How to blow the Whistle and still have a career afterwards


Filing charges of scientific misconduct can be a risky and dangerous endeavor. This article presents rules of conduct to follow when considering whether to report perceived misconduct, and a set of step-by-step procedures for responsible whistleblowing that describe how to do so once the decision to report misconduct has been made. This advice is framed within the university setting, and may not apply fully in industrial settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences (National Academy Press, 1995), second edition, p. 18.

  2. 2.

    Guidelines for Ethical Practices in Research, Office of Research Integrity at the University of Pittsburgh, May 1997, p. 7.

  3. 3.

    Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume I, National Academy of Sciences (National Academy Press, 1992), recommendation 11, pp. 16–17.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. K. Gunsalus JD.

Additional information

Ms. Gunsalus, an attorney, has been responsible for a wide range of compliance issues and academic policy matters at her university including responding to allegations of scientific misconduct. She served on the United States Commission on Research Integrity and spent six years on the AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility, four of them as chair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunsalus, C.K. How to blow the Whistle and still have a career afterwards. SCI ENG ETHICS 4, 51–64 (1998).

Download citation


  • ethics
  • policies
  • scientific misconduct
  • young scientists
  • whistleblowing