Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 749–755 | Cite as

Hydrophobic properties of cardboard coated with polylactic acid and ethylene scavengers

  • Amaury Taboada-Rodríguez
  • Isabel García-García
  • Rita Cava-Roda
  • Antonio López-Gómez
  • Fulgencio Marín-Iniesta
Brief Communication


The corrugated cardboard used in food packaging readily absorbs moisture from the environment, especially when stored under high humidity conditions. In this research, the water barrier of cardboard was modified by changing the wettability of the cardboard surface, applying hydrophobic coatings of polylactic acid (PLA), alone or in combination with other substances that absorb gases (ethylene scavengers) such as clinoptilolite (C), sepiolite (S), and sepiolite permanganate (SP). The water barrier properties tested as water vapor permeability (WVP), water absorptiveness (WA), and water drop contact angle (CA) showed that the water resistance of the resulting cardboard was improved by the coating. The best results of these properties were obtained by using a coating of PLA 2% alone. In addition, PLA 2% with C 1.5% also showed good results, but the WA results were higher. The use of PLA coating produces a greater uniformity and smoothness of the coated cardboard surface due to the best filling of the pores or spaces between cellulose fibers. Our findings and the environmentally friendly nature of PLA strengthen the advantages of using these kinds of coatings on cardboard trays for the packaging, storage, and transport of foods such as fresh fruit and vegetables.


PLA coating Ethylene scavengers Cardboard Water barrier properties 


  1. 1.
    Twede, D, Selke, SEM, Corrugated Fiberboard Structure and Properties. Cartons, Crates and Corrugated Board: Handbook of Paper and Wood Packaging Technology. DesStech Publications, Lancaster (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lopez-Rubio, A, Gavara, R, Lagaron, JM, “Bioactive Packaging: Turning Foods into Healthier Foods Through Biomaterials.” Trends Food Sci. Technol., 17 (10) 567–575 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rhim, JW, Lee, JH, Ng, PKW, “Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Biodegradable Soy Protein Isolate Based Films Coated with Polylactic Acid.” Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 40 (2) 232–238 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krook, M, Gällsted, M, Hedenqvist, MS, “A Study on Montmorillonite/Polyethylene Nanocomposite Extrusion-Coated Paperboard.” Packag. Technol. Sci., 18 (1) 11–20 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robertson, GL, Paper and Paper-Based Packaging Materials. Food Packaging, Principles and Practice. Marcel Dekker, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robson, NC, “Recycling Practice and Problems.” International Symposium on Packaging, Economic Development and the Environment. Institute of Packaging Professionals, Herndon, VA (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gällstedt, M, Brottman, A, Hedenqvist, MS, “Packaging-Related Properties of Protein and Chitosan Coated Paper.” Packag. Technol. Sci., 18 (4) 161–170 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Plackett, DV, Holm, VK, Johansen, P, Ndoni, S, Nielsen, PV, Sipilainen-Malm, T, Södergård, A, Verstichel, S, “Characterization of L-Polylactide and L-Polylactide-Polycaprolactone Co-polymer Films for Use in Cheese-Packaging Applications.” Packag. Technol. Sci., 19 (1) 1–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Datta, R, Henry, M, “Lactic Acid: Recent Advances in Products, Processes and Technologies—A Review.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 81 (7) 1119–1129 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rhim, JW, Lee, JH, Hong, SI, “Water Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Biopolymer (Alginate and Soy Protein) Coated Paperboards.” Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 39 (7) 806–813 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garlotta, DA, “A Literature Review of Poly(lactic acid).” J. Polym. Environ., 9 (2) 63–84 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim, LT, Auras, R, Rubino, M, “Processing Technologies for Poly(lactic acid).” Prog. Polym. Sci., 33 (8) 820–852 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conn, RE, Kolstad, JJ, Borzelleca, JF, Dixle, DS, Filer, LJ, Jr, LaDu, BN, Jr, Pariza, MW, “Safety Assessment of Polylactide (PLA) for Use as a Food-Contact Polymer.” Food Chem. Toxicol., 33 (4) 273–283 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber, CJ, Haugaard, V, Festersen, R, Bertelsen, G, “Production and Applications of Biobased Packaging Materials for the Food Industry.” Food Addit. Contam., 19 (1) 172–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaves, AR, Mugrider, A, Fernandez-Lozano, J, Limongelli, JC, “Biodegradable and Biodesintegrable Films Employed for the Storage of Long Keeping Tomatoes.” Investigación Agraria. Producción y Protección de Vegetales, 13 (1–2) 173–184 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    García-García, I, Taboada-Rodríguez, A, López-Gómez, A, Marín-Iniesta, F, “Active Packaging of Cardboard to Extend the Shelf Life of Tomatoes.” Food Bioprocess Technol., 6 (3) 754–761 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zagory, D, Ethylene-Removing Packaging: Active Food Packaging. Blackie Academic and Professional, London (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oms-Oliu, G, Soliva-Fortuny, R, Martín-Belloso, O, “Effect of Ripeness on the Shelf-Life of Fresh-Cut Melon Preserved by Modified Atmosphere Packaging.” Eur. Food Res. Technol., 225 (3–4) 301–311 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aguayo, E, Escalona, V, Artés, F, “Quality of Fresh-Cut Tomato as Affected by Type of Cut, Packaging, Temperature and Storage Time.” Eur. Food Res. Technol., 219 (5) 492–499 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeEll, JR, Toivnonen, PMA, Cornut, F, Vigneualt, C, “Addition of Sorbitol with KMnO4 Improves Broccoli Quality Retention in Modified Atmosphere Packages.” J. Food Qual., 29 (1) 65–75 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vermeiren, L, Devlieghere, F, van Beest, M, de Kruijf, N, Debevere, J, “Developments in the Active Packaging of Foods.” Trends Food Sci. Technol., 10 (3) 77–86 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aktas, SN, Esin, A, Bayindirli, A, “A New Protective Polyethylene Based Film Containing Zeolites for the Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables: Film Preparation.” Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 27 (4) 1–9 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Auras, R, Selke, S, Yuzay, IE, “Poly(Lactic Acid) and Zeolite Composites and Method of Manufacturing the Same.” US Patent 20100236969, 2010Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barrer, RM, Makki, MB, “Molecular Sieve Sorbents from Clinoptilolite.” Can. J. Chem., 42 1481–1487 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sendek, ME, Virji, MA, White, DA, Bussey, RL, “Water Sorption Properties of Modified Clinoptilolite.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 11 (2) 137–141 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilkin, RT, Barnes, HL, “Thermodynamics of Hydration of Na- and K-Clinoptilolite to 300 C.” Phys. Chem. Miner., 26 468–476 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Polat, E, Karaca, M, Demir, H, Naci-Onus, A, “Use of Natural Zeolite (Clinoptilolite) in Agriculture.” J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 12 (Special ed.) 183–189 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kilincarslan, A, Akyil, S, “Uranium Adsorption Characteristic and Thermodynamic Behavior of Clinoptilolite Zeolite.” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 264 (3) 541–548 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alvarez, JB, García, PA, “Reactive Absorbents for the Conservation of Harvested Vegetable Products”. US Patent 4,906,398, 1990Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Galán, E, “Properties and Applications of Palygorskite-Sepiolite Clays.” Clay Miner., 31 443–453 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, J, Ren, S, Guo, M, “Preparation and Humidity Controlling Behaviors of Sepiolite/Polyacrylic Acid (Sodium) Composite.” Proc. Eng., 27 423–430 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rhim, JW, Mohanty, AK, Singh, SP, Ng, PKW, “Effect of the Processing Methods on the Performance of Polylactide Films: Thermocompression.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 101 (6) 3736–3742 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rhim, JW, Kim, JH, “Properties of Poly(lactide)-Coated Paperboard for the Use of 1-way Paper Cup.” J. Food Sci., 74 (2) 105–111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gennadios, A, Weller, CL, Gooding, CH, “Measurement Errors in Water Vapor Permeability of Highly Permeable, Hydrophilic Edible Films.” J. Food Eng., 21 (4) 395–409 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han, JH, Krochta, JM, “Wetting Properties and Water Vapor Permeability of Whey-Protein-Coated Paper.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 42 (5) 1375–1382 (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Santangelo, S, Gorrasi, G, Di Lieto, R, De Pasquale, S, Patimo, G, Piperopoulos, E, Lanza, M, Faggio, G, Mauriello, F, Messina, G, Milone, C, “Polylactide and Carbon Nanotubes/Smectite-Clay Nanocomposites: Preparation, Characterization, Sorptive and Electrical Properties.” Appl. Clay Sci., 53 188–194 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rhim, JW, Lee, JH, Hong, SI, “Increase in Water Resistance of Paperboard by Coating with Poly(lactide).” Packag. Technol. Sci., 20 (6) 393–402 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mejía, A, García, N, Guzmán, J, Tiemblo, P, “Confinement and Nucleation Effects in Poly(ethylene oxide) Melt-Compounded with Neat and Coated Sepiolite Nanofibers: Modulation of the Structure and Semicrystalline Morphology.” Eur. Polym. J., 49 (1) 118–129 (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guosheng, L, Jinsheng, L, Yan, D, Guangchuan, L, Qingguo, T, “Influence of Microstructure of Sepiolite on Its Water Vapor Adsorption Properties.” J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vargha-Butler, EI, Kiss, E, Lam, CNC, Keresztes, Z, Kálmán, E, Zhang, L, Neumann, AW, “Wettability of Biodegradable Surfaces.” Colloid Polym. Sci., 279 1160–1168 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association & Oil and Colour Chemists' Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amaury Taboada-Rodríguez
    • 2
  • Isabel García-García
    • 2
  • Rita Cava-Roda
    • 2
  • Antonio López-Gómez
    • 1
  • Fulgencio Marín-Iniesta
    • 2
  1. 1.Food Engineering and Agricultural Equipment DepartmentUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain
  2. 2.Food Technology, Nutrition and Bromatology DepartmentUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations