Self-reflection for Activist Engineering


Many blame politicians, governments, and markets for the technically-driven problems the world faces (think war, climate change, surveillance, disinformation, and so on). But why is it that there are almost always engineers and corporations willing to design and build the technologies that cause those problems, many times in spite of knowing about the negative consequences of those technologies? I offer in this paper practical guidance on how to engage in activist engineering, the goal of which is to get engineers to step back from their work and be able to ask and have a conversation about the question, “What is the real problem, and does this problem ‘require’ an engineering solution?” Building on research in the history and philosophy of engineering, and engineering ethics and education, as well as current events—all of which highlight important issues of debate within engineering practice—I provide a list of questions that engineers can start with for self-reflection to better understand their motivations for doing engineering work, and to better understand the implications of their work. The questions relate to considerations engineers must make regarding the social, environmental, economic, and peace implications of their work, and relate to alternative and non-technical interventions to the problem at hand. I believe that each engineer should, in the end, be able to answer the questions: Why am I an engineer? For whose benefit do I work? What is the full measure of my moral and social responsibility?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    I pilot-tested the questions in Table 1 on students, engineers working in industry, and engineers working in the federal government.


  1. A. James Clark Engineering School at the University of Maryland. (2019). Science, Technology and Society. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  2. Adely, H., & Alvarado, M. (2017, March 8). New Jersey companies want to help build Trump’s border wall. Northjersey.Com. Retrieved from Accessed 13 June 2018.

  3. AIAA. (2013). Code of ethics. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  4. Aldridge, B. (1973). The forging of an engineer’s conscience. Spark,3(2), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alford, C. F. (2001). Whistleblowers: Broken lives and organizational power. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen, K. (2018). What is an ethical dilemma? Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  7. ASCE. (2017). Code of ethics. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  8. ASME. (1998). Code of ethics. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  9. Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2015). Pro … t with Purpose ? A Theory of Social Enterprise,9(3), 19–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bielefeldt, A. R., & Canney, N. (2014). Impacts of service-learning on the professional social responsibility attitudes of engineering students. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering,9(2), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bosman, L., Chelberg, K., & Winn, R. (2017). How does service learning increase and sustain interest in engineering education for underrepresented pre-engineering college students? Journal of STEM Education,18(2), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bucciarelli, L. (1984). Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies,5(3), 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bucciarelli, L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education,33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke, T. (2018). The inception. Retrieved August 6, 2019, from

  15. Cabedo, L., & Guraya, T. (2017). New competences in Engineering Education in the area of sustainability and university social responsibility. In 1st international conference on engineering education for the XXI century. Retrieved from Accessed 4 Mar 2019.

  16. Catalano, G. D. (2004). A peace paradigm for engineering education: A dissenter’s view. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for engineering education annual conference & exposition.

  17. Cech, E. (2012). Great Problems of grand challenges: Problematizing engineering’s understandings of its role in society. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace,1(2), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In J. C. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities (pp. 67–84). Dordrecht, Netherlands, and New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values,39(1), 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Conger, K. (2018). Google employees resign in protest against pentagon contract. Retrieved from Accessed 1 Mar 2019.

  21. D’Souza, S. (2019). I feel like I’m in another country: Inside America’s latest lead water crisis. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  22. DARPA. (n.d.). The Heilmeier catechism. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from

  23. Della Costa, C. (2015). Nine medical procedures that cost way too much. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  24. Department of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. (2019). Science, technology & society. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  25. Donald, K. J., & Kovac, J. (2013). The Scientist’s education and a civic conscience. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(3), 1229–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Downey, G., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., et al. (2006). The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elliott, K., Patacconi, A., Swierzbinski, J., & Williams, J. (2019). Knowledge protection in firms: A Conceptual framework and evidence from HP labs. European Management Review,16, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Zein, A. H., & Hedemann, C. (2016). Beyond problem solving: Engineering and the public good in the 21st century. Journal of Cleaner Production,137, 692–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. (2017a). Other border Wall RFP. Retrieved July 7, 2018, from

  30. (2017b). Solid concrete border wall RFP. Retrieved July 7, 2018, from

  31. Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A., & Smith-Doerr, L. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fowler, J. (2018). Personal communication.

  33. Frickel, S. (2004). Chemical consequences: Environmental mutagens, scientist activism, and the rise of genetic toxicology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friere, P. (1970 [2000]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. 30th anniversary edition [translated by M.B. Ramos]. New York, NY: Continuum Publishing.

  35. Ganz, M. (2008). What is public narrative? Retrieved from

  36. Gardner, C. S.3084—American Innovation and Competitiveness Act. (2017). US. Retrieved from Accessed 5 July 2019.

  37. Garnell, J. (2017). From engineer to manager: Keeping your technical skills. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  38. Google Employees. (2018). Internal petition. Retrieved from Accessed 1 Mar 2019.

  39. Google Inc. (2018). Artificial intelligence at Google: Our principles. Retrieved August 28, 2019, from

  40. Green, B. A. (1997). The role of personal values in professional decisionmaking. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics,11, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hale, C. (2001). What is activist research? Social Science Research Council,2(1–2), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hannah, D. R. (2005). Should i keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees’ obligations to protect trade secrets should i keep a secret ? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees’ obligations to protect trade secrets. Organization Science,16(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of france: Nuclear power and national identity after world war II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics,7(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics,11(3), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Herkert, J. R. (2009). Macroethics in engineering—the case of climate change. In S. Hyldgaard Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 435–446). Denmark: Arhus.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hughes, T. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups i, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland.

  49. Johnson, D. G. (1989). The social/professional responsibility of engineers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 577(1), 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Johnson, R. A. (2003). Whistleblowing: When it works-and why. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Johnstone, M.-J. (1988). Law, professional ethics and the problem of conflict with personal values. International Journal of Nursing Studies,25(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Karwat, D. M. A. (2017, March). Why engineers should refuse to work on trump’s wall. Retrieved July 7, 2018, from

  53. Karwat, D. M. A., Eagle, W. E., Wooldridge, M. S., & Princen, T. E. (2014). Activist engineering: changing engineering practice by deploying praxis. Science and Engineering Ethics,21(1), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Karwat, D. M. A., Sherman, L. S., Cole, L., Badiane, K. C., Coseo, P. J., & Larsen, L. S. (2013). A lesson in service learning and community engagement. Michigan Journal of Sustainability.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lambrinidou, Y., & Canney, N. E. (2017). Engineers’ imaginaries of the public: Content analysis of foundational professional documents. In ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings.

  56. Lashinsky, A. (2012). Inside Apple: How America’s most admired—And secretive—Company really work. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Layton, E. T., Jr. (1971). The Revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession (1st ed.). Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lean Six Sigma Institute. (2018). Lean Six Sigma certification. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  59. Levins, R. (2008). One foot in, one foot out. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy,18(2), 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2009). Listening as a missing dimension in engineering education: Implications for sustainable community development efforts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,52(4), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2017). Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice. Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Leydens, J. A., Lucena, J. C., & Nieusma, D. (2014). What is design for social justice? ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings. Retrieved from

  63. Liebeskind, J. P. (1997). Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial and Corporate Change,6(3), 623–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Martin, M., & Schinzinger, R. (2009). Introduction to engineering ethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1845 [1976]). Collected works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 184547, vol. 5: Theses on Feuerbach, The German ideology and related manuscripts. New York, NY: International Publishers.

  67. Meganck, M., Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Delahousse, B., Murphy, M., & Didier, C. (2018). The engineering-business nexus: symbiosis, tension and co-evolution. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mehta, K. (2015). Solving problems that matter (and getting paid for it). CreateSpace independent publishing platform. Retrieved from Accessed 13 June 2018.

  69. Mina, M., Cowan, J., & Heywood, J. (2015). Case for reflection in engineering education—and an alternative. In 2015 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE).

  70. Mitcham, C. (1998). The importance of philosophy to engineering. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía,17(3), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Moore, K. (2008). Disrupting science: Social movements, american scientists, and the politics of the military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Murray, S. (2013, June 11). Capitalism struggles to balance social value and profit. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from

  73. National Academy of Engineering. (2017). Grand challenges for engineering.

  74. National Science Board. (2018). Science & engineering indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from Accessed 10 Dec 2018.

  75. National Science Foundation. (2014). Perspectives on broader impacts.

  76. Nieusma, D. (2011). Engineering, social justice, and peace: Strategies for pedagogical, curricular, and institutional reform. In Proceedings of the 2011 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.

  77. Nieusma, D., & Riley, D. (2010). Designs on development: engineering, globalization, and social justice. Engineering Studies,2(1), 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  79. NSPE. (1992). Public welfare—Duty of government engineer.

  80. NSPE. (2018). NSPE code of ethics for engineers. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  81. Ottinger, G. (2013). Refining expertise: How responsible engineers subvert environmental justice challenges. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ottinger, G., & Cohen, B. (2012). Environmentally just transformations of expert cultures: Toward the theory and practice of a renewed science and engineering. Environmental Justice,5(3), 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Pew Research Center. (2018). About a quarter of rural Americans say access to high-speed internet is a major problem. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  84. Project Management Institute. (2019). Project management professional (PMP)®. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  85. Punzi, V. L. (2017). A social responsibility guide for engineering students and professionals of all faith traditions: An overview. Science and Engineering Ethics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Quarter, J., & Richmond, B. J. (2001). Accounting for social value in nonprofits and for-profits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership,12(1), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. r/AskEngineers. (2014). The ethics of engineering in the defense industry. Retrieved June 6, 2018, from

  88. r/AskEngineers. (2015). Unhappy with first engineering job. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from

  89. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. Morgan and Claypool.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Riley, D. (2012). We’ve been framed! ends, means, and the ethics of the grand (IOSE) challenges. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice,1(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Riley, D., & Lambrinidou, Y. (2015). Canons against Cannons? Social justice and the engineering ethics imaginary. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.,10, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Romzek, B. S., Dubnick, M. J., & Romzek, B. S. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review,47(3), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sakellariou, N. (2013). A Framwork for social justice in renewable energy engineering. In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities. Philosophy of engineering and technology 10 (pp. 243–267). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  94. School for the Future of Innovation in Society at ASU. (2019). Degree programs. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  95. Science for the People. (n.d.). Science for the people. Retrieved June 25, 2018, from

  96. Sellers, C. C. (1997). Hazards of the Job: From industrial disease to environmental health science. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Smith, M. (1999). What is praxis? Retrieved August 1, 2019, from

  98. Sonne, P. (2018, February 2). Pentagon unveils new nuclear weapons strategy, ending Obama-era push to reduce U.S. arsenal. Washington post. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from Accessed 12 June 2018.

  99. The Architecture Lobby. (2017). #NotOurWall. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from

  100. Tsang, E., van Haneghan, J., Johnson, B., Newman, E. J., & Van Eck, S. (2001). A report on service-learning and engineering design: Service-learning’s effect on students learning engineering design in “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering”. International Journal of Engineering Education,17(1), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Turns, J. A., Sattler, B., Yasuhara, K., Borgford-Parnell, J. L., & Atman, C. J. (2014). Integrating reflection into engineering education. In ASEE 2014 annual conference & exposition.

  102. van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2011). Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Various. (2018). Engineer vs manager. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from

  104. Vesilind, P. A. (2010). Peace and justice. In Engineering peace and justice (pp. 119–134).

  105. Vesilind, P. A., & Gunn, A. S. (1998). Engineering, Ethics, and the Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Villasenor, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence, deepfakes, and the uncertain future of truth. Retrieved August 29, 2019, from

  107. Wakabayashi, D., & Shane, S. (2018). Google will not renew pentagon contract that upset employees. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from

  108. Whitbeck, C. (1996). Ethics as design: Doing justice to moral problems. The Hastings Center Report,26(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of technology. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wisnioski, M. (2012). Engineers for change: Competing visions of technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Work, R. O. (2017). Establishment of the algorithmic warfare cross-functional team (Project Maven). Memorandum. Retrieved from Accessed 12 June 2018.

  112. Zandvoort, H. (2008). Preparing engineers for social responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education,33(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


I am grateful for the continued guidance, support, feedback, and input of Dr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Dr. Zachary Pirtle, and Dr. Daniel Sarewitz. I thank the editor and four anonymous reviewers for their input, feedback, and support for this manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darshan M. A. Karwat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karwat, D.M.A. Self-reflection for Activist Engineering. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 1329–1352 (2020).

Download citation


  • Activist engineering
  • Self-reflection
  • Praxis
  • Peace
  • Justice
  • Environment