To explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding plagiarism in a large culturally diverse sample of researchers who participated in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing. An online survey was designed and delivered through Google Forms to the participants in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing during April to June 2017. A total of 765 participants completed the survey (response rate 47.8%), and 746 responses were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (97.6%) reported knowledge of the term “plagiarism”, and 89.1% of them understand the meaning of the term before joining the course. Most participants reported that their university does not provide access to plagiarism detection software (82.0%), and 35% participants admitted they had been involved in plagiarism during their education. Overall attitudes toward plagiarism (65.3 ± 10.93) indicated low acceptance of plagiarism. Moreover, low scores were reported for approval attitude (25.22 ± 5.63), disapproval attitude (11.78 ± 3.64), and knowledge of subjective norms (20.63 ± 5.22). The most common reason for plagiarizing was lack of time (16.1%), and the most common consequence was the perception that “those who plagiarize are not respected or seen positively” (71.4%). Developing country researchers appear to be familiar with the concept of plagiarism, but knowledge among the participants surveyed here was incomplete. Knowledge about plagiarism and awareness of its harmfulness must be improved, because there is an obvious relationship between attitudes toward plagiarism and knowledge, reasons and consequences. The use of plagiarism-detection software can raise awareness about plagiarism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Similarity index is a measure of the extent of overlap or match between an author’s file compared to other sources in the Turnitin databases. It helps locate matching or similar text in a submitted work, but does not directly identify plagiarism. Turnitin users must decide whether the overlapping or matching text is intentional plagiarism, unintentional plagiarism, or improper/lack of citation.
COPE Flowcharts: https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts.
Alfaro-Toloza, P., Mayta-Tristan, P., & Rodriguez-Morales, A. J. (2013). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a Latin American perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion,29(2), 99–100. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.755504.
Almeida, R. M. V., de Albuquerque Rocha, K., Catelani, F., Fontes-Pereira, A. J., & Vasconcelos, S. M. (2016). Plagiarism allegations account for most retractions in major Latin American/Caribbean databases. Science and Engineering Ethics,22(5), 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9714-5.
Amos, K. A. (2014). The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations. Journal of the Medical Library Association,102(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005.
Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low-and middle-income countries. PLoS Medicine,10(3), e1001315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315.
Aziz, J., Hashim, F., & Razak, N. A. (2012). Anecdotes of plagiarism: Some pedagogical issues and considerations. Asian Social Science,8(10), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p29.
Baydik, O. D., & Gasparyan, A. Y. (2016). How to act when research misconduct is not detected by software but revealed by the author of the plagiarized article. Journal of Korean Medical Science,31(10), 1508–1510. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1508.
Baždarić, K., Bilić-Zulle, L., Brumini, G., & Petrovečki, M. (2012). Prevalence of plagiarism in recent submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal. Science and Engineering Ethics,18(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9347-2.
Bennett, K. K., Behrendt, L. S., & Boothby, J. L. (2011). Instructor perceptions of plagiarism: are we finding common ground? Teaching of Psychology,38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390851.
Bilic-Zulle, L., Azman, J., Frkovic, V., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing? Science and Engineering Ethics,14(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9037-2.
Bilić-Zulle, L., Frković, V., Turk, T., Ažman, J., & Petrovečki, M. (2005). Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croatian Medical Journal,46(1), 126–131.
Bokosmaty, S., Ehrich, J., Eady, M. J., & Bell, K. (2017). Canadian university students’ gendered attitudes toward plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1359505.
Bretag, T. (2013). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLoS Medicine,10(12), e1001574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001574.
Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher,32(3), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216825.
Cameron, C., Zhao, H., & McHugh, M. K. (2012). Publication ethics and the emerging scientific workforce: understanding ‘plagiarsim’ in a global context. Academic Medicine,87(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823aadc7.
Castillo, M. (2014). The fraud and retraction epidemic. American Journal of Neuroradiology,35(9), 1653–1654. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3835.
Comas-Forgas, R., Sureda-Negre, J., & Salva-Mut, F. (2010). Academic plagiarism prevalence among Spanish undergraduate students: an exploratory analysis. Biochemia Medica,20(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.038.
de Jager, K., & Brown, C. (2010). The tangled web: investigating academics’ views of plagiarism at the University of Cape Town. Studies in Higher Education,35(5), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903222641.
Debnath, J. (2016). Plagiarism: A silent epidemic in scientific writing–Reasons, recognition and remedies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India,72(2), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.03.010.
Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Anast, A., & Roehling, T. (2017). Student and faculty perceptions of plagiarism in health sciences education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356913.
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE,4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. Journal of Korean Medical Science,32(8), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220.
Ghajarzadeh, M., Norouzi-Javidan, A., Hassanpour, K., Aramesh, K., & Emami-Razavi, S. H. (2012). Attitude toward plagiarism among Iranian medical faculty members. Acta Medica Iranica,50(11), 778–781.
Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity,6(1), 13–28.
Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students’ understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education,39(7), 1202–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412.
Guraya, S., & Guraya, S. (2017). The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic review. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association,67(5), 767–772.
Habibzadeh, F., & Shashok, K. (2011). Plagiarism in scientific writing: words or ideas? Croatian Medical Journal,52(4), 576–577. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2011.52.576.
Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2013). Faculty perceptions of student self plagiarism: an exploratory multi-university study. Journal of Academic Ethics,11(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9195-6.
Heitman, E., & Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology,29(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014.
Hong, S. T. (2017). Plagiarism continues to affect scholarly journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science,32(2), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.2.183.
Husain, F. M., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: a Review of Studies. Journal of Academic Ethics,15(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9274-1.
Ibegbulam, I. J., & Eze, J. U. (2015). Knowledge, perception and attitude of Nigerian students to plagiarism: A case study. IFLA Journal,41(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215580278.
Ison, D. C. (2012). Plagiarism among dissertations: Prevalence at online institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics,10(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9165-4.
Ison, D. C. (2015). The influence of the Internet on plagiarism among doctoral dissertations: An empirical study. Journal of Academic Ethics,13(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9233-7.
Jawad, F. (2013). Plagiarism and integrity in research. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association,63(11), 1446–1447.
Jiang, H., Emmerton, L., & McKauge, L. (2013). Academic integrity and plagiarism: a review of the influences and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research & Development,32(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.687362.
Katavić, V. (2006). Five-year report of Croatian Medical Journal’s Research Integrity Editor–policy, policing, or policing policy. Croatian Medical Journal,47(2), 220–228.
Kayaoğlu, M. N., Erbay, Ş., Flitner, C., & Saltaş, D. (2016). Examining students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education,40(5), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014320.
Kerans, M. E., & de Jager, M. (2010). Handling plagiarism at the manuscript editor’s desk. European Science Editing,36(3), 62–66.
Kim, S. Y. (2013). Plagiarism detection. Korean Journal of Family Medicine,34(6), 371. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.6.371.
Krishan, K., Kanchan, T., Baryah, N., & Mukhra, R. (2017). Plagiarism in student research: responsibility of the supervisors and suggestions to ensure plagiarism free research. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(4), 1243–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9822-x.
Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7.
Leonard, M., Schwieder, D., Buhler, A., Bennett, D. B., & Royster, M. (2015). Perceptions of plagiarism by STEM graduate students: A case study. Science and Engineering Ethics,21(6), 1587–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9604-2.
Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal,51(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195.
McCullough, M., & Holmberg, M. (2005). Using the Google search engine to detect word-for-word plagiarism in master’s theses: A preliminary study. College Student Journal,39(3), 435–442.
McGrail, E., & McGrail, J. P. (2015). Exploring web-based university policy statements on plagiarism by research-intensive higher education institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics,13(2), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9229-3.
Mohammed, R. A., Shaaban, O. M., Mahran, D. G., Attellawy, H. N., Makhlof, A., & Albasri, A. (2015). Plagiarism in medical scientific research. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences,10(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.007.
Moylan, E. C., & Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. British Medical Journal Open,6(11), e012047. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047.
Okonta, P. I., & Rossouw, T. (2014). Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics,15(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
Omonijo, D. O., Anyaegbunam, M. C., Uche, O. O. C., Beneth, C., & Obiorah, C. E. O. (2017). The Menace of Plagiarism: Sensitizing faculty, staff and students in Nigerian Higher Education Systems. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,2(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21276/sjhss.2017.2.1.4.
Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,12(4), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004.
Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students–cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica,20(3), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.039.
Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe. An analytical approach based on four studies. Digithum,10, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i10.507.
Ramzan, M., Munir, M. A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher Education,64(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9481-4.
Rathore, F. A., & Farooq, F. (2014). Plagiarism detection softwares: Useful tools for medical writers and editors. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association,64(11), 1329–1330.
Rathore, F. A., Waqas, A., Zia, A. M., Mavrinac, M., & Farooq, F. (2015). Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey. PeerJ,3, e1031. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1031.
Razera, D., Verhagen, H., Pargman, T. C., & Ramberg, R. (2010). Plagiarism awareness, perception, and attitudes among students and teachers in Swedish higher education–a case study. In 4th international plagiarism conference–towards an authentic future. Northumbria University in Newcastle Upon Tyne-UK, 2010 (pp. 21–23).
Roig, M. (2012). Avoiding unethical writing practices. Food and Chemical Toxicology,50(10), 3385–3387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.06.043.
Roig, M. (2017). Encouraging editoral flexibility in cases of textual reuse. Journal of Korean Medical Science,32(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.557.
Ryan, G., Bonanno, H., Krass, I., Scouller, K., & Smith, L. (2009). Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students’ perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,73(6), 105. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7306105.
Scanlan, C. L. (2006). Strategies to promote a climate of academic integrity and minimize student cheating and plagiarism. Journal of Allied Health,35(3), 179–185.
Shashok, K. (2009). AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean: A communication bridge between mainstream and emerging research communities. European Science Editing,35(3), 106–108.
Shashok, K. (2013). Plagiarism. In P. Smart, H. Maisonneuve, & A. Polderman (Eds.), Science editors’ handbook (pp. 166–170). Redruth: European Association of Science Editors.
Shashok, K., & Handjani, F. (2010). Enhancing the quality of research publication: AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean. The Journal of Tehran Heart Center,5(4), 169–171.
Shirazi, B., Jafarey, A. M., & Moazam, F. (2010). Plagiarism and the medical fraternity: A study of knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association,60(4), 269–273.
Singh, S., & Remenyi, D. (2016). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science,112(5–6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150300.
Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija,50(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0002.
Steen, R. G., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2013). Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS ONE,8(7), e68397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068397.
Stretton, S., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., Monk, J. A., Ely, J. A., Haley, C., et al. (2012). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion,28(10), 1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.728131.
Theart, C. J., & Smit, I. (2012). The status of academic integrity amongst nursing students at a nursing education institution in the Western Cape. Curationis,35(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v35i1.27.
Walchuk, K. (2016). An examination of the efficacy of the plagiarism detection software program Turnitin. Master of Education [thesis]. Ontario: University of Ontario Institute of Technology. https://ir.library.dc-uoit.ca/handle/10155/717. Accessed October 2, 2017.
Walker, A. L. (2008). Preventing unintentional plagiarism: A method for strengthening paraphrasing skills. Journal of Instructional Psychology,35(4), 387–396.
Yahaghi, J., Beddu, S. B., & Muda, Z. C. (2017). Plagiarism in publications using the unpublished raw data of archived research. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(2), 635–636.
Zeng, W., & Resnik, D. (2010). Research integrity in China: Problems and prospects. Developing World Bioethics,10(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00263.x.
The authors would like to thank the AuthorAID Team for permission to conduct this survey during the fourth AuthorAID Proposal Writing and Research Writing MOOC between April 2017 and June 2017. We also thank K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and for improving the use of English in the manuscript.
The Validation of the Attitudes toward Plagiarism Questionnaire was part of the scientific project titled “Relation to scientific plagiarism, its prevalence and features” (No. 829-10-1229) supported by the University of Rijeka. However, the current study received no funding from any agency.
Conflict of interest
ARM served as one of the guest facilitators in the fourth AuthorAID Proposal Writing and Research Writing MOOC. There are no further competing interests.
The INASP Team gave permission to conduct the survey, and the Research Ethics Committee of Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah approved the study (Letter No: PUMHSW/SBA/PVC/214; project code: IPRS-17-95).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Memon, A.R., Mavrinac, M. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 1067–1088 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1
- Online learning
- Research ethics
- Developing countries