 535–540 (1971)
Southern, JH, Roger, SP, “The Properties of Polyethylene Crystallized Under the Orientation and Pressure Effects of a Pressure Capillary Viscometer.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 14 (9) 2305–2317 (1970)
Kamal, MR, Hla, N, “Capillary Viscometry: A Complete Analysis Including Pressure and Viscous Heating Effects.” Polym. Eng. Sci., 20 (2) 109–119 (1980)
Churaev, NV, Sobolev, VD, Somov, AN, “Slippage of Liquids Over Lyophobic Solid Surfaces.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 97 (2) 574–581 (1984)
Pit, R, Hervet, H, Leger, L, “Direct Experimental Evidence of Slip in Hexadecane: Solid Interfaces.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (5) 980 (2000)
Craig, VSJ, Chiara, N, David, RMW, “Shear-Dependent Boundary Slip in an Aqueous Newtonian Liquid.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 87 (5) 054504 (2001)
Luk, S, Raj, M, Diran, A, “Experimental Observations of Wall Slip: Tube and Packed Bed Flow.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26 (8) 1609–1616 (1987)
Granick, S, Yingxi, Z, Hyunjung, L, “Slippery Questions About Complex Fluids Flowing Past Solids.” Nat. Mater., 2 (4) 221 (2003)
Malengo, A, “Surface Tension Effects in Capillary Viscometers: An Evaluation with an Experimental Comparative Analysis.” Metrologia, 46 (5) 496 (2009)
Kim, S, Cho, YI, Hogenauer, WN, Kensey, KR, “A Method of Isolating Surface Tension and Yield Stress Effects in a U-Shaped Scanning Capillary-Tube Viscometer Using a Casson Model.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 103 (2–3) 205–219 (2002)
Einfeldt, J, “Comments on High-Accuracy Viscosity Measurements Using Capillary Viscometers.” Metrologia, 38 (5) 459 (2001)
Uitterdijk, SJ, “Method for Reducing Surface-Tension Effects in Relative Viscosity Measurements with Ostwald-Type Viscometers.” Metrologia, 34 (2) 153 (1997)
Wedlake, GD, Vera, JH, Ratcliff, GA, “Identification of a Previously Undetected Source of Systematic Error in Capillary Viscometry Measurements.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 50 (1) 93–98 (1979)
Einfeldt, J, Schmelzer, N, “Theory of Capillary Viscometers Taking into Account Surface Tension Effects.” Rheol. Acta, 21 (1) 95–102 (1982)
Karasawa, M, Hasegawa, T, Narumi, T, “Measurement of Dynamic Surface Tension of Surfactant Solutions.” Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi, 35 (5) 265–271 (2007)
Barnes, HA, Hutton, JF, Walters, K, An Introduction to Rheology, Vol. 3. Elsevier, New York (1989)
Bird, RB, Armstrong, RC, Hassager, O, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Vol. 1. Fluid Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1987)
Walawender, WP, Te, YC, David, FC, “An Approximate Casson Fluid Model for Tube Flow of Blood.” Biorheology, 12 (2) 111–119 (1975)
Clement, K, Fangel, P, Jensen, AD, Thomsen, K, Kemiske enhedsoperationer. (In Danish). Polyteknisk Forlag, Kongens Lyngby (2004)
Ji, H, Lim, HM, Chang, YW, “Comparison of the Viscosity of Ceramic Slurries Using a Rotational Rheometer and a Vibrational Viscometer.” J. Korean Ceram. Soc., 49 (6) 542 (2012)
Nwosu, OU, Ewulonu, CM, “Rheological Behaviour of Eco-friendly Drilling Fluids from Biopolymers.” J. Polym. Biopolym. Phys. Chem., 2 (3) 50–54 (2014)
Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology and Architectural Coating Performance.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 16 (2) 263–305 (2019)
ASTM D281-95 (2007) Standard Test Method for Oil Absorption of Pigments by Spatula Rub-out. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2007) https://doi.org/10.1520/d0281-95r07.
Acknowledgment
Financial support from The Hempel Foundation to CoaST (The Hempel Foundation Coating Science and Technology Centre) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, S., Weinell, C.E., Okkels, F. et al. On-line, non-Newtonian capillary rheometry for continuous and in-line coatings production. J Coat Technol Res 18, 611–626 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-020-00447-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-020-00447-9