Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: The scientific community’s responses to Whistleblowing

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sprague, R. L. (1998) The Voice of Experience, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sieber, J.E. (1998) The Psychology of Whistleblowing, Science and Engineering Ethics 4:7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKnight, D.M. (1998) Scientific Societies and Whistleblowers: the Relationship between the Community and the Individual, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunsalus, C.K. (1998) Preventing the Need for Whistleblowing: Practical Advice for University Administrators, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gunsalus, C.K. (1998) How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rm. 12-187, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Stephanic J. Bird Ph.D.

  2. The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Diane Hoffman-Kim Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Stephanic J. Bird Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diane Hoffman-Kim Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The papers in this issue (by Sprague,1 Sieber,2 McKnight3 and Gunsalus4,5) are based on presentations by the authors at the 163nd National Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Seattle, Washington, 13–18 February 1997 in the session entitled Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: What the Scientific Community Can Do about Whistleblowing organized by Stephanie J. Bird and Diane Hoffman-Kim. The papers have been modified following double blind peer review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bird, S.J., Hoffman-Kim, D. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: The scientific community’s responses to Whistleblowing. SCI ENG ETHICS 4, 3–6 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0001-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0001-6

Search

Navigation