Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with tunable sizes for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution

  • Yibing Feng
  • Yi Du
  • Zhongtao Chen
  • Minxing Du
  • Kai Yang
  • Xingjie Lv
  • Zhongfu Li
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, size-tunable magnetite (Fe3O4) nanocrystal spheres were promptly synthesized by a facile one-pot solvothermal process with the presence of triethanolamine as an additive. The as-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometer. The results showed that the synthesized nanoparticles were in the size range of 30–350 nm, had well-defined Fe3O4 crystal phase, and had favorable saturation magnetization. The effects of various important parameters, such as initial Cr(VI) concentration, temperature, and pH, on the adsorption properties of the as-obtained Fe3O4 particles for the removal of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution were deeply analyzed and studied. The results confirmed that the adsorption efficiency was highly pH dependent, decreased with the increasing of initial concentration of Cr(VI), and increased with increasing temperature. The adsorption data were well fitted with the Langmuir isotherm. The maximum adsorption capacity calculated from the Langmuir isotherm was 56.625 mg g−1 at temperature of 35°C and pH of 2.0.

Keywords

Adsorption Cr(VI) Fe3O4 nanoparticles Triethanolamine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Science and Technology Development Project of Shandong Province, China (Grant No. 2013GSF11714).

References

  1. 1.
    Bhaumik, M, Maity, A, Srinivasu, VV, Onyango, MS, “Enhanced Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution Using Polypyrrole/Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanocomposite.” J. Hazard. Mater., 190 (1) 381–390 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrera, DC, Palomar, PPM, Romero, RM, Martínez, S, “Chemical and Electrochemical Considerations on the Removal Process of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Media.” J. Appl. Electrochem., 33 (1) 61–71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coelho, FDS, Ardisson, JD, Moura, FCC, Lago, R, Murad, E, Fabris, JD, “Potential Application of Highly Reactive Fe(0)/Fe3O4 Composites for the Reduction of Cr(VI) Environmental Contaminants.” Chemosphere, 71 (1) 90–96 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Candela, MP, Martínez, JM, Maciá, RT, “Chromium (VI) Removal with Activated Carbons.” Water Res., 29 (9) 2174–2180 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demiral, H, Demiral, İ, Tümsek, F, Karabacakoğlu, B, “Adsorption of Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbon Derived from Olive Bagasse and Applicability of Different Adsorption Models.” Chem. Eng. J., 144 (2) 188–196 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erdem, M, Gür, F, Tümen, F, “Cr(VI) Reduction in Aqueous Solutions by Siderite.” J. Hazard. Mater., 113 (1) 217–222 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gu, HB, Rapole, SB, Sharma, J, Huang, YD, Cao, DM, Colorado, HA, Luo, ZP, Haldolaarachchige, N, Young, DP, Walters, B, Wei, SY, Guo, ZH, “Magnetic Polyaniline Nanocomposites Toward Toxic Hexavalent Chromium Removal.” R. Soc. Chem., 2 11007–11018 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galán, B, Castañeda, D, Ortiz, I, “Integration of Ion Exchange and Non-Dispersive Solvent Extraction Processes for the Separation and Concentration of Cr(VI) from Ground Waters.” J. Hazard. Mater., 152 (2) 795–804 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golbaz, S, Jafari, AJ, Rafiee, M, Kalantary, RR, “Separate and Simultaneous Removal of Phenol, Chromium, and Cyanide from Aqueous Solution by Coagulation/Precipitation: Mechanisms and Theory.” Chem. Eng. J., 253 (1) 251–257 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gudavarthy, RV, Gorantla, S, Mu, G, Kulp, EA, Gemming, T, Eckert, J, Switzeret, JA, “Epitaxial Electrodeposition of Fe3O4 on Single-Crystal Ni (111).” Chem. Mater., 23 (8) 2017–2019 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gang, ZY, Yu, SH, Dong, PS, Qin, HM, “Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Ethylenediamine-Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Polymers for Removal of Cr(VI) in Wastewater.” J. Hazard. Mater., 182 (1–3) 295–302 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsu, LC, Wang, SL, Lin, YC, Wang, MK, Chiang, PN, Liu, JC, Kuan, WH, Chen, CC, Tzou, YM, “Cr(VI) Removal on Fungal Biomass of Neurospora Crassa: The Importance of Dissolved Organic Carbons Derived from the Biomass to Cr(VI) Reduction.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44 (16) 6202–6208 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu, JS, Zhong, LS, Song, WG, Wan, LJ, “Synthesis of Hierarchically Structured Metal Oxides and Their Application in Heavy Metal Ion Removal.” Adv. Mater., 20 (15) 2977–2982 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu, J, Chen, GH, Lo, IMC, “Removal and Recovery of Cr(VI) from Wastewater by Maghemite Nanoparticles.” Water Res., 39 (18) 4528–4536 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu, J, Irene, MC, Chen, GH, “Fast Removal and Recovery of Cr(VI) Using Surface-Modified Jacobsite (MnFe2O4) Nanoparticles.” Langmuir, 21 (24) 11173–11179 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, GY, Xu, SM, Lu, SS, Li, LY, Sun, HY, “Micro-/Nanostructured Co3O4 Anode with Enhanced Rate Capability for Lithium-Ion Batteries.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (10) 7236–7243 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, WJ, Pelaez, M, Dionysiou, DD, Entezaric, MH, Tsoutsoud, D, O’Shea, K, “Chromium (VI) Removal by Maghemite Nanoparticles.” Chem. Eng. J., 222 (15) 527–533 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, PA, Ray, M, Chakraborty, S, “Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Wastewater Using Aniline Formaldehyde Condensate Coated Silica Gel.” J. Hazard. Mater., 143 (1–2) 24–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kobya, M, “Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Hazelnut Shell Activated Carbon: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies.” Bioresour. Technol., 91 (3) 317–321 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, EJ, Lee, CS, Chang, YY, Chang, YS, “Hierarchically Structured Manganese Oxide-Coated Magnetic Nanocomposites for the Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Systems.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 5 (19) 9628–9634 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang, YS, Risbud, S, Rabolt, J, Stroeve, P, “Brewster Angle Microscopy Study of a Magnetic Nanoparticle/Polymer Complex at the Air/Water Interface.” Langmuir, 12 (18) 4345–4349 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karthikeyan, T, Rajgopal, S, Miranda, LR, “Chromium (VI) Adsorption from Aqueous Solution by Hevea Brasilinesis Sawdust Activated Carbon.” J. Hazard. Mater., 124 (1–3) 192–199 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lei, YL, Chen, F, Luo, YJ, Zhang, L, “Three-Dimensional Magnetic Graphene Oxide Foam/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite as an Efficient Absorbent for Cr(VI) Removal.” J. Mater. Sci., 49 (12) 4236–4245 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, SS, Chen, YZ, Zhang, LD, Hua, GM, Xu, W, Li, N, Zhang, Y, “Enhanced Removal of Trace Cr(VI) Ions from Aqueous Solution by Titanium Oxide–Ag Composite Adsorbents.” J. Hazard. Mater., 190 (3) 723–728 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu, W, Huang, F, Wang, YJ, Zou, T, Zheng, JS, Lin, Z, “Recycling Mg(OH)2 Nanoadsorbent During Treating the Low Concentration of Cr(VI).” Environ. Sci. Technol., 45 (5) 1955–1961 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, H, Wang, GF, Zhang, F, Cai, Y, Wang, YD, Djerdj, I, “Surfactant-Assisted Synthesis of CeO2 Nanoparticles and Their Application in Wastewater Treatment.” R. Soc. Chem., 2 12413–12423 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu, YB, Wang, YQ, Zhou, SM, Lou, SY, Yuan, L, Gao, T, Wu, XP, Shi, XJ, Wang, K, “Synthesis of High Saturation Magnetization Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 Hollow Microspheres for Swift Chromium Removal.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 4 (9) 913–4920 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lu, CH, Lai, YC, Kale, RB, “Influence of Alkaline Sources on the Structural and Morphological Properties of Hydrothermally Derived Zinc Oxide Powders.” J. Alloys Compd., 477 (1–2) 523–528 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li, L, Liang, J, Kang, H, Fang, JZ, Luo, M, Jin, XY, “TEA-Assisted Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Mn3O4 Octahedrons and Their Magnetic Properties.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 261 (15) 717–721 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee, SY, Kim, DH, Choi, SC, Lee, DJ, Choi, JY, Kim, HD, “Porous Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by using Catalytic Oxidation via Transition Metal Oxide.” Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 194 46–51 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lalatonne, Y, Richardi, J, Pileni, MP, “Vander Waals Versus Dipolar Forces Controlling Mesoscopic Organizations of Magnetic Nanocrystals.” Nat. Mater., 3 121–125 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mitra, S, Poizot, P, Finke, A, Tarason, JM, “Growth and Electrochemical Characterization Versus Lithium of Fe3O4 Electrodes Made by Electrodeposition.” Adv. Function. Mater., 16 (17) 2281–2287 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ohtake, H, Hardoyo, “New Biological Method for Detoxification and Removal of Hexavalent Chromium.” Water Sci. Technol., 25 (11) 395–402 (1992)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park, HJ, Tavlarides, LL, “Adsorption of Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using an Imidazole Functionalized Adsorbent.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47 (10) 3401–3409 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rengaraj, S, Yeon, KH, Moon, SH, “Removal of Chromium from Water and Wastewater by Ion Exchange Resins.” J. Hazard. Mater., 87 (1–3) 273–287 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharma, YC, Srivastava, V, “Comparative Studies of Removal of Cr(VI) and Ni (II) from Aqueous Solutions by Magnetic Nanoparticles.” J. Chem. Eng., 56 (4) 819–825 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma, YC, Srivastava, V, Mukherjee, AK, “Synthesis and Application of Nano-Al2O3 Powder for the Reclamation of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solutions.” J. Chem. Eng., 55 (7) 2390–2398 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Selvi, K, Pattabhi, S, Kadirvelu, K, “Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon.” Bioresour. Technol., 80 (1) 87–89 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saikia, J, Bedabrata, S, Das, G, “Efficient Removal of Chromate and Arsenate from Individual and Mixed System by Malachite Nanoparticles.” J. Hazard. Mater., 186 (1) 575–582 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang, YQ, Zou, BF, Gao, T, Wu, XP, Lou, SY, Zhou, SM, “Synthesis of Orange-like Fe3O4/PPy Composite Microspheres and Their Excellent Cr(VI) Ion Removal Properties.” J. Mater. Chem., 22 (18) 9034–9040 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao, Y, Shen, H, Pan, S, Hu, M, “Preparation and Characterization of Amino-Functionalized Nano-Fe3O4 Magnetic Polymer Adsorbents for Removal of Chromium(VI) Ions.” J. Mater. Sci., 45 (19) 5291–5301 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao, Y, Shen, H, Pan, S, Hu, M, “Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Ethylenediamine-Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Polymers for Removal of Cr(VI) in Wastewater.” J. Hazard. Mater., 182 295–302 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shen, H, Chen, J, Dai, H, et al., “New Insights into the Sorption and Detoxification of Chromium(VI) by Tetraethylenepentamine Functionalized Nanosized Magnetic Polymer Adsorbents: Mechanism and pH Effect.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52 (36) 12723–12732 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yao, X, Deng, S, Wu, R, Hong, S, et al., “Highly Efficient Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Electroplating Wastewater Using Aminated Wheat Straw.” RSC Adv., 6 8797–8805 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang, G, Chang, Q, Han, XT, Zhang, MY, “Removal of Cr (VI) from Aqueous Solution by Flocculant with the Capacity of Reduction and Chelation.” J. Hazard. Mater., 248 115–121 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang, LX, Li, JC, Jiang, Q, Zhao, LJ, “Water-Soluble Fe3O4 Nanoparticles with High Solubility for Removal of Heavy-Metal Ions from Waste Water.” Dalton Trans., 41 (15) 4544–4551 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yuan, P, Liu, D, Fan, MD, Yang, D, Zhu, RL, Ge, F, Zhu, JX, He, HP, “Removal of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] from Aqueous Solutions by the Diatomite-Supported/Unsupported Magnetite Nanoparticles.” J. Hazard. Mater., 173 (1–3) 614–621 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yuan, P, Fan, MD, Yang, D, He, HP, Liu, D, Yuan, AH, Zhu, JX, Chen, TH, “Montmorillonite-Supported Magnetite Nanoparticles for the Removal of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] from Aqueous Solutions.” J. Hazard. Mater., 166 (2–3) 821–829 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhu, JH, Wei, SY, Gu, HB, Rapole, SB, Wang, Q, Luo, ZP, Haldolaarachchige, N, Young, DP, Guo, ZH, “One-Pot Synthesis of Magnetic Graphene Nanocomposites Decorated with Core@ Double-Shell Nanoparticles for Fast Chromium Removal.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 46 (2) 977–985 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zheng, J, Liu, ZQ, Zhao, XS, Liu, M, Liu, X, Chu, W, “One-Step Solvothermal Synthesis of Fe3O4@C Core–Shell Nanoparticles with Tunable Sizes.” Nanotechnology, 23 16 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yibing Feng
    • 1
  • Yi Du
    • 1
  • Zhongtao Chen
    • 1
  • Minxing Du
    • 1
  • Kai Yang
    • 1
  • Xingjie Lv
    • 1
  • Zhongfu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Processing and Testing Technology of Glass, Functional Ceramics of Shandong ProvinceQilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences)JinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations