Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1035–1047 | Cite as

Corrosion protection performance of nanocomposite coatings under static, UV, and dynamic conditions

  • Y. A. Basiru
  • Sh. Ammar
  • K. Ramesh
  • B. Vengadaesvaran
  • S. Ramesh
  • A. K. Arof


Silicone-modified epoxy polymeric matrix was successfully fabricated and reinforced with 1–2 wt% SiO2, TiO2, and TiSiO4 nanoparticles. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, differential scanning calorimetry, and field-emission scanning electron microscopy together with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were employed to investigate different characteristics of the prepared coatings. To simulate operating conditions, all samples were characterized via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) after being subjected to different conditions. Corrosion under static conditions, in which the samples were exposed to a static electrolyte without further change in other parameters, was investigated. Furthermore, to study the effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in accelerating the degradation of the coatings, samples were characterized after being subjected to UV while immersed statically in the electrolyte. Additionally, the corrosion protection performance was investigated after subjecting the coated substrates to dynamic conditions involving continuous movement of the sample in the electrolyte, simulating continuous wear of the coated surfaces. Compared with the static condition, the EIS results revealed the vital role of the silicone resin and nanoparticles in improving the stability of the coating film against corrosion degradation in the presence of UV radiation, while poor performance in dynamic condition was recorded for all the coating systems.


Nanocomposites Organic coatings EIS Dynamic corrosion UV degradation 



The authors would like to thank the University of Malaya for support of this study through Research Grants BKS027–2017, PG011-2015B, PG001–2016A, and PG059-2016A.


  1. 1.
    Revie, RW, Corrosion and Corrosion Control. Wiley, New York, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mat Nor, N, Ismail, L, Jamari, S, Ramesh, K, Vengadaesvaran, B, Arof, A, “Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Study of CuO and Cu Coating Systems.” Pigment Resin Technol., 43 (6) 371–378 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, JR, Corrosion: Understanding the Basics. ASM International, Materials Park, 2000Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ikechukwu, EE, Pauline, EO, “Environmental Impacts of Corrosion on the Physical Properties of Copper and Aluminium: A Case Study of the Surrounding Water Bodies in Port Harcourt.” Open J. Soc. Sci., 3 (02) 143 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathiazhagan, A, Joseph, R, “Nanotechnology—A New Prospective in Organic Coating-Review.” Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl., 2 (4) 225 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miklečić, J, Blagojević, SL, Petrič, M, Jirouš-Rajković, V, “Influence of TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles on Properties of Waterborne Polyacrylate Coating Exposed to Outdoor Conditions.” Prog. Org. Coat., 89 67–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ammar, S, Ramesh, K, Vengadaesvaran, B, Ramesh, S, Arof, A, “A Novel Coating Material that Uses Nano-sized SiO2 Particles to Intensify Hydrophobicity and Corrosion Protection Properties.” Electrochim. Acta, 220 417–426 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ammar, S, Ramesh, K, Azman, NAN, Vengadaesvaran, B, Ramesh, S, Arof, A, “Comparison Studies on the Anticorrosion and Overall Performance of Solvent/Water Based Epoxy-Copper Reinforced Composite Coatings.” Mater. Express, 6 403–413 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stack, M, Chacon-Nava, J, Stott, F, “Relationship Between the Effects of Velocity and Alloy Corrosion Resistance in Erosion–Corrosion Environments at Elevated Temperatures.” Wear, 180 (1) 91–99 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borenstein, S, Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion Handbook. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vasyliev, GS, “The Influence of Flow Rate on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Hot Tap Water.” Corros. Sci., 98 33–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hang, TTX, Dung, NT, Truc, TA, Duong, NT, Van Truoc, B, Vu, PG, Hoang, T, Thanh, DTM, Olivier, M-G, “Effect of Silane Modified Nano ZnO on UV Degradation of Polyurethane Coatings.” Prog. Org. Coat., 79 68–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asmatulu, R, Mahmud, GA, Hille, C, Misak, HE, “Effects of UV Degradation on Surface Hydrophobicity, Crack, and Thickness of MWCNT-Based Nanocomposite Coatings.” Prog. Org. Coat., 72 (3) 553–561 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amirudin, A, Thieny, D, “Application of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy to Study the Degradation of Polymer-Coated Metals.” Prog. Org. Coat., 26 (1) 1–28 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nikolic, G, Zlatkovic, S, Cakic, M, Cakic, S, Lacnjevac, C, Rajic, Z, “Fast Fourier Transform IR Characterization of Epoxy GY Systems Crosslinked with Aliphatic and Cycloaliphatic EH Polyamine Adducts.” Sensors, 10 (1) 684–696 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cholake, ST, Mada, MR, Raman, RS, Bai, Y, Zhao, X, Rizkalla, S, Bandyopadhyay, S, “Quantitative Analysis of Curing Mechanisms of Epoxy Resin by Mid- and Near-Fourier Transform Infra Red Spectroscopy.” Def. Sci. J., 64 (3) 314 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mustata, F, Bicu, I, “Hydroxyesters of Resin Acids Modified Withoff-Cresol/p-Nonylphenol Formaldehyde Resins.” Polimery, 54 627 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paluvai, NR, Mohanty, S, Nayak, S, “Synthesis and Modifications of Epoxy Resins and Their Composites: A Review.” Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 53 1723–1758 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ammar, S, Ramesh, K, Vengadaesvaran, B, Ramesh, S, Arof, A, “Amelioration of Anticorrosion and Hydrophobic Properties of Epoxy/PDMS Composite Coatings Containing Nano ZnO Particles.” Prog. Org. Coat., 92 54–65 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, BC, Infrared Spectral Interpretation: A Systematic Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rogerio-Candelera, MA, Lazzari, M, Cano, E, Science and Technology for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ammar, S, Ramesh, K, Ma, I, Farah, Z, Vengadaesvaran, B, Ramesh, S, Arof, A, “Studies on SiO2-Hybrid Polymeric Nanocomposite Coatings with Superior Corrosion Protection and Hydrophobicity.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 324 536–545 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ammar, S, Ramesh, K, Vengadaesvaran, B, Ramesh, S, Arof, A, “Formulation and Characterization of Hybrid Polymeric/ZnO Nanocomposite Coatings with Remarkable Anti-corrosion and Hydrophobic Characteristics.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 13 921–930 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, D, Wang, L, Qian, H, Li, X, “Superhydrophobic Surfaces for Corrosion Protection: A Review of Recent Progresses and Future Directions.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 13 (1) 11–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogihara, H, Xie, J, Okagaki, J, Saji, T, “Simple Method for Preparing Superhydrophobic Paper: Spray-Deposited Hydrophobic Silica Nanoparticle Coatings Exhibit High Water-Repellency and Transparency.” Langmuir, 28 (10) 4605–4608 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bravo, J, Zhai, L, Wu, Z, Cohen, RE, Rubner, MF, “Transparent Superhydrophobic Films Based on Silica Nanoparticles.” Langmuir, 23 (13) 7293–7298 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, S, Li, Y, Fei, X, Sun, M, Zhang, C, Li, Y, Yang, Q, Hong, X, “Preparation of a Durable Superhydrophobic Membrane by Electrospinning Poly (Vinylidene Fluoride)(PVDF) Mixed with Epoxy–Siloxane Modified SiO2 Nanoparticles: A Possible Route to Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Low Water Sliding Angle and High Water Contact Angle.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 359 (2) 380–388 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramezanzadeh, B, Attar, M, Farzam, M, “A Study on the Anticorrosion Performance of the Epoxy–Polyamide Nanocomposites Containing ZnO Nanoparticles.” Prog. Org. Coat., 72 (3) 410–422 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seyedmehdi, S, Zhang, H, Zhu, J, “Influence of Production Method, Silicone Type and Thickness on Silicon Rubber Superhydrophobic Coatings.” Prog. Org. Coat., 90 291–295 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ryu, H-Y, Yoon, SH, Han, D-H, Hafeez, H, Paluvai, NR, Lee, CS, Park, J-G, “Fabrication of Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Switchable Aluminum Surface Using Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide).” Prog. Org. Coat., 99 295–301 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Finšgar, M, Petovar, B, Xhanari, K, Maver, U, “The Corrosion Inhibition of Certain Azoles on Steel in Chloride Media: Electrochemistry and Surface Analysis.” Corros. Sci., 111 370–381 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, W, Xu, Q, Han, J, Chen, X, Min, Y, “A Novel Combination Approach for the Preparation of Superhydrophobic Surface on Copper and the Consequent Corrosion Resistance.” Corros. Sci., 110 105–113 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yuan, X, Yue, Z, Chen, X, Wen, S, Li, L, Feng, T, “EIS Study of Effective Capacitance and Water Uptake Behaviors of Silicone-Epoxy Hybrid Coatings on Mild Steel.” Prog. Org. Coat., 86 41–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mostafaei, A, Nasirpouri, F, “Epoxy/Polyaniline–ZnO Nanorods Hybrid Nanocomposite Coatings: Synthesis, Characterization and Corrosion Protection Performance of Conducting Paints.” Prog. Org. Coat., 77 (1) 146–159 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mahdi, E, Rauf, A, Eltai, E, “Effect of Temperature and Erosion on Pitting Corrosion of X100 Steel in Aqueous Silica Slurries Containing Bicarbonate and Chloride Content.” Corros. Sci., 83 48–58 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang, Y, Xing, Z, Luo, Q, Rahman, A, Jiao, J, Qu, S, Zheng, Y, Shen, J, “Corrosion and Erosion–Corrosion Behaviour of Activated Combustion High-Velocity Air Fuel Sprayed Fe-Based Amorphous Coatings in Chloride-Containing Solutions.” Corros. Sci., 98 339–353 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wood, RJ, “Erosion–Corrosion Interactions and Their Effect on Marine and Offshore Materials.” Wear, 261 (9) 1012–1023 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. A. Basiru
    • 1
  • Sh. Ammar
    • 1
  • K. Ramesh
    • 1
  • B. Vengadaesvaran
    • 1
  • S. Ramesh
    • 1
  • A. K. Arof
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Ionics University of Malaya, Department of PhysicsUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations