# Applied rheology and architectural coating performance

- 196 Downloads

## Abstract

Paint rheology is understood to play a vital role in both product performance and customer acceptance. Consequently, the ability to formulate paints having the necessary flow properties is essential for paint technologists. Experienced formulators have said that as much as half the cost of new product development can be consumed in getting the rheology right. In fact, the quality-control viscosity measurement devices in everyday use in the development laboratory are of little help in this endeavor. Among other shortcomings, most such instruments apply shear stresses which are far from those involved in important coating flow processes. The rheological properties required for a successful coating must be defined with due regard to the prevailing conditions of stress involved in application and film formation. This requires that measurements should be taken over a wide range of shear stress and timescales. The task for the applied rheologist is to bridge rheology and technology, but it is often unclear how to connect rheological data with the “real-world” performance of paints, due to the complexity of coating flows. This review in part discusses the use of controlled-stress rheometry to characterize coatings, and presents ways of applying the results effectively to the analysis of paint flow. The methodology is fundamental but not unduly time-consuming, since the objective is to provide sound yet timely guidance to formulators. Thirteen commercial semigloss latex paints were analyzed rheologically to develop correlations to paint performance. Using the method of shear stress mapping, key regions of the non-equilibrium flow curve are identified for the control of paint flow processes. With this approach, simple but strong correlations were obtained of paint flow metrics to viscosity chosen at the relevant stresses. The fact of high correlation means one can expect that an appropriate viscosity adjustment will correspondingly improve performance. It is argued that shear stress, not shear rate, is the correct independent variable both for experimentation and for the graphical presentation and analysis of viscosity data. The yield stress parameter, particle flocculation, and sedimentation are also discussed, and an oscillatory shear method of direct measurement of yield stress is described.

## Keywords

Coating rheology Flow curve Controlled-stress rheometry Experimental rheology Yield stress Leveling Sag Particle settling Flocculation Sedimentation Microstructure## List of symbols

- Φ
Fluidity integral

- Φ(∞)
Total fluidity integral

- Ψ(∞)
Total film fluidity

- Ψ′(∞)
Total film fluidity including effect of striation wavelength

*γ*Shear strain (dimensionless); surface tension

*γ*_{0}Oscillatory strain amplitude

- \( \dot{\gamma } \)
Shear rate, rate of strain, s

^{−1}=*d*γ/*dt**δ*Phase-angle difference of stress and strain maxima in oscillatory deformation

*ε*Hencky extensional strain, dimensionless = ln(

*L*/*L*_{0})- \( \dot{\varepsilon } \)
Hencky extensional strain rate, s

^{−1}=*dε*/*dt**η*Coefficient of viscosity =

*σ*/\( \dot{\gamma } \)*η*(*t*)Viscosity as a function of time

- \( \eta \text{(}\dot{\varepsilon }\text{)} \)
Viscosity as a function of Hencky extensional strain rate

*η*(*σ*)Viscosity as a function of shear stress

*η*_{b}Viscosity at the shear stress of brushing

*η*_{l}Liquid-phase viscosity

*η*_{pl}Plastic viscosity (Bingham model)

*η*_{∞}Casson model “infinite-shear viscosity”

*θ*Angle of rotation of paint roller; angle of inclination to the vertical

- \( \dot{\theta } \)
Roller angular velocity (time derivative of angular rotation)

*λ*Wavelength of coating surface striations

*π*Ratio of circumference of a circle to its diameter

*ρ*Density

*ρ*_{f}Floc (aggregate) density

*ρ*_{l}Liquid density

*ρ*_{p}Density of particle

*σ*Shear stress

*σ*_{app}Shear stress of coating application

*σ*_{lev}Shear stress driving leveling

*σ*_{sag}Shear stress driving sagging

*σ*_{p}Particle shear stress exerted on the surrounding fluid

*σ*_{y}Yield stress

*ω*Angular frequency or velocity (= 2

*πf*) (rad s^{−1})*A*Area of shear face

*A*_{c}Contact area of brush or roller with the substrate

*A*_{p}Surface area of a particle

- AT
Associative thickener

*Ca*Capillary number

*D*Brownian diffusion coefficient, diffusivity

*D*_{f}Hydrodynamically equivalent spherical floc diameter

- DLA
Diffusion-limited aggregation

- DLCA
Diffusion-limited cluster aggregation

*F*Force

- FEA
Finite element analysis

*F*_{app}Force applied to paint applicator device

*F*_{d}Brush or roller drag force

*F*_{g}Force of gravity

*G*Shear modulus

*G**Complex shear modulus

*G*′Storage modulus: energy stored per unit volume per cycle of deformation

*G*″Loss modulus: energy dissipated per unit volume per cycle of deformation

*K*Consistency parameter in power-law constitutive model

*L*Brush stroke length; length dimension

*L*_{c}Capillary length

- MFC
Microfibrous cellulose

- P
Poise, CGS unit of viscosity

- Pa·s
Pascal-second, SI unit of viscosity

*R*Particle radius

- RLA
Reaction-limited aggregation

*T*Absolute temperature, °Κ

*T*_{c}Characteristic time for instability growth

*V*Velocity, volume

*V*_{f}Floc sedimentation velocity

*V*_{r}Relative velocity of a roller and substrate

*W*Brush width

*W*_{b}Work of brushing

*a*Amplitude of coating surface striations

*a*_{0}Time-zero amplitude of coating surface striations

*a*_{∞}Final amplitude of coating surface striations

*d*Particle diameter

*e*Base of natural logarithms = 2.718

*f*Frequency, Hertz (Hz, cycles per second)

*g*Gravitational acceleration 980.17 cm/s

^{2}*h*,*h*_{0}Film thickness

*h*_{f}Liquid filament length

*h*_{l}Thickness of the lubrication layer

*h*(*t*)Coating thickness as a function of time

*k*Number of particles in an aggregate

*k*_{B}Boltzmann constant, 1.381 × 10

^{−16}erg per degree Kelvin*l*Length

*n*Power-law exponent

*r*Roller radius

*t*Time in seconds, s

*t*_{R}Time for a particle to diffuse a distance

*R*, one half its diameter*v*_{diff}Velocity of particle diffusion

*v*_{sed}Velocity of particle sedimentation

*x*Coordinate parallel to substrate

*y*Coordinate normal to substrate

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The author is indebted to Prof. Leonard W. Schwartz and Prof. R. Valery Roy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, from whom in a long and fruitful association he acquired a working knowledge of fluid mechanics, vital to understanding coating flows. The author gratefully thanks Dr. David E. Weidner, for his generous and expert consultation. Ms. Kimberly Hennigan and Ms. Natalie Homann, who performed the majority of the experimentation herein, are acknowledged with gratitude. The author also wishes to thank Dr. Ted Provder for encouraging the writing of this paper. Original experimental data presented herein were previously released for publication by permission of ICI Paints North America.

## References

- 1.Eley, RR, “Rheology and Viscometry.” In: Koleske, JV (ed.)
*Paint and Coatings Testing Manual*, 15th edn., Vol. 36. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (2005)Google Scholar - 2.
- 3.Eley, RR, “Rheology in Coatings, Principles and Methods.” In: Meyers, RA (ed.)
*Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry*, pp. 1839–1869. Wiley, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar - 4.
- 5.Weidner, DE, Schwartz, LW, Eley, RR, “Role of Surface Tension Gradients in Correcting Coating Defects in Corners.”
*J. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**179**66–75 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.
- 7.Eley, RR, Schwartz, LW, “Interaction of Rheology, Geometry, and Process in Coating Flow.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**74**43–53 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Pierce, PE, Donegan, VA, “The Rheology and Application Characteristics of Thixotropic Coatings.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**38**1–8 (1966)Google Scholar - 9.Beeferman, HL, Bergren, DA, “Practical Applications of Rheology in the Paint Industry.”
*J. Paint Technol.*,**38**9–17 (1966)Google Scholar - 10.Khanna, RK, “Rheological Factors Affecting Brush Marks in Gloss Emulsion Paints.”
*Paint Technol.*,**33**23–34 (1969)Google Scholar - 11.Camina, M, Howell, DM, “The Leveling of Paint Films.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**55**929–939 (1972)Google Scholar - 12.
- 13.Quach, A, Hansen, CM, “Evaluation of Leveling Characteristics of Some Latex Paints.”
*J. Paint Technol.*,**46**40–46 (1974)Google Scholar - 14.Sarkar, N, Lalk, RH, “Rheological Correlation with the Application Properties of Latex Paints.”
*J. Paint Technol.*,**46**29–34 (1974)Google Scholar - 15.Glass, JE, “The Role Played by Water-Soluble Polymers in Paint Performance.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**58**169–177 (1975)Google Scholar - 16.Matsuda, T, William, H, Brendley, J, “Transfer and Leveling Processes and Rheological Design in Water-Borne Reverse-Roll Coating Systems.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**51**46–60 (1979)Google Scholar - 17.Colclough, ML, Smith, NDP, Wright, TA, “A Low Shear Viscometer: An Instrument for Measuring Flow and Sag Resistance in Coatings.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**63**183–193 (1980)Google Scholar - 18.Smith, RE, “Brookfield Viscometers for Determination of Low-Shear Viscosity and Leveling Behavior.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**694**21–29 (1982)Google Scholar - 19.Cutrone, L, “Use of Brookfield Viscometer to Predict Rheological Performance of Coatings.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**56**59–63 (1984)Google Scholar - 20.Lu, C-F, “Latex Paint Rheology and Performance Properties.”
*Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev.*,**24**412–417 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Orchard, SE, “On Surface Leveling in Viscous Liquids and Gels.”
*Appl. Sci. Res. A*,**11**451–464 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.Doherty, DJ, Hurd, R, “The Preparation, Properties and Rheological Investigation of Thixotropic Paint Systems.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**41**42–84 (1958)Google Scholar - 23.Wu, S, “Rheology of High Solid Coatings. I. Analysis of Sagging and Slumping.”
*J. Appl. Polym. Sci.*,**22**2769–2782 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Wu, S, “Rheology of High Solid Coatings. II. Analysis of Combined Sagging and Leveling.”
*J. Appl. Polym. Sci.*,**22**2783–2791 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Patton, TC,
*Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion*, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken (1979)Google Scholar - 26.Bauer, DR, Briggs, LM, “Rheological Models for Predicting Flow in High Solids Coatings.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**56**87–97 (1984)Google Scholar - 27.Keunings, R, Bousfield, DW, “Analysis of Surface Tension Driven Leveling of Viscoelastic Films.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**22**219–233 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.Bousfield, DW, “Long-Wave Analysis of Viscoelastic Film Leveling.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**40**47–54 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.Croll, SG, Kisha, LW, “Observations of Sagging in Architectural Paints.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**20**27–52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 30.Cohu, O, Magnin, A, “The Levelling of Thixotropic Coatings.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**28**89–96 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 31.Howison, SD, Moriarty, JA, Ockendon, JR, Terrill, EL, Wilson, SK, “A Mathematical Model for Drying Paint Layers.”
*J. Eng. Math.*,**32**377–394 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 32.Quach, A, “Polymer Coatings: Physics and Mechanics of Leveling.”
*Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev.*,**12**110–116 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 33.Schwartz, LW, Eley, RR, “Flow of Architectural Coatings on Complex Surfaces; Theory and Experiment.”
*J. Eng. Math.*,**43**153–171 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 34.Peters, CA, Nichols, ME, Ellwood, KRJ,
*American Coatings Show*, pp. 1–17. Charlotte, NC (2010)Google Scholar - 35.Seeler, F, Hager, C, Tiedje, O, Schneider, M, “Simulations and Experimental Investigations of Paint Film Leveling.”
*JCT Res.*,**14**767–781 (2017)Google Scholar - 36.Cohu, O, Magnin, A, “Rheology and Flow of Paints in Roll Coating Processes.”
*Surf. Coat. Int.*,**1997**102–107 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 37.Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. Part III. Importance of Extensional Viscosities.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**50**56–71 (1978)Google Scholar - 38.Massouda, DF, “Analysis and Prediction of Roll-Spatter from Latex Paints.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**57**27–36 (1985)Google Scholar - 39.Barnes, HA, Bell, D, “Controlled-Stress Rotational Rheometry: An Historical Review.”
*Korea-Austr. Rheol. J.*,**15**187–196 (2003)Google Scholar - 40.Quemada, D, “Rheological Modelling of Complex Fluids. IV: Thixotropic and “Thixoelastic” Behavior. Start-Up and Stress Relaxation, Creep Tests and Hysteresis Cycles.”
*Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.*,**5**191–207 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 41.Higashitani, K, Iimura, K, “Two-Dimensional Simulation of the Breakup Process of Aggregates in Shear and Elongational Flows.”
*J. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**204**320–327 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 42.Harada, S, Tanaka, R, Nogami, H, Sawada, M, “Dependence of Fragmentation Behavior of Colloidal Aggregates on their Fractal Structure.”
*J. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**301**123–129 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 43.Macosko, CW,
*Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications*, p. 352. VCH, New York (1994)Google Scholar - 44.Rudin, A, Baas, J, “Instrumental Assessment of Application Properties of Latex Paints.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**4**116–120 (1983)Google Scholar - 45.Smith, NDP, Orchard, SE, Rhind-Tutt, AJ, “The Physics of Brushmarks.”
*J. Oil Col. Chem. Assoc.*,**44**618–633 (1961)Google Scholar - 46.Rodd, AB, Davis, CR, Dunstan, DE, Forrest, BA, Boger, DV, “Rheological Characterisation of ‘Weak Gel’ Carrageenan Stabilised Milks.”
*Food Hydrocoll.*,**14**445–454 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 47.Putz, AMV, Burghelea, TI, “The Solid–Fluid Transition in a Yield Stress Shear Thinning Physical Gel.”
*Rheol. Act.*,**48**673–679 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 48.Gusman, S,
*Off. Dig. Fed. Soc. Coat. Technol.*, 296 (1952).Google Scholar - 49.Overdiep, WS, “The Effect of a Reduced Solvent Content of Solvent-Borne Solution Paints on Film Formation.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**14**1–21 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 50.Bosma, M, Haldankar, G, DeGooyer, W, Shalati, M, “Microgels as Additives for Controlling Sag-Leveling Properties.”
*Int. Waterborne High-Solids Powder Coat. Symp.*,**29**395–408 (2002)Google Scholar - 51.Bosma, M, Brinkhuis, R, Coopmans, J, Reuvers, B, “The Role of Sag Control Agents in Optimizing the Sag/Leveling Balance and a New Powerful Tool to Study This.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**55**97–104 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 52.Bosma, M, Brinkhuis, R, Rensen, E, Watson, R, “A New Method for the Quantitative Determination and Prediction of Sag and Levelling in Powder Coatings.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**72**26–33 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 53.Smith, KA, Barsotti, RJ, Bell, GC, “Flow-Induced Surface Roughness of High Solids Finishes on Vertical Substrates.”
*Proc. XIVth Int. Conf. Org. Coat. Sci. Technol.*,**XIV**315–331 (1988)Google Scholar - 54.Pearson, JRA, “The Instability of Uniform Viscous Flow Under Rollers and Spreaders.”
*J. Fluid Mech.*,**7**481–500 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 55.Saucy, D.
*2004 International Coatings Exposition Conference.*Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, (2004)Google Scholar - 56.
*Lubrication Theory*, https://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/ajm8/M3A10/lub.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2018 - 57.Owens, MS, Vinjamur, M, Scriven, LE, Macosko, CW, “Misting of Non-Newtonian Liquids in Forward Roll Coating.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**166**1123–1128 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 58.Fernando, RH, Xing, L-L, Glass, JE, “Erratum to “Rheology Parameters Controlling Spray Atomization and Roll Misting Behavior of Waterborne Coatings”.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**42**284–288 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 59.Ascanio, G, Carreau, PJ, Réglat, O, Tanguy, PA, “Extensional Rheology of Coating Suspensions in Relation with Misting in Film Coaters.”
*Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J.*,**20**48–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 60.Kistler, SE, Schweizer, PM,
*Liquid Film Coating-Scientific Principles and their Technological Implications*. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)Google Scholar - 61.Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. Part I. Commercial Latex Trade Paints.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**50**53–60 (1978)Google Scholar - 62.Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. Part II. Formulation Effects in Experimental Paints.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**50**61–68 (1978)Google Scholar - 63.Keshavarz, B, et al., “Studying the Effects of Elongational Properties on Atomization of Weakly Viscoelastic Solutions Using Rayleigh Ohnesorge Jetting Extensional Rheometry (ROJER).”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**222**171–189 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 64.Caram, Y, Bautista, F, Puig, JE, Manero, O, “On the Rheological Modeling of Associative Polymers.”
*Rheol. Acta*,**46**45–57 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 65.Kostansek, E, “Controlling Particle Dispersion in Latex Paints Containing Associative Thickeners.”
*J. Coat. Technol. Res.*,**4**375–388 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 66.Annable, T, Buscall, R, Ettelaie, R, “Network Formation and Its Consequences for the Physical Behaviour of Associating Polymers in Solution.”
*Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp.*,**31**97–116 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 67.Reuvers, AJ, “Control of Rheology of Waterborne Paints Using Associative Thickeners.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**35**171–181 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 68.Dirking, T, Willenbacher, N, Boggs, L, “Elongational Flow Behavior of Automotive Coatings and its Relation to Atomization and Mottling.”
*Prog. Org. Coat.*,**42**59–64 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 69.Barnes, HA, Walters, K, “The Yield Stress Myth?”
*Rheol. Act.*,**24**323–326 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 70.Barnes, HA, “The Yield Stress—A Review or ‘παντα ρει’—Everything Flows?”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**81**133–188 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 71.Astarita, G, “The Engineering Reality of the Yield Stress.”
*J. Rheol.*,**34**275–277 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 72.Dinkgreve, M, Paredes, J, Denn, MM, Bonn, D, “On Different Ways of Measuring “The” Yield Stress.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**238**233–241 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 73.Cheng, DC-H, “Yield Stress: A Time-Dependent Property and How to Measure It.”
*Rheol. Act.*,**25**542–554 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 74.Nguyen, QD, Boger, DV, “Measuring the Flow Properties of Yield Stress Fluids.”
*Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.*,**24**47–88 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 75.Bonn, D, Denn, MM, “Yield Stress Fluids Slowly Yield to Analysis.”
*Science*,**324**1401–1402 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 76.Fernandes, RR, Andrade, DEV, Franco, AT, Negrao, COR, “The Yielding and the Linear-to-Nonlinear Viscoelastic Transition of an Elastoviscoplastic Material.”
*J. Rheol.*,**61**893–903 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 77.
- 78.Ross, S, Morrison, ID,
*Colloidal Dispersions—Suspensions, Emulsions, and Foams*, Vol. 55. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar - 79.Yang, M-C, Scriven, LE, Macosko, CW, “Some Rheological Measurements on Magnetic Iron Oxide Suspensions in Silicone Oil.”
*J. Rheol.*,**30**1015–1029 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 80.Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology in the Protective and Decorative Coatings Industry,” In: Binding, DM, Walters, K (eds.)
*Rheology Reviews 2005*, pp. 173–240. British Society of Rheology (2005)Google Scholar - 81.Yziquel, F, Carreau, PJ, Moan, M, Tanguy, PA, “Rheological Modeling of Concentrated Colloidal Suspensions.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**86**133–155 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 82.Kostansek, E, “Using Dispersion/Flocculation Phase Diagrams to Visualize Interactions of Associative Polymers, Latexes, and Surfactants.”
*J. Coat. Technol.*,**75**1–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 83.Otsubo, Y, “Comparison of Rheological Behavior of Suspensions Flocculated by Polymer Bridging and Depletion.”
*Nihon Reor. Gak.*,**23**75–80 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 84.Khelifa, A, Hill, PS, “Models for Effective Density and Settling Velocity of Flocs.”
*J. Hydraul. Res.*,**44**390–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2006.9521690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 85.Laxton, PB, Berg, JC, “Colloid Aggregation Arrested by Caging within a Polymer Network.”
*Langmuir*,**24**9268–9272 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 86.Kim, AY, Berg, JC, “Fractal Aggregation: Scaling of Fractal Dimension with Stability Ratio.”
*Langmuir*,**16**2101–2104 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 87.
- 88.Maggi, F, “Variable Fractal Dimension: A Major Control for Floc Structure and Flocculation Kinematics of Suspended Cohesive Sediment.”
*J. Geophys. Res.*,**112**1–12 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 89.Weitz, DA, Oliveria, M, “Fractal Structures Formed by Kinetic Aggregation of Aqueous Gold Colloids.”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*,**52**1433–1436 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 90.Higashitani, K, Iimura, K, Sanda, H, “Simulation of Deformation and Breakup of Large Aggregates in Flows of Viscous Fluids.”
*Chem. Eng. Sci.*,**56**2927–2938 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 91.Solomon, MJ, Spicer, PT, “Microstructural Regimes of Colloidal Rod Suspensions, Gels, and Glasses.”
*Soft Matter*,**6**1391–1400 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 92.Negi, AS, Redmon, CG, Ramakrishnan, S, Osuji, CO, “Viscoelasticity of a Colloidal Gel During Dynamical Arrest: Evolution Through the Critical Gel and Comparison with a Soft Colloidal Glass.”
*J. Rheol.*,**58**1557–1579 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 93.Trappe, V, Sandkühler, P, “Colloidal Gels—Low-Density Disordered Solid-Like States.”
*Curr. Opin. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**8**494–500 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 94.Emady, H, Caggioni, M, Spicer, P, “Colloidal Microstructure Effects on Particle Sedimentation in Yield Stress Fluids.”
*J. Rheol.*,**57**1761–1772 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 95.Beris, AN, Tsamopoulos, JA, Armstrong, RC, Brown, RA, “Creeping Motion of a Sphere Through a Bingham Plastic.”
*J. Fluid Mech.*,**158**219–244 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 96.Atapattu, DD, Chhabra, RP, Uhlherr, PHT, “Creeping Sphere Motion in Herschel–Bulkley Fluids: Flow Field and Drag.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**59**245–265 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 97.Beaulne, M, Mitsoulis, E, “Creeping Motion of a Sphere in Tubes Filled with Herschel–Bulkley Fluids.”
*J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.*,**72**55–71 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 98.Laxton, PB, Berg, JC, “Gel Trapping of Dense Colloids.”
*J. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**285**152–157 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 99.
- 100.Goodwin, JW, Hughes, RW,
*Rheology for Chemists, An Introduction*, 2nd ed., p. 205. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar - 101.Tabuteau, H, Coussot, P, deBruyn, JR, “Drag Force on a Sphere in Steady Motion Through a Yield-Stress Fluid.”
*J. Rheol.*,**51**125–137 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 102.Schwartz, LW, Cender, TA, “The Flow of Thin Liquid Layers on Circular Cylinders.”
*J. Coll. Interf. Sci.*,**533**126–135 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar